Technology Integration Practice as a Function of Pedagogical Expertise

References

• Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computing-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.
   Google Scholar
• Behets, D. (1996). Comparison of visual information processing between preservice students and experienced physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161–186). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Pubs.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarridge, P. B., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Perceptions of student behavior as a function of expertise. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. G., & Taylor, C. A. (1990). Hierarchical structures in expert performance. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(2), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Andris, M. (1995). Barrier to computer integration: Microinteraction among computer coordinators and classroom teachers in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(1), 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenk, M. W., Ellis, A. N., Hunt, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. (Eds.). (1990). The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, L. E., & Carter, K. (1996). Correspondence in cooperating teachers’ and student teachers’ interpretations of classroom events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers’ integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101, 261–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner, L. D., & Griffey, D. D. (1985). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56(1), 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M. (1985). What knowledge is of most worth to teachers? A knowledge-use perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 251–262.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1987). Teachers’ schemata for classroom events: The mental scaffolding of teachers’ thinking during classroom instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. P., & Welliver, P. W. (1989). Infusing educational technology into mainstream educational computing. International Journal of Instructional Media, 16(1), 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D., & Wiburg, K. (1994). Educational variables influencing technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., & Mitrani, M. (1993). The changing nature of teaching and learning in computer-based classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1), 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. OTA-HER-616. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Avilable: www.ota.nap.edu/pdf/data/1995/9541.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. Y. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghi, H. (1996). The role of the computer in the school as perceived by computer using teachers and school administrators. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(2), 137–155.
   Google Scholar