Elder-Cottage Housing: A Housing Alternative for the Older Population

References

• American Association of Retired Persons. (1987). Understanding senior housing: An American Association of Retired Persons survey of consumer’s preferences, concerns, and needs (Consumer Affairs Section No. PF 3882 [287]). Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, L.E., & Miller, G. R. (1985). ECHO Housing Fact Sheet {Consumer Affairs Section No. PF 3575 [685]). Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, W.R., Leigh, G.K., Day, R.D., & Constantine, J. (1979). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F.l. Nye, & I.L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary Theories About the Family (pp. 42–60). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demkovich, L.E. (1979). In treating the problems of the elderly there may be no place like home. National Journal, 11 (51–52), 2154–2158.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Gilly, M.C., & Zeithaml. (1985). The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353–357.
   Google Scholar
• Guion, E.W. (1982). Granny flats: Easing the housing crunch for the elderly. The Futurist, 16(1), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Guion, E.W. (1983, December/1984, January). Elder cottages: A new feature on the housing horizon. Aging (No. 342, pp. 9–11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, A. (1983). Elderly housing: Innovative alternatives. In Hearing before the Subcommittee on Housing and Consumer Interests of the Select Committee on Aging, House of Representatives (Comm. Pub. No. 98–434, pp. 27–31). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, P.H. (1982). Why granny flats are a good idea. Planning, 48(2), 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, P.H., & Haske, M. (1983, December/I984, January). Innovative living arrangements: A source of long-term care. Aging (No. 342, pp. 191–196). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, P.H., & Haske, M. (1986). Empty nests and unmet needs: Brokering the exchange of services for housing. Perspectives on Aging, 15(5), 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, P.H., & Hollis, L.E. (1985). A model ordinance for E.C.H.O. housing (PF 3261 [1085]). Washington, DC: American Association for Retired Persons.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, L. (Ed.). (1984). Housing options for older Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for Retired Persons.
   Google Scholar
• John, D.R., & Cole, C.A. (1986). Age differences in information processing: Understanding deficits in young and elderly consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Junk, V.W., Junk, W.S., & Jones, J.C. (1987). Impact of energy audits on home energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 11 (1), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Levin, M.L., & Hamilton, H. (1963). Traditions of research on the diffusion of innovation. American Sociological Review, 28(2), 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, J. (1986). Elderly housing options: A blueprint for the future. In Joint Hearing before the Select Committee on Aging and the Subcommittee on Housing and Consumer Interests of the Select Committee on Aging, House of Representatives (Comm. Pub. No. 99–559, pp. 2–3). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Makela, C.J. (Ed.). (1989). Housing and locational decisions: Thinking ahead to retirement. Fort Collins: Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Makela, C.J., Chatelain, L.B., Dillman, D.A., Dillman, J.J., & Tripple, P.A. (1982). Energy directions for the United States: A western perspective. (WRDC Publication No 13). Corvallis, OR: Western Rural Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, J.W., & Weber, M. (1981). Factors affecting the diffusion of two energy efficient innovative housing systems. Housing and Society, 8(2), 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S.J. (1985). The shape of things to come: Housing policy for the elderly. Generations, 7(3), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bryant, S.L. (1982). The value of home to older persons: Relationship to housing satisfaction. Research on Aging, 4(3), 349–363.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, J.M. (1986). Housing alternatives for the elderly. Family Economics Review (No. 3, pp. 1–7). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Poliak, P.B. (1987). Housing options for seniors today. Aging (No. 356, pp. 2–5). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, C.G., & Portney, F.C. (1985). Developing a continuum of housing programs: A foundation’s role. Generations, 9(3), 56–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, R. (1981). The age of the aging. Progressive Architecture, 62(8), 59–63.
   Google Scholar