The Effects of Technology on Online Education

References

• Ahern, T. C. (1993). The effect of a graphic interface on participation, interaction and student achievement in a computer-mediated small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 535–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, T. C., Peck, K., & Laycock, M. (1992). The effects of teacher discourse in computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(3), 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, B. O., Frisbee, A., & Patrick, K. R. (1989). Broadening the definition of distance education in the light of the new telecommunication technologies. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. D., Levin, J. A., Mehan, J. A., & Quinn, C. N. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. J. (1990). The evolution of distance learning: Technology-mediated interactive learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, I. (1988). Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. K. (1989). Online education: A new domain. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Computers, communication, and distance education (pp. 50–62). New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. M. (Ed.). (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, K., Neuwrith, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write. Written Communication, 8(1), 79–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shachar, H. (1990). Teachers’ verbal behavior in co-operative and whole-class instruction. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning (pp. 77–94). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, K. L., & Pinsonneault, A. (1990). Technology and groups: Assessment of the empirical research. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 375–405). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. A., Kim, H., & Riel, M. M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185–213). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Martson, P. J., & Hecht, M. L. (1988). Group satisfaction. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication (pp. 236–246). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milheim, W. D. (1991). Implementing distance education programs: Suggestions for potential developers. Educational Technology, 31(4), 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1987). University distance education of adults. TechTrends, 34(4), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. E. (1985). Composition as conversation: The computer terminal as medium of communication. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 203–227). New York: The Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment (1989). Linking for learning: A new course for education (Report No. OTA-SET-430). Washington, DC: U. S. Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, G. M., & Santoro, G. M. (1989). Teaching group discussion via computer-mediated communication. Communication Education, 38(2), 151–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, C., Mehan, H., Levin, J. A., & Black, S. D. (1983). Real education in non-real time: The use of electronic message systems for instruction. Instructional Science, 11, 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shale, D., & Garrison, D. R. (1990). Education and communication. In D. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance: From issues to practice (pp. 23–39). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff, S. B. (1988). Group interaction via communication rules. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication (pp. 50–64). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, B. (1990). The wired classroom: American education goes online. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(2), 109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Zigurs, I. (1989). Interaction analysis in GDSS research: Description of an experience and some recommendations. Decision Support Systems, 5, 233–241.
   Google Scholar