Participatory processes in designing cohousing communities: the case of the community project

References

• Bamford, G. (2001). Bringing us home: cohousing and the environmental possibilities of reuniting people with neighbourhoods. Situating the environment 2001 conference proceedings (pp. 36–43). St Lucia: The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Barrucci, P., Burchi, S., Busato, A., Paone, S., & Ruggeri, F. (2013). Co-Abitanza: Le condizioni di capacitazione dei soggetti attraverso le politiche della casa. Retrived from http://www.yumpu.com/it/document/view/15295369/coabitanza-laboratorio-di-abitanza-sociale
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, S., Coates, C., Field, M., & How, J. (2011). Cohousing in Britain. London: Diggers and Dreamers.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. US: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (1999). Community by covenant, process, and design: Cohousing and the contemporary common interest community. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 15(1), 3–54. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42842738
   Google Scholar
• Field, M. (2004). Thinking about cohousing. The creation of intentional neighborhoods. London: Diggers and Dreamers.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparini, A. (2000). La sociologia degli spazi. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2011). Saving space, sharing time: Integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing. Environment and Planning, 43(3), 560–577. doi:10.1068/a43296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2014). Community-led housing and “slow” opposition to corporate development: Citizen participation as common ground? Geography Compass, 9(4), 202–213. doi:10.1111/gec3.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2015). Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia). Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 93–105. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karn, J. (2004). Narratives of neglect. Community, regeneration and the governance of security. Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, A. (2003). Redefining social and environmental relations at the ecovillage at Ithaca: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 323–332. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. (2011). Community development. A critical approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. (2007). Cohousing e condomini solidali. Florence: Editrice Aam Terranuova.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. (2010). Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 576–580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. (2011). Il cohousing: Origini, storia ed evoluzione in Europa e nel mondo. Retrieved from http://www.cohousingitalia.it/article8844.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1998). Cohousing. A contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (2011). Creating cohousing. Building sustainable community. Canada: New Society Publichers.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. (2000). Cohousing: Verifying the importance of community in the application of environmentalism. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 110–132. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. (2005). Sustainable Community. Learning from the Cohousing Model. Canada: Trafford.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelbach, F. G., & Ebin, J. (1975). Condominium housing: Some social and economic implications. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 3(2), 170–180. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol3/iss2/9
   Google Scholar
• Mutti, A. (1992). Il buon vicino. Rapporti di vicinato nella metropoli. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadier, T. (2003). Les représentations cognitives de l’espace: Modèles, méthodes et utilité. In G. Moser & K. Weiss (Eds.), Espaces de vie, Aspects de la relation homme-environnement (pp. 177–200). Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. (2013). La sottile linea del cohousing tra spazio pubblico e spazio privato: The Community Project. Sociologia urbana e rurale, XXXV(100), 105–118. doi:10.3280/SUR2013-100008
   Google Scholar
• Sargisson, L. (2010). Cohousing: A utopian property alternative? Retrieved 12 October 2012 from http://www.psa.ac.uk/2010/UploadedPaperPDFs/1225_1085.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scotthanson, C., & Scotthanson, K. (2005). The cohousing handbook. Building a place for community. Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Antonini, M. (2001). Our Common House: Using the Built Environment to Develop Supportive Communities. Unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate School, University of Florida. The UK Co-housing Network. Retrieved from http://www.co-housing.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small group. Psychological Bullettin, 63, 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: Why and how? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 64–78. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. (2000). From collective housing to cohousing - A summary of research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 164–178. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society (Vol. 1). USA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2005). Designing neighbourhoods for social interaction: The case of cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 195–227. doi:10.1080/13574800500086998
   Google Scholar