Sex Differences in Computer Attitudes and Beliefs Among Rural Middle School Children After a Teacher Training Intervention

References

• Alvarado, A. J. (1984). Computer education for ALL students. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. E., Welch, W. W., & Harris, J. (1984). Inequities in opportunities for computer literacy. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, N. J., & Perry, K. M. (1989, March). Sex and ethnic differences in high school students’ computer attitudes and computer attributions. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. (1986, April). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, A. F., Tucker, J., Hellinger, D., Layton, T., & Wolfe, L. R. (1986). Debugging the program—Computer equity strategies for the classroom teacher. PEER Computer Equity Action Kit 2. New York: NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Cusick, T., Johnson, P., & Wolfe, L. R. (1986). Beyond the Star Trek syndrome to an egalitarian future: “Where no one has gone before.” Washington, D.C.: PEER Computer Equity Report.
   Google Scholar
• Enochs, L.G. (1991). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. (1984). Access to computers. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hanchey, C., Eaton, V., Bell, S., Gallagher, S., & Nichol, L. (1990, June). Women in computer science: Are we failing in our efforts to recruit and retain them in the field? Panel presentation at the National Educational Computing Conference, Nashville.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. (1985). Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues. Sex Roles, 14(3/4), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, R. D., & Miura, I. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersteen, Z. A., Linn, M. C., Clancy, M., & Hardyck, C. (1986, April). Previous experience and the learning of computer programming: The computer helps those who help themselves. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Lautenberg, F. R. (1984). Equity in computer education. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C. (1985). Fostering equitable consequences from computer learning environments. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Women, girls, and computers: A first look at the evidence. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockheed, M. E., & Frakt, S. B. (1984). Sex equity: Increasing girls’ use of computers. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, W. M., & Winkle, L. W. (1982). Computer equity for young women in rural schools. Research in Rural Education, 1(1), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• McClenahan, J. (1989). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, D. (1986, June). The politics of educational technology. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Women’s Studies Association, Urbana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, D., Thurston, L. P., & McLellan, H. (1990, October). Training rural teachers in computer education: An evaluation of the distance learning methods. Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Miura, I. T. (1986a, April). Computer self-efficacy: A factor in understanding gender differences in computer course enrollment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, I. T. (1986b, April). Understanding gender differences in middle school computer interest and use. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, I. T., & Hess, R. D. (1984). Enrollment differences in computer camps and summer classes. The Computing Teacher, 11(8), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J.S. (1990). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• PEER. (1986, January/February). Sex bias at the computer terminal: How schools program girls. The Monitor, pp. 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. (1987). Do your female students say “No, thanks” to the computer? New York: Women’s Action Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. S., & Stone, A. (1986). The neuter computer: Computers for girls and boys. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, J. G. (1984, April). Females and microcomputer use in school: Some insights into traditional patterns. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, J. G. (1986a). Gender equity in computer learning. Theory into Practice, 25(4), 267–275.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, J. G. (1986b, January/February). Ideas about inequity in computer learning. The Monitor, pp. 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, L. P. (1989, June). Girls, computers, and amber waves of grain: Computer equity programming for rural teachers. Paper presented at National Women’s Studies Association Conference, Washington, DC (ERIC Document No. ED 319 660)
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, L.P., McGrath, D., & Stone, D. (1990). Bringing hitech to the heartland. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, L. P., & Stone, D. (1990, March). High tech in the heartland: Teachers designing computer activities for rural classrooms. Paper presented at National Rural and Small Schools Consortium, Tucson.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, M. C., & Stuck, M. F. (1985). Sex-role messages vis-a-vis microcomputer use: A look at the pictures. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, G., Mackie, D., & Cooper, J. (1985). Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar