Self-Efficacy-Forming Experiences for Experienced Teachers Working with Multilingual Learners

References

• Bagwell, D. (2023). Efficacy-forming experiences: Contributing factors to the development of teacher self-efficacy in culturally and linguistically responsive practices. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Baquedano-López, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12459718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. S. (2020). Investigating the third space: A new agenda for teacher education research. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118787497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2010). Preparing mainstream secondary content-area teachers to facilitate English language learners’ development of academic language. Teachers College Record, 112(14), 351–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201404
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, C. A., Kayumova, S., & Allexsaht-Snider, M. (2013). Teacher, researcher, and accountability discourses: Creating space for democratic science teaching practices in middle schools. Democracy and Education, 21(2), 2. https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/2
   Google Scholar
• Calderón, M., Slavin, R., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. The Future of Children, 21(1), 103–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41229013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D. S. Y., & Morrison, P. (2014). Learning to get it right: Understanding change processes in professional development for teachers of English learners. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.806948
   Google Scholar
• Coady, M. R., Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2011). Preservice to practice: Mainstream teacher beliefs of preparation and efficacy with English language learners in the state of Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.597823
   Google Scholar
• Coady, M. R., Harper, C., & de Jong, E. J. (2015). Aiming for equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms? TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 340–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Villegas, A. M., Abrams, L., Chavez-Moreno, L., Mills, T., & Stern, R. (2015). Critiquing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114558268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031009013
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2008). ESL is good teaching “plus. In M. E. Brisk (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 127–148). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, E., & Naranjo, C. (2019). General education teacher educators and English language learner teacher preparation: Infusion as curricular change. The New Educator, 15(4), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2019.1663331
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) (2015). Pub.L.No. 114-95 § 114 Stat.1177 (2015-2016).
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–53). Center for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us?. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA (American Psychological Association) educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M. D., & Lachance, J. R. (2018). The national dual language education teacher preparation standards. Dual Language Education of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Hiatt, J. E., & Fairbairn, S. B. (2018). Improving the focus of English learner professional development for in-service teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 102(3), 228–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263651878926
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2009). English language teacher expertise: The elephant in the room. Language and Education, 23(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., & Bagwell, D. (2021). Supporting teachers working with English learners: Engagement and impact of a professional development program. TESOL Journal, 13(1), e632. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., & Bagwell, D. (2022). Collaborative learning through online professional development. The Teacher Educator, 58(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2022.2051155
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., & Prater, K. (2011). Collaboration in professional development for ELL content achievement. In C. J. Casteel & K. G. Ballantyne (Eds.), Professional Development in Action: Improving Teaching for English Learners (pp. 85–86). NCELA.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Wilson, D., Scott, A., & Zhao, X. (2019). Working with English learners using a two-generation approach. School Community Journal, 29(2), 63–80. http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hinman, T., & He, Y. (2017). Hybrid practices in the alternative learning spaces of community-based heritage language programs. New Waves, 20(1), 1–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1211315
   Google Scholar
• Hinman, T. B., He, Y., Wilson, S. M., Paschal, A. A., & Nelson, J. (2021). Challenges and strength-based strategies for cultivating a sense of belonging in a heritage language program. In B. S. Faircloth, L. M. Gonzalez, & K. Ramos (Eds.), Resisting Barriers to belonging: Conceptual critique and critical applications. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S. (1980). Response-shift bias: A problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Evaluation Review, 4(1), 93–106. https://ncela.ed.gov/files/fast_facts/ELDemographics_20220805_508.pdf https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8000400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishimaru, A. M. (2019). From family engagement to equitable collaboration. Educational Policy, 33(2), 350–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, E., Gronostaj, A., & Vock, M. (2019). Effective professional development for teachers to foster students’ academic language proficiency across the curriculum: A systematic review. AERA Open, 5(1), 233285841982869. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419828691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B. & He, Y. (2008). Investigating the content and sources of preservice teachers’ personal practical theories (PPTs). Journal of Teacher Education. 59(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107310749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 606–636). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., Strom, K., Bratkovich, M., & Wnuk, J. (2018). Inservice preparation for mainstream teachers of English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1420852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Department of Public Instruction [NCDPI]. (2022). Language diversity in North Carolina. ML (Multilingual Learner) Identification & Data. https://www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/classroom-resources/academic-standards/programs-and-initiatives/dual-language-immersion
   Google Scholar
• Office of English Language Acquisition [OELA]. (2022). English learners: Demographic trends. U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028398.80108.87
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M., Darling-Hammond, L., Cheuk, T. (2012). Teacher development to support English language learners in the context of common core state standards [Paper presentation]. Understanding Language Conference, Stanford, CA. http://ell.stanford.edu/papers
   Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy-forming experiences: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.487081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O., & Starker, T. V. (2010). Predicting preservice teachers’ self-efficacy to resolve a cultural conflict involving an African American student. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210961003641302
   Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O., Chesnut, S. R., Alejandro, A. Y., & Young, H. A. (2016). Examining preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy doubts. The Teacher Educator, 51(4), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2016.1192709
   Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O., Putman, S. M., Starker-Glass, T. V., & Lewis, C. W. (2017). The culturally responsive classroom management self-efficacy scale: Development and initial validation. Urban Education, 52(7), 862–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208591560253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Smit, J., Nigam, A., Finch, B., & Burke, D. (2022). [Critical] Multilingual and Multicultural Awareness in the Pedagogical Responsiveness of Literacy Educators. Berkeley Review of Education, 11(1), 5–40. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85k213fn https://doi.org/10.5070/B811145763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Téllez, K., & Waxman, H. C. (2005). Quality teachers for English language learners. A review of the research. Laboratory for Student Success (LSS), The Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• TESOL International Association [TESOL]. (2019). Standards for initial TESOL pre-K-12 teacher preparation programs. https://www.tesol.org/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2019). American community survey. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=language%20spoken%20at%20home&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S1601
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, G., Bunch, G. C., Snow, C. E., & Lee, C. (2005). Enhancing the development of students’ language(s). In L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, P. LePage, K. Hammerness, & H. Duffy (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 126–168). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M., SaizdeLaMora, K., Martin, A. D., & Mills, T. (2018). Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1420850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar