Assessing Our Students Assessing Their Students: Support and Impact of Preservice Teachers on P–5 Student Learning

References

• Australian Council for Educational Research. (2010). Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Retrieved from http://ausse.acer.edu.au/images/docs/AUSSE_2009_Student_Engagement_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bao, L. (2006). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. Physics Education Research, 74, 917–922.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. doi:10.3102/01623709353129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broaddus, K. (2000). From peacemaker to advocate: A preservice teacher's case study of an emergent reader. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(4), 571–597. doi:10.1080/10862960009548096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. (2012). The impact of pre-service teachers on the mathematics achievement and attitudes of elementary students at a Colorado school (Paper Code: CLA04478). Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Colettaa, V. P., & Phillips, J. A. (2005). Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability. American Journal of Physics, 73, 1172–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Education. (n.d.). Motto for Georgia Southern University. Retrieved from http://coe.georgiasouthern.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2013). CAEP accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/accreditation/standards/.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2003a, October). The effects of initial teacher education on teacher quality. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2003b). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation, Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2006). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2009). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession—Remarks of Secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10222009.html
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, E. (2010). Exploring young children's (mathematical) thinking: Preservice teachers reflect on the use of the one-to-one interview. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(4), 331–347.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. M. (2010). Through the eyes of the preservice teacher. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Good, J. M., & Whang, P. A. (2002). Encouraging reflection in preservice teachers through response journals. The Teacher Educator, 37(4), 254–267. doi:10.1080/08878730209555299
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, K. J., & Navarrete, L. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., Drew, S., & Smith, M. (2006). The first-year experience: A review of literature for the Higher Education Academy. Sheffield, UK: Centre for Research and Evaluation, Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick, W. B. (1999). Preservice teachers tutoring 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders one-on-one within the school setting. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3), 211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC). (1992). InTASC's model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC). (2013). InTASC: Model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, J. G. (1992). Models for understanding preservice and beginning teachers' biographies: Illustrations from case studies. In L. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers' lives (pp. 99–152). New York. NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J. (2007). It's not just about teaching kids to read: Helping preservice teachers acquire a mindset for teaching children in urban communities. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 411–443. doi:10.1080/10862960701675291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, J., & Cummings, K. (2007). Normalized change. American Journal of Physics, 75, 87–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measures of Effective Teaching Project. (2009). Measures of effective teaching. Retrieved from www.metproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Mewborn, D. S. (2001). The role of mathematics content knowledge in the preparation of elementary teachers in the United States. Journal of Mathematical Teacher Development, 3, 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. (2013). Creating reflective practitioners with preservice lesson study. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2014). National Board professional teaching standards. Retrieved from www.nbpts.org
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2006). What makes a teacher effective? A summary of key research findings on teacher preparation. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=JFRrmWqa1jU%3d&tabid=361
   Google Scholar
• Penn-Edwards, S., & Donnison, S. (2011). Engaging with higher education academic support: A first year student teacher transition model. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 566–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. (n.d.). NVIVO (Version 10) [Computer software]. Burlington, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schalock, D., Schalock, M., & Myton, D. (1998). Effectiveness—along with quality—should be the focus. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(6), 648–670.
   Google Scholar
• Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., & Ayres, R. (2006). Scaling up research in teacher education: New demands on theory, measurement, and design. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 102–119. doi:10.1177/0022487105285615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, L., & Walsh, D. (2009). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. L., & Strahan, D. (1997). Preservice middle-level teachers' orientations toward teaching: Case studies in professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(2), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers' experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf
   Google Scholar