Improved randomized response in additive scrambling models

References

• Bar-Lev, S. K., Bobovitch, E., and Boukai, B. (2004). A note on randomized response models for quantitative data. Metrika, 60(3): 255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A., Christofides, T. C., and Saha, A. (2009). Protection of privacy in efficient application of randomized response techniques. Statistical Methods and Applications, 18(3): 389–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dihidar, K. and Chowdhury, J. (2013). Enhancing a randomized response model to estimate population means to sensitive questions. Mathematical Population Studies, 20(3): 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, B. H. and Hayre, L. S. (1983). Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 7(4): 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. G., Kuebler, R. R., Abernathy, J. R., et al. (1971). Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(334): 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. and Thornton, B. (2002). Circumventing social desirability response bias in personal interview surveys. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 22(3): 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. N., Thornton, B., Shabbir, J., et al. (2006). A comparison of multiplicative and additive optional RRT models. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 5(3): 226–239.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Gupta, B., and Singh, S. (2002). Estimation of sensitivity level of personal interview survey questions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 100(2): 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Shabbir, J., and Sehra, S. (2010). Mean and sensitivity estimation in optional randomized response models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(10): 2870–2874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Shabbir, J., Sousa, R., et al. (2012). Estimation of the mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of auxiliary information. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 41(13–14): 2394–2404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta. S. and Shabbir. J. (2004). Sensitivity estimation for personal interview survey Questions. Statistica anno, LXIV(4): 643–653.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K. C. (2008). Estimation for the sensitive characteristic using optional randomized response technique. Quality and Quantity, 42(5): 679–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K. C. (2010). Unbiased estimators of mean, variance and sensitivity level for quantitative characteristics in finite population sampling. Metrika, 71(3): 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z. (2012). On eliminating the scrambling variance in scrambled response models. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6): 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z. and Al-Zahrani, B. (2016). Mean and sensitivity estimation of a sensitive variable through additive scrambling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 45(1): 182–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z. and Shabbir, J. (2007). Estimation of mean of a sensitive quantitative variable. Journal of Statistical Research, 41(2): 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, A. Y. C. (1990). Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika, 77(2): 436–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, J. B., Kim, J. M., Heo, T. Y., et al. (2005–2006). On stratified randomized response sampling. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 1(1): 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309): 63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaizai, Y., Jingyu, W., and Junfeng, L. (2009). An efficiency and protection degree-based comparison among the quantitative randomized response strategies. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38(3): 400–408.
   Google Scholar