Students’ GAI Acceptance: Role of Demographics, Creative Mindsets, Anxiety, Attitudes

References

• Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: a review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:75264–75278. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L. Artificial intelligence in the rising wave of deep learning: the historical path and future outlook [perspectives]. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2018;35(1):80–177. doi:10.1109/MSP.2017.2762725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal DS. A critical conceptual analysis of definitions of artificial intelligence as applicable to computer engineering. IOSR J Comput Eng. 2014;16(2):9–13. doi:10.9790/0661-16210913.
   Google Scholar
• Lieto A, Bhatt M, Oltramari A, Vernon D. The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence. Cognit Syst Res. 2028;48:1–3. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Matyushok V, Vera Krasavina V, Berezin A, Sendra García J. The global economy in technological transformation conditions: a review of modern trends. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2021;34(1):1471–1497. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2020.1844030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S. ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J Appl Learn Teach. 2023;6(1):342–363.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu D, Ansah LO. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. J AI. 2023;7(1):52–62. doi:10.61969/jai.1337500.
   Google Scholar
• Choi J. The creative mindset in design education. Retrieved from the university digital conservancy. 2019 [accessed 2024 June 3]. 26. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/203584.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck C. What having a “growth mindset” actually means. Harvard Bus Rev. 2016;13:213–226.
   Google Scholar
• Fui-Hoon Nah F, Zheng R, Cai J, Siau K, Chen L. Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and ai-human collaboration. J Inf Technol Case Appl Res. 2023;25(3):277–304. doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814.
   Google Scholar
• Chan CKY, Hu W. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20(1):43. doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz Durak H. Conversational agent-based guidance: examining the effect of chatbot usage frequency and satisfaction on visual design self-efficacy, engagement, satisfaction, and learner autonomy. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(1):471–488. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11149-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytak A. The acceptance and diffusion of generative artificial intelligence in education: a literature review. Curr Perspectives Educ Res. 2023;6(1):7–18. doi:10.46303/cuper.2023.2.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz FGK, Yilmaz R, Ceylan M. Generative artificial intelligence acceptance scale: a validity and reliability study. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2023; 1–13. doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11(4):342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Mis Q. 2012;36(1):157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39(2):273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HD, Yoo Y. It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis Support Syst. 2004;38(1):19–31. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00062-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Forney JC. The moderating role of consumer technology anxiety in mobile shopping adoption: differential effects of facilitating conditions and social influences. J Electron Commerce Res. 2013;14(4):334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimovitz K, Dweck CS. The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: new research and a new proposal. Child Devel. 2017;88(6):1849–1859. doi:10.1111/cdev.12955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks LI, Wade JC. Positive psychology on campus: creating the conditions for well–being and success. About Campus. 2015;19(6):9–15. doi:10.1002/abc.21174.
   Google Scholar
• Sarhan YS. At the intersectionality of growth mindset and technology acceptance and use: a quantitative study [ Doctoral dissertation]. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck C. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski M. Creative mindsets: measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2014;8(1):62–70. doi:10.1037/a0034898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna S Innovative Mindset. In: Somani A, Ramakrishna S, Chaudhary A, Choudhary C, Agarwal B. editors. Emerging Technologies in Computer Engineering: Microservices in Big Data Analytics. ICETCE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol. 985. Singapore: Springer; 2019. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8300-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig K. Artificial intelligence changes the world of work: how a growth mindset can help social sciences and humanities graduates succeed. Newcastle University; 2021. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3901860.
   Google Scholar
• Beer JM, Fisk AD, Rogers WA. Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. J Hum Rob Interact. 2014;3(2):74. doi:10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castelo N, Schmitt B, Sarvary M. Human or robot? Consumer responses to radical cognitive enhancement products. J Assoc Consum Res. 2019;4(3):217–230. doi:10.1086/703462.
   Google Scholar
• McTear M. Conversational AI: dialogue systems, conversational agents, and chatbots. USA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Springer Nature; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Haladjian HH, Montemayor C. Artificial consciousness and the consciousness-attention dissociation. Conscious Cogn. 2016;45:210–225. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Huang JS. Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technol Soc. 2020;63:101410. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo T, Helberger N, Kruikemeier S, De Vreese CH. In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI Soc. 2020;35(3):611–623. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini S. Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): a brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Front Phychol. 2023;14:1191628. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson J, Rainie L, Luchsinger A. Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Pew Res Cent. 2018;10(12):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schepman A, Rodway P. The General attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale (GAAIS): confirmatory validation and associations with personality, corporate distrust, and general trust. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2023;39(13):2724–2741. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Soc Cognition. 2007;25(5):582–602. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2002;46(2):186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Woo SE. Who likes artificial intelligence? Personality predictors of attitudes toward artificial intelligence. J Phychol. 2022;156(1):68–94. doi:10.1080/00223980.2021.2012109.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf MM, Allouch SB. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robot Auton Syst. 2013;61(12):1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot. 2009;1(4):319–330. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Dafoe A. Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. 2019 [accessed 2024 June 3]. 26. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3312874.
   Google Scholar
• Kim A, Cho M, Ahn J, Sung Y. Effects of gender and relationship type on the response to artificial intelligence. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(4):249–253. doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford J, Allen KA, Pani B, Cowling M. When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. High Educ Stud. 2024;49(5):1–15. doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2326956.
   Google Scholar
• Abdaljaleel M, Barakat M, Alsanafi M, Salim NA, Abazid H, Malaeb D, Sallam M, Hassan BAR, Wayyes AM, Farhan SS, Khatib SE. A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1983. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi M, Choi H. What drives the acceptance of AI technology?: the role of expectations and experiences. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13670: 2023 [accessed 2024 June 3]. p. 1–21. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.13670.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow E. Mindset matters: how mindset affects the ability of staff to anticipate and adapt to artificial intelligence (AI) future scenarios in organisational settings. AI Soc. 2021;36(3):895–909. doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01101-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Payne BH, Williams R, Park HW, Breazeal C. International workshop on education in artificial intelligence k12; California. Vol. 2. (CA): MIT Media Lab Palo Alto; 2019. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Park HW, Rosenberg-Kima R, Rosenberg M, Gordon G, Breazeal C. Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; Vienna Austria. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya F, Aydin F, Schepman A, Rodway P, Yetişensoy O, Demir Kaya M. The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Int J Hum–Comput Interact. 2024;40(2):497–514. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Wei CL, Lin HH, Wang SC, Wang YS. What drives students’ AI learning behavior: a perspective of AI anxiety. Interact Learn Environ. 2022; 1–17. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2153147.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Huang L, Zhou X, Li X, Shi G, Ying J, Wang C. Could AI ethical anxiety, perceived ethical risks and ethical awareness about AI influence university students’ use of generative AI products? An ethical perspective an ethical perspective. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2024; 1–23. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koponen K. Acceptance of generative AI in knowledge work [ dissertation]. Finland: Tampere University Information and Knowledge Management; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler U. Extremes of acceptance: employee attitudes toward artificial intelligence. J Bus Strategy. 2020;41(5):39–45. doi:10.1108/JBS-12-2018-0204.
   Google Scholar
• Karakelle S, Saraç S. Yaratici zihniyet yapilari ölçeği: türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalişmasi. Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi. 2022;4(2):122–129. doi:10.35365/ctjpp.22.2.01.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YY, Wang YS. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: an initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;30(4):619–634. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi R. An adaptation of artificial intelligence anxiety scale into Turkish: reliability and validity study. Int Online J Educ Sci Teach. 2020;7(4):1501–1515.
   Google Scholar
• Schepman A, Rodway P. Initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2020;1:100014. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agba MS, Rijami J. Data integrity in research: a fundamental prerequisite for credible research output across disciplines and professions. Int J Democracy Devel Stud. 2022;5(2):31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan KS, Manoj K. Outlier detection in multivariate data. Appl Math Sci. 2015;47(9):2317–2324. doi:10.12988/ams.2015.53213.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin J, Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: I. Biometrika. 1950;37(3–4):409–428. doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. New York: Sage Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a Silver Bullet. J Mark Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (NY): Routledge; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub DW. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. Mis Q. 1997;21(4):389–400. doi:10.2307/249720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn P, Scheutz M, Crowell CR. Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males? Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction; Amsterdam The Netherlands. 2008. p. 263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YS, Wu MC, Wang HY. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Br J Educ Technol. 2009;40(1):92–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. Mis Q. 2000; 115–139. doi:10.2307/3250981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, J S, L P, Hofmann F, Gläser-Zikuda M. Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. Int J Educ Technol In Higher Educ. 2023;20(1):49. doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fietta V, Zecchinato F, Di Stasi B, Polato M, Monaro M. Dissociation between users’ explicit and implicit attitudes toward artificial intelligence: an experimental study. IEEE Trans on Hum Mach Syst. 2021;52(3):481–489. doi:10.1109/THMS.2021.3125280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Lee Y. Investigation into the influence of socio-cultural factors on attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;29(8):1–29. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12172-y.
   Google Scholar
• Chou C, Condron L, Belland JC. A review of the research on internet addiction. Educ Phychol Rev. 2005;17(4):363–388. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-8138-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su W, Han X, Jin C, Yan Y, Potenza MN. Are males more likely to be addicted to the internet than females? A meta-analysis involving 34 global jurisdictions. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;99:86–100. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F. Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2005;4(2):146–155. doi:10.1007/s10209-005-0118-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Gal H C. Artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in primary care during the coronavirus pandemic: what is the role of patients’ gender, age and health awareness? A two-phase pilot study. Front Public Health. 2023;10:931225. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.931225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin D, Yilmaz RM. The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Comput Educ. 2020;144:103710. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nora A, Snyder BP. Technology and higher education: the impact of e-learning approaches on student academic achievement, perceptions and persistence. J Coll Student Retent: Res. Theory Pract. 2008;10(1):3–19. doi:10.2190/CS.10.1.b.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Dweck CS. Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educ Psychologist. 2012;47(4):302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayanwale MA, Sanusi IT, Adelana OP, Aruleba KD, Oyelere SS. Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Comput Educ: Artif Intel. 2022;3:100099. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw SS, Huang HM. How factors of personal attitudes and learning environments affect gender difference toward mobile learning acceptance. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2015;16(4). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak Y, Seo YH, Ahn JW. Nursing students’ intent to use ai-based healthcare technology: path analysis using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105541. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer J, Ringer A, Saville K, A Parris M, Kashi K. Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Educ. 2022;83(2):317–338. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5.
   Google Scholar
• Montag C, Kraus J, Baumann M, Rozgonjuk D. The propensity to trust in (automated) technology mediates the links between technology self-efficacy and fear and acceptance of artificial intelligence. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2023;11:100315. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100315.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YF, Hwang GJ, Chen PY. Impacts of an ai-based chatbot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educ Technol Res Devel. 2022;70(5):1843–1865. doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang F, Zheng L, Jiao P. Artificial intelligence in online higher education: a systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(6):7893–7925. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar