Developing Embedded Signature Assessments for Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education

References

• Admiraal, W., Janssen, T., Huizenga, J., Kranenburg, F., Taconis, R., & Corda, A. (2014). E-assessment of student-teachers’ competence as new teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (2017). edTPA state policy participation map. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/state-policy
   Google Scholar
• Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2013, April). Policy points: A nation at risk? Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/policypoints/policypoints-a-nation-at-risk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, C. C., Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., & Young, D. B. (2008). From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J., & Winslow, E. (2015). Curriculum-embedded performance assessments (CEPAs): Policy considerations for meaningful accountability. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557604.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, P. R., Young, D. B., Shavelson, R. J., Jones, R., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., … Furtak, E. M. (2008). Lessons learned from the process of curriculum developers’ and assessment developers’ collaboration on the development of embedded formative assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 390–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, R. (2001). Composing standards and composing teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California SB 2042. (1998, February 20). Retrieved from ftp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/97-98/bill/sen/sb_2001-2050/sb_2042_bill_19980918_chaptered.html
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S., Fullerton, J., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). National board certification and teacher effectiveness: Evidence from a random assignment experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14608
   Google Scholar
• Chung, R. R. (2008). Beyond assessment: Performance assessments in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2013). Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) standards. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from http://caepnet.org/∼/media/Files/caep/standards/caep-standards-one-pager-061716.pdf?la=en
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (1992). Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2011). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535859
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Wood, G. (2008). Assessment for the 21st century: Using performance assessments to measure student learning more effectively. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20100714155447/http://www.forumforeducation.org/files/u1/pba-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2015). Teachers’ use of assessment data to inform instruction: Lessons from the past and prospects for the future. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzo, G. R. (2005). Performance assessment and renewing teacher education: The possibilities of the NBPTS Standards. The Clearing House, 78(4), 142–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, D., & O’Hara, K. E. (2015). Buyer beware: Lessons learned from EdTPA implementation in New York state. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(2), 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, K., Chittenden, E., Spicer, W., Jones, J., & Tocci, C. (1997). Professional development in the context of National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification: Implications beyond certification. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED412257
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, L. R., & Calfee, R. C. (2005). Assessing teacher candidate growth over time: Embedded signature assessments. The Clearing House, 78(4), 151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwell, K., & Oyler, C. (2016). Unstandardized responses to a “standardized” test: The edTPA as gatekeeper and curriculum change agent. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(2), 120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. D., & Young, T. V. (2013). The politics of accountability: Teacher education policy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 190–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2017). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science (Version 2.4.0). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, W., Van Petegem, P., & Engels, N. (2009). Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment in pre‐service teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 401–413. doi: 10.1080/02602930802062659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M., Carroll, D., Jancic, M., & Markworth, K. (2015). Developing a culture of learning around the edTPA: One university’s journey. The New Educator, 11(1), 37–59. doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2014.966401
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983, April). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: The Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Noel, A. M. (2014). Teacher performance assessment (edTPA): An instructor’s development and evaluation of an embedded signature assessment in an early childhood literacy course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(4), 357–372.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, K. A., & Powell, S. R. (2015). Is the edTPA the right choice for evaluating teacher readiness? Arts Education Policy Review, 116(2), 103–113. doi: 10.1080/10632913.2014.944964
   Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., & Chung, R. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22–36. doi: 10.1177/0022487105284045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., Pigg, M. J., Chung, R. R., & Souviney, R. J. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. The Clearing House, 78(4), 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C. A., Singer-Gabella, M., Sloan, T., & Lin, S. (2014). Driving blind: Why we need standardized performance assessment in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 8–30. doi: 10.3776/joci.2014.v8n1p8-30
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. H., & Gustafson, A. (2013). Using curriculum-embedded assessments of student learning: Establishing a model for internal benchmarking. Assessment Update, 25(2), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The case of national board certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 669–700. doi: 10.3102/0002831208316955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague, N. R. (2005). Quality toolbox (2nd ed.). ‎Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality (ASQ). Retrieved from http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpQTE00001/quality-toolbox-2nd-edition/quality-toolbox-2nd-edition
   Google Scholar
• Uhlenbeck, A. (2002). The development of an assessment procedure for beginning teachers of English as a foreign language [Dissertation]. University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., & Pecheone, R. L. (2010). Performance-based assessments as high-stakes events and tools for learning. In Handbook of teacher assessment and teacher quality (pp. 69–132). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, D. D. (1999). The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Can it live up to its promise? In M. Kawstoroom & C. Finn (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 163–197). Washington, DC: The Fordham Foundation.
   Google Scholar