A comparative study of screening instruments and biomarkers for the detection of cannabis use

References

• Daldrup T, Kaferstein H, Kohler H, Maier RD, Musshoff F. Deciding between one off/occasional and regular cannabis consumption. Blutalkohol. 2000;37:39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Large MM, Smith G, Sara G, Paton MB, Kedzior KK, Nielssen OB. Meta-analysis of self-reported substance use compared with laboratory substance assay in general adult mental health settings. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21:134–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, van de Mheen H, van de Wiel A, Garretsen HF. Substance use among emergency room patients: is self-report preferable to biochemical markers? Addict Behav. 2006;31:1661–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fendrich M, Johnson TP, Wislar JS, Hubbell A, Spiehler V. The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey. Addiction. 2004;99:197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, Nowatzki N. Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan BJ, M LD, Tims FM, Diamond GS. Cannabis use: consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing. Addiction. 2002;97(Suppl 1):98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Robertson M. Comparisons of self-report data and oral fluid testing in detecting drug use amongst new treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;71:57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraete AG. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit. 2004;26:200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musshoff F, Driever F, Lachenmeier K, Lachenmeier DW, Banger M, Madea B. Results of hair analyses for drugs of abuse and comparison with self-reports and urine tests. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;156:118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert W, Mattern R. Beurteilungskriterien: Urteilsbildung in Der Medizinisch-Psychologischen Fahreignungsdiagnostik [German Driving Licence Re-Granting Guidelines]. Bonn, Germany: Kirschbaum Verlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Huestis MA, Gustafson RA, Moolchan ET, et al. Cannabinoid concentrations in hair from documented cannabis users. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca-Royo AM, Sanchez-Niubo A, Forero CG, Torrens M, Suelves JM, Domingo-Salvany A. Psychometric properties of the CAST and SDS scales in young adult cannabis users. Addict Behav. 2012;37:709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, et al. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction. 1995;90:607–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G, Copeland J, Gates P, Gilmour S. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: reliability, validity and diagnostic cut-off. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;83:90–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner S, Baumeister SE, Kraus L. Severity of Dependence Scale: establishing a cut-off point for cannabis dependence in the German adult population. Sucht. 2008;54:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pol P, Liebregts N, de Graaf R, Korf DJ, van den Brink W, van Laar M. Reliability and validity of the Severity of Dependence Scale for detecting cannabis dependence in frequent cannabis users. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013;22:138–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RL, Rounds LA. Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wis Med J. 1995;94:135–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couwenbergh C, Van Der Gaag RJ, Koeter M, De Ruiter C, Van den Brink W. Screening for substance abuse among adolescents validity of the CAGE-AID in youth mental health care. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:823–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mdege ND, Lang J. Screening instruments for detecting illicit drug use/abuse that could be useful in general hospital wards: a systematic review. Addict Behav. 2011;36:1111–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decorte T, Muys M, Slock S. Cannabis in Vlaanderen: patronen van cannabisgebruik bij ervaren gebruikers. Leuven, Belgium: Acco; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Raes E, Verstraete AG. Usefulness of roadside urine drug screening in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). J Anal Toxicol. 2005;29:632–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper GA, Kronstrand R, Kintz P. Society of Hair Testing guidelines for drug testing in hair. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;218:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78(3):691–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs D. Doing Quantitative Research in Education With SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240:1285–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer R. Computes confidence intervals for single proportions, for differences in proportions, for an odds-ratio and for the relative risk in a 2×2 table [computer program]. Version 0.2-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin CH, Castellon SA, Dickson-Fuhrman E, Daum G, Jaffe J, Jarvik L. Screening for drug and alcohol abuse among older adults using a modified version of the CAGE. Am J Addict. 2001;10:319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieczkowski T, Barzelay D, Gropper B, Wish E. Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: hair, urine, and self-report. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1991;23:241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar