Exploring Personality Traits’ Impact on Risk Perception in Mobile Payments

References

• Allport GW. Pattern and growth in personality. Ballwin (MO/United States): Holt, Reinhart & Winston; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Buelow MT, Cayton C. Relationships between the big five personality characteristics and performance on behavioral decision making tasks. Pers Individ Differ. 2020;160:109931. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soane E, Dewberry C, Narendran S. The role of perceived costs and perceived benefits in the relationship between personality and risk-related choices. J Risk Res. 2010;13(3):303–18. doi:10.1080/13669870902987024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MF, Luh YH, Huang YH, Chang YC. Young generation’s mobile payment adoption behavior: analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2021;16(4):618–37. doi:10.3390/jtaer16040037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty D. Purchase behavior of consumers toward GSAs: a longitudinal assessment. J Comput Inf Syst. 2023;63(5):1031–1056. doi:10.1080/08874417.2022.2123065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Chakraborty D, Verma M. Barriers of food delivery applications: a perspective from innovation resistance theory using mixed method. J Retail Consum Serv. 2023;73:103369. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty D, Siddiqui A, Siddiqui M, Rana NP, Dash G. Mobile payment apps filling value gaps: integrating consumption values with initial trust and customer involvement. J Retail Consum Serv. 2022;66:102946. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi H, Chawla D. Identifying unobserved heterogeneity in mobile wallet adoption-A FIMIX-PLS approach for user segmentation. Int J Bank Mark. 2022;41(1):210–36. doi:10.1108/IJBM-03-2022-0132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor A, Sindwani R, Goel M, Shankar A. Mobile wallet adoption intention amid COVID-19 pandemic outbreak: a novel conceptual framework. Comput Ind Eng. 2022;172:108646. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana NP, Luthra S, Rao HR. Assessing challenges to the mobile wallet usage in India: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Inf Technol People. 2023;36(4):1533–54. doi:10.1108/ITP-07-2021-0535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Tang J, Hou Y, Li S, Sun S. Gamification of mobile wallet as an unconventional innovation for promoting Fintech: an fsQCA approach. J Bus Res. 2023;155:113406. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong HB, Chong LL. The effect of cashless payments on the internet and mobile banking. J Financ Serv Mark. 2023;28:178–88. doi:10.1057/s41264-022-00145-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singu HB, Chakraborty D. I have the bank in my pocket: theoretical evidence and perspectives. J Public Affairs. 2020;22:e2568. doi:10.1002/pa.2568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changchit C, Changchit C, Cutshall R, Pham L, Rao M. Understanding the determinants of customer intention to use mobile payment: the Vietnamese perspective. J Glob Inf Manage. 2023;31(1):1–27. doi:10.4018/JGIM.319740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhowaiter WA. Digital payment and banking adoption research in gulf countries: a systematic literature review. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;53:102102. Article. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil P, Tamilmani K, Rana NP, Raghavan V. Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: extending meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;54:54. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobti N. Impact of demonetization on diffusion of mobile payment service in India: antecedents of behavioral intention and adoption using extended UTAUT model. J Adv Manag Res. 2019;16:472–97. doi:10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung CG. Psychological types. Princeton (NJ/United States): Princeton University Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan WJ. Judgments, choices, and decisions. Hoboken (NJ/United States): Wiley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• McCaulley MH. The Myers-Briggs type indicator: a jungian model for problem solving. In: Stice JE, editor. New directions for teaching and learning. Hoboken (NJ/United States): Wiley; 1987. p. 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in adulthood. New York (NY/United States): Guilford Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer RA. Consumer behavior as risk taking. J Bus Res. 1960;56:867–75.
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe SM, Shi B. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping. J Bus Res. 2003;56(11):867–875. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boo HC, Chua BL. An integrative model of facial recognition check-in technology adoption intention: the perspective of hotel guests in Singapore. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2022;34(11):4052–79. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Singh R, Kumar K, Khan S, Corvello V. How does perceived risk and trust affect mobile banking adoption? Empirical evidence from India. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4053. doi:10.3390/su15054053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Yadav R, Choudhary V. Analyzing the impact of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in internet banking adoption: a study of Indian consumers. Int J Bank Mark. 2019;37(1):323–339. doi:10.1108/IJBM-02-2018-0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Ye L, Huang W, Ye M. Understanding FinTech platform adoption: impacts of perceived value and perceived risk. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2021;16(5):1893. doi:10.3390/jtaer16050106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur R, Srivastava M. Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Res. 2014;24(3):369–392. doi:10.1108/IntR-12-2012-0244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Liu Y, Li H, Yu B. Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2015;115(2):253–269. doi:10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrawad M, Lutfi A, Almaiah MA, Elshaer IA. Examining the influence of trust and perceived risk on customers’ intention to use NFC mobile payment systems. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2023;9(2):100070. doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100070.
   Google Scholar
• Changchit C, Changchit C, Cutshall R, Pham L, Rao M. Understanding the determinants of customer intention to use mobile payment: the Vietnamese perspective. J Global Inf Manage. 2023;31(1):1–27. doi:10.4018/JGIM.319740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche D, Guinalíu M, Albás P. Customer adoption of p2p mobile payment systems: the role of perceived risk. Telemat Inform. 2022;72:101851. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin AG, Harris MA, Brookshire R. An empirical investigation of intent to adopt mobile payment systems using a trust-based extended valence framework. Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(1):329–347. doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10080-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malarvizhi CA, Al MA, Jayashree S, Naznen F, Abir T. Predicting the intention and adoption of near field communication mobile payment. Front Psychol. 2022;13:870793. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HW, Lu HF. Elucidating the association of sports lottery bettors’ socio-demographics, personality traits, risk tolerance and behavioural biases. Pers Individ Differ. 2015;73:118–26. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 1992;6(4):343–59. doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice N, Robone S. The effects of health shocks on risk preferences: do personality traits matter? J Econ Behav Organ. 2022;204:356–371. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochemczyk L, Pietrzak J, Buczkowski R, Stolarsk M, Markiewicz L. You only live once: present-hedonistic time perspective predicts risk propensity. Pers Individ Differ. 2017;115:148–53. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissitsa S, Kol O. Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention. Electron Commer Res. 2021;21:545–70. doi:10.1007/s10660-019-09381-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordor Intelligence. Mobile payments market size & share analysis- growth trends and forecasts; 2023 May 17 [accessed 2023 Dec 1]. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/mobile-payment-market.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Mobile POS payments - worldwide; 2023 [accessed 2023 Dec 1]. https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/fintech/digital-payments/mobile-pos-payments/worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Vinney C. Understanding the big five personality traits. ThoughtCo; 2018 [accessed 2023 Dec 1]. https://www.thoughtco.com/big-five-personality-traits-4176097.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry F. The ‘stubborn of social psychology: essays on the research process. New York (NY/United States): Taylor & Frances/Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman CE. Big five personality traits: the ocean model explained. PositivePsychology.Com; 2023 May [accessed 2023 Dec 1]. https://positivepsychology.com/big-five-personality-theory/.
   Google Scholar
• Watjatrakul B. Intention to adopt online learning: the effects of perceived value and moderating roles of personality traits. Int J Inf Learn Technol. 2020;37(1/2):46–65. doi:10.1108/IJILT-03-2019-0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesan R, Jayavelu R. The influence of big five personality traits and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender. J Entrepren Innov Emerg Econ. 2017;3(1):41–61. doi:10.1177/2393957516684569.
   Google Scholar
• Webster SW. It’s personal: the big five personality traits and negative partisan affect in polarized US politics. Am Behav Sci. 2018;62(1):127–45. doi:10.1177/0002764218756925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huevos RE. The relationship of big 5 personality traits and self-esteem of selected maritime cadets: a basis for a holistic training program. Ascendens Asia J Multidiscip Res Conf Proc. 2019;3:118.
   Google Scholar
• Stachl C, Au Q, Schoedel R, Buschek D, Völkel S, Schuwerk T, Bühner M. Behavioral patterns in smartphone usage predict big five personality traits. OSF. 2019. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/KQJHR.
   Google Scholar
• Arpaci I, Kocadag Unver T. Moderating role of gender in the relationship between big five personality traits and smartphone addiction. Psychiatr Q. 2020;91(2):577–85. doi:10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazkiaei H, Heng L, Khan N, Saufi R, Kasim R, Foroudi P. Do entrepreneurial education and big-five personality traits predict entrepreneurial intention among universities students? Cogent Bus Manage. 2020;7(1):1801217. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1801217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirásek M, Sudzina F. Big five personality traits and creativity. Qual Innov Prosper. 2020;24(3):90–105. doi:10.12776/qip.v24i3.1509.
   Google Scholar
• Audet ÉC, Levine SL, Metin E, Koestner S, Barcan S. Zooming their way through university: which big 5 traits facilitated students’ adjustment to online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pers Individ Differ. 2021;180:Article 110969. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hesselle LC, Rozgonjuk D, Sindermann C, Pontes HM, Montag C, de Hesselle LC. The associations between big five personality traits, gaming motives, and self-reported time spent gaming. Pers Individ Differ. 2021;171:Article 110483. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst-Linke F, Enge S, Viohl L, Petzold MB, Betzler F. High five! – the big 5 personality traits, locus of control, and impulsivity and their relationship to substance use in a large cohort of university students in Berlin. Addict Res Theory. 2021;31(2):84–91. doi:10.1080/16066359.2022.2114075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Dudani R, Latha K. The big five personality traits and psychological biases: an exploratory study. Curr Psychol. 2021;42(8). doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01999-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikčević AV, Marino C, Kolubinski DC, Leach D, Spada MM. Modelling the contribution of the big five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2021;279:578–84. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero-Lopez JM, Santiago MJ, Castro MC. Big five personality traits, coping strategies and compulsive buying in Spanish university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):821. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramon Y, Farrokhnia RA, Matz SC, Martens D. Explainable AI for psychological profiling from behavioral data: an application to big five personality predictions from financial transaction records. Information. 2021;12(12):Article 518. doi:10.3390/info12120518.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes A, Sindermann C, Montag C, Riedl R. Exploring online and in-store purchase willingness: associations with the big five personality traits, trust, and need for touch. Front Psychol. 2022;13:Article 808500. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali F, Tauni MZ, Ali A. The big five dyad congruence and compulsive buying: a case of service encounters. J Retail Consum Serv. 2022;68:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaci I, Karatas K, Kusci I, Al-Emran M. Understanding the social sustainability of the metaverse by integrating UTAUT2 and big five personality traits: a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Technol Soc. 2022;71:102120. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herchenroeder LM, Bravo AJ L, Pilatti A, Prince MA, Study Team CA, Study Team CCA. A cross-national examination of cannabis protective behavioral strategies’ role in the relationship between big five personality traits and cannabis outcomes. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022;48(1):27–37. doi:10.1080/00952990.2021.1919689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa S, Qiao Y, Yan X, Anwar A, Hao T, Rana S. Digital students’ satisfaction with and intention to use online teaching modes, role of big five personality traits. Front Psychol. 2022;13:Article 956281. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sedlar M, Grezo M. Willingness to participate in biobanking: the roles of big five personality traits and interpersonal trusting beliefs. Pers Individ Differ. 2022;197:111770. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyei J, Sun S, Ofori-Boafo R, Penney EK, Ofori-Boafo R. Mobile banking adoption: examining the role of personality traits. SAGE Open. 2020;10(2):1–15. doi:10.1177/2158244020932918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Easley RF, Crant JM. Research note—how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inf Syst Res. 2008;19(1):93–105. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. Handbook Person Psychol. 1997:767–93. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50030-5.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Diffusion of innovation. Cheney (WA/United States): The-Free Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffour P, Mohammed I, Abdul Rahaman W. Personality and gender differences in revealed risk preference: evidence from Ghana. Int J Soc Econ. 2019;46(5):631–647. doi:10.1108/IJSE-07-2018-0346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark G, Ganzach Y. Personality and internet usage: a large-scale representative study of young adults. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;36:274–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos JM, Kazemi A. Personality traits and Internet usage across generation cohorts: insights from a nationally representative study. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(3):1287–1297. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992;60(2):175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikbin D, Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B. Personality traits, psychological well-being, Facebook addiction, health and performance: testing their relationships. Behav Inf Technol. 2021;40(7):706–722. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1722749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa T, Bachmann I, Hinsley AW, de Zúñiga HG. Personality and social media use. In: Li EY, Loh S, Evans C, Lorenzi F, Li EO, Loh S, Lorenzi F, editors. Organizations and social networking: utilizing social media to engage consumers. Business Science Reference/IGI Global; 2013. p. 41–61. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4026-9.ch003.
   Google Scholar
• Bayram N, Aydemir M. Decision-making styles and personality traits. Int J Rec Adv Org Behav Decis Sci. 2017;3:905–15.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Pullig C, Manolis C. I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Pers Individ Differ. 2015;79:13–19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng M, Dutta B. The mediating effects of innovativeness and system usability on students’ personality differences: recommendations for e-learning platforms in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):5867. doi:10.3390/su15075867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers DJ. The role of personality traits and online academic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use and achievement in moodle. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26:4353–4378. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10478-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao AS, Lakkol SG. A review on personality models and investment decisions. J Behav Exp Finance. 2022;35:100691. doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross C, Orr ES, Sisic M, Arseneault JM, Simmering MG, Orr RR. Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav. 2009;25(2):578–586. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzis V, Moridis CN, Economides AA. How student’s personality traits affect computer based assessment acceptance: integrating BFI with CBAAM. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(5):1985–1996. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey AA, Pentina I, Mishra AS, Ben Mimoun MS. Exploring factors influencing US millennial consumers’ use of tap-and-go payment technology. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res. 2020;30(2):143–63. doi:10.1080/09593969.2019.1667854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen GB, Johnsen JK, Almas-Sorensen L, Vitters J. Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the technology acceptance model. Behav Inf Technol. 2013;32(4):323–34. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.553740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY/United States): McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Saddle River (NJ/United States): Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Q. 2009;33:689–707. doi:10.2307/20650323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88(3):588–600. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehler A, Wedlich F. The relationship of extraversion and neuroticism with risk attitude, risk perception, and return expectations. J Neurosci Psychol Econ. 2018;11(2):63–92. doi:10.1037/npe0000088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy JC, Hendrickson AR, Townsend AM, DeMarie SM. Dispositional factors in internet use: personality versus cognitive style. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):809–20. doi:10.2307/25148821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho C, Franco M, Mendes L. Acceptance and use of information technology: context of Portuguese universities. Inf Learn Sci. 2020;121(11/12):869–887. doi:10.1108/ILS-02-2020-0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin SA, Birt MH, Graham DJ. The impact of personality traits on investment decisions: a meta-analysis. J Econ Psychol. 2023;93:102545.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MA, Rahman S. Investigating the success of OGB in China: the influence of personality traits. Inf Syst Front. 2021;23(3):543–559. doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09968-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Herting MJ, Loewenstein G. The role of personality traits in financial decision-making: a systematic review. Psychol Bull. 2023;149:427–70.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Fan X. Personality traits and financial risk tolerance: a cross-cultural study. J Econ Behav Organ. 2023;198:104988.
   Google Scholar
• Madan K, Yadav R. Behavioural intention to adopt mobile wallet: a developing country perspective. J Indian Bus Res. 2016;8(3):227–44. doi:10.1108/JIBR-10-2015-0112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar