Constraints and opportunities for innovation in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program

References

• Abravanel, M., Smith, R., Turner, M., Cove, E., Harris, L., & Manjarrez. (2004). Testing public housing deregulation: A summary assessment of HUD’s “Moving to Work” demonstration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Scally, C. P. (2008). State innovations in affordable housing policy: Lessons from California and New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate, 19(4), 741–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310–319.
   Google Scholar
• Brick, C., & McCarty, M. (2012). Moving to Work (MTW): Housing assistance demonstration program. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Buron, L., Vandawalker, M., Morrill, T., Khadduri, J., Lubell, J., & Shivji, A. (2017). Testing performance measures for the moving to work program. Cheshire, CT: HAI Group, Public and Affordable Housing Research Corporation (PAHRC).
   Google Scholar
• Cadik, E., & Nogic, A. (2010). Moving to work: Interim policy applications and the future of the demonstration. Washington, DC: U.S: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority. (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Columbus, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA). (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., Feiock, R. C., & Wassel, K. (2017). Urban pressures and innovations: Sustainability commitment in the face of fragmentation and inequality. Review of Policy Research, 34(5), 700–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Rubin, L., & Gray, R. W. (1999). The uses of discretionary authority in the public housing program. A baseline inventory of issues, policy, and practice. Washington, DC: U.S: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, G. (1996). Emerging strategies for revitalizing public housing communities. Housing Policy Debate, 7(3), 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2010). Sharp expansion of HUD’s “Moving-To-Work” demonstration raises serious concerns. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2011). Expansion of HUD’s “Moving-To-Work” demonstration is not justified. Other approaches would promote demonstration’s goals more effectively. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2017a). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2017b). New report reinforces concerns about HUD’s moving to work demonstration. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A., & McElvein, E. H. (2015). Institutional innovation: How it happens and why it matters. Washington, DC: Brookings, Center for Effective Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, M., Simington, J., & Treskon, M. (2016). Moving to work and neighborhood opportunity. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Garboden, P. M., Rosen, E., DeLuca, S., & Edin, K. (2018). Taking stock: What drives landlord participation in the housing choice voucher program. Housing Policy Debate, 28(6), 979–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J., Lee, H. B., & McNamara, P. E. (2018). Performance of small public housing authorities: Opportunities and barriers. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 20(3), 257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, J. (2012). Beyond HOPE VI: Demolition/Disposition and the uncertain future of public housing in the US. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(3), 373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, J. (2017). The origins of the rental assistance demonstration program and the end of public housing. Housing Policy Debate, 27(4), 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, C. M., O’Reilly, P. L., & Inwood, G. L. (2006). Intergovernmental innovation and the administrative state in Canada. Governance, 19(4), 627–649.
   Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J., Vandawalker, M., Cohen, R., Lubell, J., Buron, L., Freiman, L., & Kean, E. (2014). Innovations in the moving to work demonstration. Cambridge, MA and Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., Airgood-Obrycki, W., & Yerena, A. (2019). Public housing authorities in the private market. Housing Policy Debate, 29, 670–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Page, S. B. (2008). Public housing authorities under devolution. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Page, S. B. (2015). The changing role of public housing authorities in the affordable housing delivery system. Housing Studies, 30(4), 621–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Rohe, W. M. (2005). Using public housing to achieve self-sufficiency: Can we predict success?. Housing Studies, 20(1), 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, J. (2016). Preserving and expanding affordability in neighborhoods experiencing rising rents and property values. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 18(3), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTW Steering Committee. (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO). (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T., Rohe, W. M., & Cowan, S. M. (2012). Entrenched hybridity in public housing agencies in the USA. Housing Studies, 27(4), 457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdorfer, E. (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Washington, DC: National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO).
   Google Scholar
• Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-134 § 204 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Operations Notice for the Expansion of the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration Program Solicitation of Comment Period 2017, 82 Fed. Reg., 8056–8080 (January 23, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Operations Notice for the Expansion of the Moving to Work Demonstration Program; Republication and Extension of Comment Period 2018, 83 Fed. Reg., 51474–51499 (October 11, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, R. (2018). Financing supportive services in assisted communities. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA). (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Kleit, R. G. (1997). From dependency to self-sufficiency: An appraisal of the Gateway Transitional Families Program. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 75–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Webb, M. D., & Frescoln, K. P. (2016). Work requirements in public housing; Impacts on tenant employment and evictions. Housing Policy Debate, 26(6), 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Lubell, J. (2000). How the statutory changes made by the quality housing and work responsibility Act of 1998 may affect welfare reform efforts. Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Thrope, D. (2016). Consolidating rental assistance administration would increase efficiency and expand opportunity. Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2017). Future prospects for public housing in the United States: Lessons from the rental assistance demonstration program. Housing Policy Debate, 27(5), 789–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrope, D. (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. San Francisco, CA: National Housing Law Project.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2012). Opportunities exist to improve information and monitoring. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2013). Moving to work demonstration. Improved information and monitoring could enhance program assessment. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M., Frescoln, K., & Rohe, W. M. (2015). Innovation in public housing. The moving to work demonstration. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M., Frescoln, K. P., & Rohe, W. M. (2016). Innovation in US public housing: A critique of the moving to work demonstration. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1), 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M., Frescoln, K. P., & Rohe, W. M. (2017). The MTW guide: Formulating strategies for successful participation. Cheshire, CT: HAI Group.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., & Meehan, J. (2017). Comments on operations notice for the expansion of the moving to work program. Bedford, NH: New Hampshire Housing Authorities Corporation.
   Google Scholar