Subprime Lending and Reverse Redlining

References

• Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. (2000, October). Separate and unequal: Predatory lending in America. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.acorn.org
   Google Scholar
• Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. (2001, November). Separate and unequal: Predatory lending in America. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.acorn.org/acorlO/predatorylending/plreports/report.htm
   Google Scholar
• Center for Community Change. (2002). Predatory lending: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.community change.org/NRP/hmda.html
   Google Scholar
• Citibank. (2002). Tell Citibank: What is predatory lending? Retrieved November 27,2002, from http://www.tellcitibank.org/predatorylending.htm
   Google Scholar
• Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina. (2002). Community guide to predatory lending research. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http:// www.cra-nc.org/research
   Google Scholar
• Courchane, M., Nebhut, D., & Nickerson, D. (2000). Lessons learned: Statistical techniques and fair lending. Journal of Housing Research, 11 (2), 277-795.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. (2002). Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.ffiec.gov/hmda/
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. E. (1971). Black ghettos, white ghettos, and slums. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2000). Minority housing segregation: A test of three perspectives. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(1), 15-35.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. R (2001). Predatory lending recognized as a basis for civil-rights claim. New Jersey Law Journal, 765(5), 1.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows: Step by step. (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. R., & Wyly, E. K. (2001). The color of money expanded: Geographically contingent mortgage lending in Atlanta. Journal of Housing Research, 72(1), 55-90.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, A., & Horvitz, P. (1997). Lending discrimination claims and the issue of redlining: Analysis of lending patterns for an individual institution. Journal of Forensic Economics, 10(1), 51-63.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Ohio. (2002). Predatory lending factsheet. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.cohhio.org/predatoryfactsheets.html
   Google Scholar
• Huck, R (2001). Home mortgage lending by applicant race: Do HMDA figures provide a distorted picture? Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 719-736.
   Google Scholar
• Jesuit Social and International Ministries. (2000). Predatory lending preys on vulnerable communities. [Backgrounder Brochure]. Chicago, IL: JSIM.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in mortgage lending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 41-62.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family and society. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Munnell, A. H., Browne, L. E., McEneaney, J., & Tootell, G. M. B. (1992). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Working Paper No. 92-7.
   Google Scholar
• Munnell, A. H., Tootell, G. M. В., Browne, L. E., & McEneaney, J. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. The American Economic Review, 86(1), 25-53.
   Google Scholar
• National Training and Information Center. (2001). NTIC PLIP Project takes on predatory lending for a second year. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http: //www.ntic-us.org/publications/reports/Isuue_83_fall_2001/preda-ntic
   Google Scholar
• Perle, E., Lynch, К., & Horner, J. (1993). Model specification and local mortgage market behavior. Journal of Housing Research, 4(2), 225-242.
   Google Scholar
• Quercia, R. G, & Rohe, W. M. (1992). Housing adjustments among older homeowners. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28(1), 104-125.
   Google Scholar
• S&FA Capital Services. (1998). From testing to conclusions. Alexandria, VA: S&FA Capital Services, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1993). A tale of two cities: Racial and ethnic geographic disparities in home mortgage lending in Boston and Philadelphia. Journal of Housing Research, 4(2), 245-275.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (1998). Bank lending to minority and low-income households and neighborhoods: Do community reinvestment agreements make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), 269-301.
   Google Scholar
• Straka, J. W. (2000). A shift in the mortgage landscape: The 1990s move to automated credit evaluations. Journal of Housing Research, 11(2), 207-232.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, S. A., & Grace-Martin, К. (2003). Data analysis with SPSS: A first course in applied statistics. (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 summary file. Retrieved October 27, 2002, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=DEC&_lang=en&_ts=
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2000, April). Unequal burden in Atlanta: Income and racial disparities in subprime lending. Retrieved November 27,2002, from http://www.hud.gov/library/bookshelfl 8/ pressrel/subpratl.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (2001). Hearing on predatory lending: The problem, impact, and responses. Second hearing in a series (testimony of David Berenbaum). Retrieved November 29, 2002, from http://www.senate.gov/~banking/01 _07hrg/072701/brenbaum.htm
   Google Scholar
• Walters, R. (1996). The criticality of racism. Black Scholar, 26(1), 1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Woodstock Institute. (1999). Two steps back: The dual mortgage market, predatory lending, and the undoing of community development. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.woodstock.org/predatory/lending.html
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, J. (1998). Housing discrimination is still worth worrying about. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 893-927.
   Google Scholar