Learning and Behaviorally Handicapped Students’ Perceptions of Instructional and Motivational Features of Computer Assisted Instruction

References

• Axelrod, S., McGregor, G., Sherman, S., & Hamlet, C. (1987). Effects of video games as reinforcers for computerized addition performance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, G. C., Richards, H. C., & Lancaster, P. (1987). Attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J., & Sterling, C. W. (1987). Equity in school computer use: National data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobko, D. J., Bobko, P., & Davis, M. (1983, August). A multidimensional scaling of videogames. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 1069–1077.
   Google Scholar
• Callison, D., & Haycock, G. (1988). A methodology for student evaluation of educational microcomputer software. Educational Technology, 28(1), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin, J. D., Maxwell, B., & Thompson, B. (1982). ARC-ED Curriculum: The application of video game formats to educational software. Exceptional Children, 49, 173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. A., & Gerber, M. M. (1986, March). Effects of game format in computerized drill and practice on development of automaticity in single digit addition for learning disabled students. (Technical Report No. 29). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Project TEECh.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17, 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E., (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from the media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, F. J. (1981). Affective considerations in computer-based education. Educational Technology, 21, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cosden, M. A. (1988). Microcomputer instruction and perceptions of effectiveness by special and regular education elementary school teachers. Journal of Special Education, 22, 242–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham, C., & Lieberman, A. (Eds). (1980). Time to learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., & Dwyer, D. J. (1984). Microcomputer videogame based training. Educational Technology 24(2), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Enochs, L. G. (1985-1986). General attitudes of middle school students toward computers. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 5(2), 56–57.
   Google Scholar
• EPIE (1988). The educational software selector (TESS): The 1988 supplement. Water Mill, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cohen, L. S., Deshaw, M. M., & Moore, J. E. (1978). Teaching and learning in elementary schools: A summary of the Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. San Francisco: Far West Labs.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, N. A. (1967). Estimating reliability. In E. J. Amidon & J. B. Hough (Eds.), Interaction analysis: Theory, research, and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J., Warren, B., Gillote, H., & Weaver, P. (1982, May/June). The name of the game is literacy. Classroom Computer News, 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, T., & Semmel, M. (1978). Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observational measures. Review of Educational Research, 48, 157–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. E., & Bates, P. (1989). Attitudes and attributions of educable mentally handicapped students on use of microcomputers in school. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, J. A., & Ewing, N. J. (1986). A comparison of the effectiveness of microcomputer and workbook instruction on reading comprehension performance of high incidence handicapped children. Educational Technology, 26(5), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbring, T. S. (1987, May). Effective microcomputer training and implementation. Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Special Education Software Center, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Hativa, N. (1989). Student conceptions of, and attitude toward, specific features of a CAI system. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(3), 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, M. (1988). Zaps, booms, and whistles in educational software. The Computing Teacher, 15(6), 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. M., Torgesen, J. K., & Sexton, M. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18(2), 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Haynes, J. A., & Malouf, D. (1986). Learning disabled students’ engaged time and classroom interaction: The impact of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Haynes, J. A., Malouf, D. B., Taymans, J., Mattson, B., & Dreifuss, S. (1985, October). Implementation of microcomputers in educational programs for mildly handicapped students. (Technical Report No. 107). College Park, MD: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol 3: Cognative and affective process analysis (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Malouf, D. B. (1987-88). The effect of instructional computer games on continuing student motivation. Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Okolo, C., & Owen, V. (1990). The effects of gender and learning disability on students’ computer experiences and attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Okolo, C., Rieth, H. J., & Bahr, C. (1989). Microcomputer implementation in secondary special education programs: A study of special educators’, mildly handicapped adolescents’, and administrators’ perspectives. Journal of Special Education, 23, 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poore, J. H., Qualls, J. E., & Brown, B. L. (1979). Basic skills in math for Florida high schools. Final Report. FSU PLATO Project. Tallahassee, FL: Computer Center, Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rieth, H. J., Bahr, C., Okolo, C., Polsgrove, L., & Eckert, R. (1988). An analysis of the impact of microcomputers on the secondary special education classroom ecology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 425–441
   Google Scholar
• Rieth, H. J., Bahr, C., Polsgrove, L., Okolo, C., & Eckert, R. (1987). The effects of microcomputers on the secondary special education classroom ecology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(4), 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rieth, H. J., Okolo, C., Polsgrove, L., Goh, S., & Eckert, R. (1987). MICROS Observational System. (Research Report No. 406). Nashville, TN: Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Rieth, H. J., Polsgrove, L., & Semmel, M. (1981). Instructional variables that make a difference: Attention to task and beyond. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2(3), 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 376–391). New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S. F., & Beck, I. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryba, K. A., & Chapman, J. W. (1983). Toward improving learning strategies and personal adjustment with computers. The Computing Teacher, 11(1), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Saracho, O. N. (1982). The effects of a computer-assisted instruction program on basic skills achievement and attitudes toward instruction of Spanish-speaking migrant children. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., Weinstein, T., Niemic, R., & Walberg, H. (1985-86). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 4, 493–501.
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., Smith, M. A., Harriman, N. E., Hale, R.L., & Wilson, R. J. (1986). Teacher effectiveness in special education programs. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Guerrero, F., Mitrani, M., & Schoener, J. (1990). Honing in on the target: Who among the educationally disadvantaged benefits most from what CBI? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22, 381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Trifiletti, J., Frith, G., & Armstrong, S. (1984). Microcomputers vs. resource rooms for learning disabled students: Apreliminary investigation of the effects on math skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 56(1), 69–76.
   Google Scholar