The Many Faces of Teacher Differentiation: Using Q Methodology to Explore Teachers Preferences for Differentiated Instruction

References

• Aitken, J. L., & Mildon, D. (1991). The dynamics of personal knowledge and teacher education. Curriculum Inquiry, 21(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(Pt 2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. E., & DeWeese, B. (2015). Using the Q methodology approach in human resource development research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314559811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C., Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. (2005). The feasibility of high end learning in academically diverse middle schools (No. 05210).
   Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
   Google Scholar
• Duball, B., Baker, R. (1990). Attrition in TAFE: the influences of institutional variables. TAFE National Centre for Research and Development. http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A17297
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2008). Trainee teachers’ cognitive styles and notions of differentiation. Education + Training, 50(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810862128
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2010). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Godor, B. P. (2016). Moving beyond the deep and surface dichotomy; using Q methodology to explore students’ approaches to studying. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1136275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertberg-Davis, H. (2009). Myth 7: Differentiation in the regular classroom is equivalent to gifted programs and is sufficient: classroom teachers have the time, the skill, and the will to differentiate adequately. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42(2), 143–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 3), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X160778
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansen, E., & Bruinsma, M. (2005). Explaining achievement in higher education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500101173
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, R. N., & Reschly, A. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers’ viewpoints about an educational reform concerning multilingualism in German-speaking Switzerland. Learning and Instruction, 64, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2016). Rethinking differentiation—Using teachers’ time most effectively. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716666046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, B. F., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (1995). Pygmalion or Golem? Teacher affect and efficacy. College Composition and Communication, 46(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/358711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & O’Connor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 63, 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S. E., & Born, M. P. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9168-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. D., & Zhang, G. (2011). Classroom environments and student empowerment: An analysis of elementary and secondary teacher beliefs. Learning Environments Research, 14(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9091-1
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. (1994). Differentiation: From the perspective of resolving tensions between basic social values and assumptions about individual differences. Curriculum Studies, 2(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965975940020302
   Google Scholar
• Øverland, K., Størksen, I., & Thorsen, A. A. (2013). Daycare children of divorce and their helpers. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-012-0065-y
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Solomonides, I. (2007). Design students’ experience of engagement and creativity. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 6(1), 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. (2010). The schoolwide enrichment model: A focus on student strengths and interests. Gifted Education International, 26(2–3), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941002600303
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344720
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.717032
   Google Scholar
• Schmoker, M. (2010, September 29). When pedagogic fads Trump priorities. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/09/29/05schmoker.h30.html
   Google Scholar
• Severiens, S. E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9181-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurgeon, L., Humphreys, G., James, G., & Sackley, C. (2012). A Q-methodology study of patients' subjective experiences of TIA. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012, 486261. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/486261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1935). Correlating persons instead of tests. Journal of Personality, 4(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1935.tb02022.x
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology (5th Impression ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1993). Introduction to Q-methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 17(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2010, November 12). When pedagogical misinformation Trumps reason. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/11/17/12letter-b1.h30.html
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Exel, J., Baker, R., Mason, H., Donaldson, C., Brouwer, W, & EuroVaQ Team. (2015). Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology. Social Science & Medicine, 126, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A Clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. S., Craven, R. G., & Kaur, G. (2014). Teachers’ self-concept and valuing of learning: Relations with teaching approaches and beliefs about students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.905670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, S., & Sharkey, J. (2009). Testing a developmental-ecological model of student engagement: A multilevel latent growth curve analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(6), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903206815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabala, A. (2014). qmethod: A package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. A Peer-Reviewed, Open-Access Publication of the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 6(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-032
   Google Scholar