Characteristics of women with alcohol use disorders who benefit from intensive motivational interviewing

References

• Erol A, Karpyak VM. Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield SF, Brooks AJ, Gordon SM, et al. Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86(1):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh RK, Wigderson S, Greenfield SF. Epidemiology of substance use in reproductive-age women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(2):177–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasoff LA, Milligan K, Le TL, Usher AM, Urbanoski K. Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting women with problematic substance use: service descriptions and client perceptions of care. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;90:9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walitzer KS, Dearing RL. Gender differences in alcohol and substance use relapse. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(2):128–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman E. Women and addiction: the importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. J Addict Dis. 2010;29(2):127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Pedersen ER, Osilla KC, Kulesza M, D'Amico EJ. Reviewing and interpreting the effects of brief alcohol interventions: comment on a Cochrane review about motivational interviewing for young adults. Addiction 2016;111(9):1521–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, et al. Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: a multisite effectiveness study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81(3):301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative A. The impact of screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment in emergency department patients’ alcohol use: a 3-, 6-and 12-month follow-up. Alcohol Alcohol 2010;45(6):514–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Nayak M. Development of intensive motivational interviewing (IMI) and modifications for treating women with alcohol use disorders. J Contemp Psychother. 2018;48(2):51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Pugh S, et al. Intensive motivational interviewing for heavy drinking among women. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2019;18(2):70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Nayak MB, Korcha R, et al. Heavy drinking among women receiving intensive motivational interviewing: 6-month outcomes. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2019;51:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway GP, Polcin D, Kielstein A, Brown M, Mendelson J. A nine session manual of motivational enhancement therapy for methamphetamine dependence: adherence and efficacy. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;39(sup4):393–400.
   Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Galloway GP, Palmer J, Mains W. The case for high-dose motivational enhancement therapy. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(2):331–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha R, Witbrodt J, Mericle AA, Mahoney E. Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) for persons on probation or parole entering sober living houses. Crim Justice Behav. 2018;45(11):1634–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obert JL, Farentinos C. Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome in Subject Seeking Treatment for Substance Abuse. Washington, DC: Clinical Trials Network, NIDA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Bond J, Korcha R, Nayak MB, Galloway GP, Evans K. Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence. J Addict Dis. 2014;33(3):253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korcha RA, Polcin DL, Evans K, Bond JC, Galloway GP. Intensive motivational interviewing for women with concurrent alcohol problems and methamphetamine dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(2):113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witbrodt J, Polcin D, Korcha R, Li L. Beneficial effects of motivational interviewing case management: a latent class analysis of recovery capital among sober living residents with criminal justice involvement. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;200:124–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung PA. Relational Psychotherapy: A Primer. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longabaugh R. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Volume 4 (NIH Pub. No. 95-3911). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health; 1995. Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6Wl5CLTWX. Accessed March 03, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nuro KF, Maccarelli L, Martino S, et al. Yale Adherence and Competence Scale (YACSII) Guidelines. West Haven, CT: Yale University Psychotherapy Development Center; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway GP, Marinelli-Casey P, Stalcup J, et al. Treatment-as-usual in the methamphetamine treatment project. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32(2):165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Forman RF, Svikis D, Montoya ID, Blaine J. Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Buchan G, Cleland PA, Fedoroff IC, Leo GI. The Reliability of the Timeline Followback Method Applied to Drug, Cigarette, and Cannabis Use. New York, NY: Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O’Brien CP. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;168(1):26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä K. Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addiction. 2004;99(4):398–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby FW, Edens JF. Construct validity and predictive utility of the stages of change scale for alcoholics. J. Subst Abuse. 1996;8(3):275–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLellan AT, McKay JR, Forman R, Cacciola JS, Kemp J. Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction. 2005;100(4):447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Frampton C. Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;36(1):75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritsher JB, McKellar JD, Finney JW, Otilingam PG, Moos RH. Psychiatric comorbidity, continuing care and mutual help as predictors of five-year remission from substance use disorders. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(6):709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Korcha RA, Kerr WC, Greenfield TK, Bond J. Gender and social pressure to change drinking behavior: results from the National Alcohol Surveys from 1984-2010. Addict Res Theory. 2014;22(6):481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar