The impact of an adequate public facilities ordinance on the sale price of single-family housing in Cabarrus County, North Carolina

References

• Anderson, S. T., & West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 773–789. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. (2006). State growth management and housing prices. Social Science Quarterly, 87(1), 122–141. doi:10.1111/ssqu.2006.87.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, B. M., & Coursey, D. L. (2000). An examination of the effects of impact fees on Chicago’s suburbs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Been, V. (2005). Impact fees and housing affordability. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 8(1), 139–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., Fletcher, J. O., & Nelson, K. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 271–286. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zadok, E. (2005). Consistency, concurrency and compact development: Three faces of growth management implementation in Florida. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2167–2190. doi:10.1080/00420980500332015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. M., Mikelbank, B. A., & Prestegaard, D. M. (2001). Theoretical and empirical considerations regarding space in hedonic housing price model applications. Growth and Change, 32(4), 466–490. doi:10.1111/grow.2001.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. B., & Colwell, P. F. (1982). Housing price indexes. Research in Real Estate, 2(1), 57–84.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. V. (1982). The specification of hedonic indexes for urban housing. Land Economics, 58, 96–108. doi:10.2307/3146079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. S., & Munroe, D. K. (2007). Greenways and greenbacks: The impact of the Catawba regional trail on property values in Charlotte, North Carolina. Southeastern Geographer, 47(1), 118–137. doi:10.1353/sgo.2007.0002
   Google Scholar
• Chin, H. C., & Foong, K. W. (2006). Influence of school accessibility on housing values. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(3), 120–129. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:3(120)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, T. L., & Chau, K. W. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27(2), 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. E., & Lahr, M. (2005). Gracing the land of Elvis and Beale Street: Historic designation and property values in Memphis. Real Estate Economics, 33, 487–507. doi:10.1111/reec.2005.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. E., & McMillen, D. P. (2008). Estimating time, age and vintage effects in housing prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 17(2), 138–151. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. J., & Smith, M. T. (1989a). Impact fees and the price of new housing: An empirical study. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 17(1), 41–54. doi:10.1111/1540-6229.00472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. J., & Smith, M. T. (1989b). Pricing implications of development exactions on existing housing stock. Growth and Change, 20(4), 1–12. doi:10.1111/grow.1989.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (2003). Why Florida’s concurrency principles (for controlling new development by regulating road construction) do not – and cannot – work effectively. Transportation Quarterly, 57(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dresch, M., & Sheffrin, S. M. (1997). Who pays for development fees and exactions? San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (1990). Introduction: Four maxims for research on land-use controls. Land Economics, 66(3), 229–236. doi:10.2307/3146725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (1991). Comment on Anthony Downs’s “The advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing: Its behavior and accomplishments”. Housing Policy Debate, 2(4), 1139–1160. doi:10.1080/10511482.1991.9521083
   Google Scholar
• Graves, P., Murdoch, J. C., Thayer, M. A., & Waldman, D. (1988). The robustness of hedonic price estimation: Urban air quality. Land Economics, 64(3), 220–233. doi:10.2307/3146246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D., & Hogan, T. (2007). Sunbelt growth and the knowledge economy: An exploratory analysis. A report from the Productivity and Prosperity Project (P3), Supported by the Office of the University Economist at Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, F. E., Nelson, A. C., Smith, M. T., & Stegman, M. A. (1988). Who bears the burden of development impact fees? Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(1), 49–55. doi:10.1080/01944368808977152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2002). Oh no! I got the wrong sign! What should I do? Department of Economics Discussion Paper, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2011). Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: A literature review. Journal of Planning Literature, 26(1), 35–47. doi:10.1177/0885412210382985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansford, N. H., & Jones, L. L. (1995). Marginal price of lake recreation and aesthetics: An hedonic approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 27(1), 212–223.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J. C. (1994). Equity in infrastructure finance: When are impact fees justified? Land Economics, 70(2), 210–222. doi:10.2307/3146323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpezzi, S. (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), 209–241.
   Google Scholar
• Malpezzi, S. (2003). Hedonic price models: A selective and applied review. In T. O’Sullivan & K. Gibb (Eds.), Housing economics & public policy. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, S., Waddell, P., & Blanco, H. (2004). The effect of impact fees on the price of new single-family housing. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1303–1312. doi:10.1080/0042098042000214806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., Pendall, R., Dawkins, C. J., & Knaap, G. J. (2002). The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, A., & Schaffer, M. (2007). Clustered errors in Stata. A presentation from RePEc. Retrieved from SSRN: http://repec.org/usug2007/crse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ottensmann, J. R., Payton, S., & Man, J. (2008). Urban location and housing prices within a hedonic model. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, R. B. (1984). Estimating the demand for the characteristics of housing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 394–404. doi:10.2307/1924995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142. doi:10.1080/01944360008976094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollakowski, H. O., & Wachter, S. M. (1990). The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land Economics, 66(3), 315–324. doi:10.2307/3146732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang, D. A., & Grudnitski, G. (1995). Golf courses and residential house prices: An empirical examination. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10(3), 261–270. doi:10.1007/BF01096941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, W. H. (2006). A market for institutions: Assessing the impact of restrictive covenants on housing. Land Economics, 82(4), 500–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55. doi:10.1086/jpe.1974.82.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H. (2005). Regulations and housing development: What we know. Cityscape, 8(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Singell, L. D., & Lillydahl, J. H. (1990). An empirical examination of the effect of impact fees on the housing market. Land Economics, 66(1), 82–92. doi:10.2307/3146685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., & Dong, G. (2014). Valuing the “green” amenities in a spatial context. Journal of Regional Science, 54(4), 569–585. doi:10.1111/jors.2014.54.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinger, J. (1998). The incidence of development fees and special assessments. National Tax Journal, 51(1), 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar