Scientific self-fashioning after Frankenstein: the afterlives of Shelley’s novel in Victorian sciences and medicine

References

• Augoustinos, M., S. Crabb, and R. Shepherd. 2010. “Genetically Modified Food in the News: Media Representations of the GM Debate in the UK.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (1): 98–114. doi:10.1177/0963662508088669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “The Banks of the Thames.” 1858. Lancet 71 (1795) (January 23): 94.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, J. 1828. “Lectures on the Gravid Uterus, and on the Diseases of Women and Children.” Lancet 11 (273) (November 22): 225–231. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)91801-5
   Google Scholar
• “The Bridge-Street Explosion.” 1866. Freeman’s Journal 17 (1196) (March 10): 152.
   Google Scholar
• Bucknill, J. C. 1878. “Lumleian Lectures on Insanity in its Legal Relations.” Lancet 111 (2851) (April 20): 558–561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)63984-3
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2018. “How a Horror Story Haunts Science.” Science 359 (6372) (January 12): 148–150. doi: 10.1126/science.359.6372.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Critical and Explanatory Notes on the New Pharmacopoeia.” 1864. Lancet 83 (2121) (April 23): 479-481.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. 2004. “Can Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein be Read as an Early Medical Ethics Text?” Medical Humanities 30 (1): 32–35. doi:10.1136/jmh.2003.000153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dibbs, G. 1891. “From April 2 Debate on the Commonwealth of Australia Bill at the 1891 National Convention in Sydney.” In Official Record of the Proceedings and Debates of the National Australasian Convention, Held in the Parliament House, Sydney, New South Wales, in the Months of March and April 1891. Trove (National Library of Australia database; Accessed December 11, 2018). https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/8285187.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 1878. On Some Relations of Chemistry to Medicine: Address to the Medical Students. Glasgow: James Maclehose.
   Google Scholar
• Forry, S. E. 1990. Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein From the Nineteenth Century to the Present. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. D., and A. B. Kavey. 2016. Monstrous Progeny: A History of the Frankenstein Narratives. New York: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, G. M., and W. L. Pyle. 1897. Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. 2004. “Monsters of Modernity: Frankenstein and Modern Environmentalism.” Cultural Geographies 11 (2): 181–198. doi: 10.1191/14744744004eu301oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. D. 2016. “Whatever Happened to the ‘Mad, Bad’ Scientist? Overturning the Stereotype.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1177/0963662514535689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, S. T. 2007. Frankenstein: A Cultural History. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• “Increase in Number of Medical Men.” 1899. Telegraph (Brisbane) (8300) (June 26): 4.
   Google Scholar
• “The Medical School, University of Sydney.” 1899. Australasian Medical Gazette 18 (April 20): 169–170.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. 1996. “Frankenstein and the Debate Over Embryo Research.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 (2): 157–176. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/016224399602100202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., R. Wyle, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. 2018. “Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4): 1143–1159. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9936-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Notes” 1883. Nature 29 (737) (December 13): 158–159.
   Google Scholar
• “Notes” 1894. Nature 50 (1279) (May 3): 14.
   Google Scholar
• “Overcrowding the Medical Profession.” 1899. Toowoomba Chronicle and Darling Downs General Advertiser (5828) (May 13): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Stone Group. 2018. “History of Stone Disease.” Accessed December 10 2018. https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/osg/history-of-stone-disease.
   Google Scholar
• Ransome, A. 1869. The Thruston Speech Upon the Progress of Medicine. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, D. 2006. “A Troubled Legacy: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and the Inheritance of Human Rights.” Representations 96 (1): 48–72. doi:10.1525/rep.2006.96.1.48.
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, B. E. 1995. The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S. 1999. “Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture.” Review of Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture, by Jon Turney.” New England Journal of Medicine 340 (3): 243–244. doi:10.1056/NEJM199901213400322.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. 1994. Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus: The 1818 Text, Edited by Marilyn Butler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. 2012. Frankenstein, edited by J. Paul Hunter. 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., ed. 2016. The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubber, C., and M. Kirkman. 2016. “The Persistence of the Frankenstein Myth: Organ Transplantation and Surrogate Motherhood.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 99 (1): 29–53. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/609296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Tonsils.” 1893. Dominion Medical Monthly 13 (January): 124.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, J. 1998. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyndall, J. 1871. “Miracles and Special Providences.” In Fragments of Science for Unscientific People: A Series of Detached Essays, Lectures, and Reviews, vol. 2 39–68. London: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• “Untitled.” 1856. Lancet 68 (1731) (November 1): 497–498.
   Google Scholar
• van den Belt, H. 2018. “Frankenstein Lives On.” Science 359 (6372) (January 12): 137. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakley, T. 1829. “Attorney General Pills.” Lancet 13 (328) (December 12): 377–381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)82643-5
   Google Scholar
• Wakley, J. 1864. “The Hospital for Stone.” Lancet 84 (2133) (July 16): 74–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)68291-1
   Google Scholar
• Wakley, J. 1874. “The Discussion on Cholera.” Lancet 103 (2640) (April 4): 482–483. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)45524-9
   Google Scholar
• Young, E. 2008. Black Frankenstein: The Making of an American Metaphor. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar