What Do Freehand and Computer-Facilitated Drawings Tell Teachers About the Children Who Drew Them?

References

• Anastasi, A., & Foley, J. P. (1936). An analysis of spontaneous drawings by children in different cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 680–726.
   Google Scholar
• Animation Station [Computer software]. (1984). Wheeling, IL: SunCom.
   Google Scholar
• Arkell, R. N. (1976). Naive prediction of pathology from human figure drawings. Journal of School Psychology, 14(2), 114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, W., & Hutchison, S. H. (1974). Self-image of the American Indian. International Journal of School Psychiatry, 20, 39–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buck, J. N. (1948). The H-T-P technique: A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 317–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A., & Sjoberg, B. (1964). The diagnostic validity of human figure drawings in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychology, 57, 3–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. V. (1972). Cross-gender identity in Barbados. Developmental Psychology, 6, 365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressen, R. (1975). Artistic quality of drawings and judges’ evaluations of the DAP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 132–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoud, F. S. (1976). First-drawn pictures: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 376–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, W. (1966). Group values through children’s drawings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DiLeo, J. H. (1970). Young children and their drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, L. M. (1985). Black and white children’s art: A cultural comparison. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 4612A. (University Microfilms No. AAC8603240)
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., & Fisher, R. (1950). Test of certain assumptions regarding figure drawing analysis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 727–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenburg, W. K., & Dodds, J. B. (1975). The Denver developmental screening test—Revised. Denver: LADOCA.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, H. W. (1969). A cross-cultural comparison of hostility in children’s drawings. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 261–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, H. W. (1974). Human figure drawings as indicators of value development among Thai children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 124–130.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough, F. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. Chicago: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, J. J., Wilkins, P., & Dawes, L. (1986). Acquiring cultural forms: Cognitive aspects of socialization illustrated by children’s drawings and judgment of drawings. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9(4), 485–505.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. B., & Roberts, J. (1972). Intellectual maturity of children: Demographic and sociometric factors (Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Vital and Health Statistics Series 11, No. 116). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. B. (1990). The scope and interjudge agreement of information communicated through children’s computer-facilitated and freehand drawings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia. (Dissertation Abstracts International Order Number 9024678)
   Google Scholar
• Hiler, E., & Nesvig, D. (1965). An evaluation of criteria used by clinicians to infer pathology from figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 520–529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howitt, P. S. (1984). Kinetic family drawings and clinical judgment: An evaluation of judges’ ability to differentiate between the KFDs of abusing, control, and concerned mothers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45,4504B. (University Microfilms No. ADG0554194)
   Google Scholar
• Hulse, W. C. (1951). The emotionally disturbed child draws his family. Quarterly Journal of Child Behavior, 3, 152–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ilg, F. L., & Ames, L. B. (1978). School readiness: Behavior tests used at the Gesell Institute. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jolles, I. (1971). A catalog for the qualitative interpretation of the House-TreePerson (H-T-P). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Klepsch, M. E. (1979). A validation study of the Draw-A-Teacher technique on third-grade children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Klepsch, M. E. (1980). Drawings as a measure of children’s attitudes to doctors, dentists, and nurses. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Klepsch, M., & Logie, L. (1982). Children draw and tell: An introduction to the projective uses of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Koppitz, E. M. (1984). Psychological evaluation of human figure drawings by middle school pupils. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlman, T. L. (1979). A validation study of the Draw-A-Person as a measure of racial identity acceptance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Laosa, L. M., Swartz, J. D., & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1974). Perceptual-cognitive and personality development of Mexican and Anglo-American children as measured by human figure drawings. Developmental Psychology, 10, 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (1983). Children’s kinetic family drawings and clinical judgment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 4401B.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Logo Computer Systems, Inc. (1983). IBM Logo [Computer software]. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Logo Computer Systems, Inc. (1984). Apple Logo II [Computer software]. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Logo Computer Systems, Inc. (1986). Logo Writer for the Apple II [Computer software]. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, B. (1979). Gender-role ideology and children’s drawings: Does the jacko-lantern smile or scare? Gender Roles, 5(1), 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, E. M. (1981). Sources of diagnostic error in detection of maladjusted children using human figure drawings (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Institute of Technology, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42,4203B.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N., & Shore, P. J. (1984). Awakening the inner eye: Intuition in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. (1980). Children’s perceptions of health and disease. Canadian Family Physician, 26, 1171–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, E., & Crannell, C. W. (1955). The ability of clinical psychologists to discriminate between drawings by deteriorated schizophrenics and drawings by normal subjects. Psychological Reports, 1, 153–158.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, H. T., & Phillips, P. D. (1974). A clinical note: The Kinetic School Drawing. Psychology in the Schools, 11, 303–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin, A. I., & Limuaco, J. A. (1959). Sexual differentiation of American and Filipino children as reflected in the Draw-A-Person Test. Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renchner, M. R. (1985). Children’s human figure drawings: A validity study of Koppitz’s criteria for the assessment of psychological traits by judges at different levels of clinical experience and training (Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 4604B.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L. D., & McGowan, J. F. (1959). The differentiation of human figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 129–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shearn, C. R., & Russell, K. R. (1970). Use of the family drawing technique for studying parent-child interaction. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 34, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, R. C., & Smart, M. S. (1975). Group values shown in preadolescents’ drawings in five English-speaking countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(1), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Swensen, C. H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957-1966. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touch Window [Computer input device]. (1985). Lilburn, GA: Touch Screens, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, W. H. (1963). The Draw-A-Person catalogue for interpretation and analysis. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wanderer, Z. (1969). Validity of clinical judgments based on human figure drawings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, I. D., Flannigan, M. W., & Rave, E. J. (1971). Children’s drawings: What they tell us about the way kids see schools. The Innovator, 2, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1984). Case-study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, A., & Shechori, H. (1970). Human figure drawing as a measure of social adjustment in school. Journal of School Psychology, 8, 152–153.
   Google Scholar