Archiving Dracula: knowledge acquisition and interdisciplinarity

References

• Agassiz, Louis. 1859. An Essay on Classification. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts. archive.org/details/essayonclassific00agas/mode/2up.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Amanda, and Joseph Valente. 2002. “Introduction: Discipline and Freedom.” In Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle, edited by Amanda Anderson and Joseph Valente, 1–15. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arata, Stephen D. 1990. “The Occidental Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonization.” Victorian Studies 33 (4): 621–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayly, C. A. 1996. Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• “The Books that made Dracula.” The London Library, www.londonlibrary.co.uk/dracula.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Matthew C. 1992. “Repression, Knowledge, and Saving Souls: The Role of the ‘New Woman’ in Stoker’s Dracula and Murnau’s Nosferatu.” Studies in the Humanities 19 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Case, Alison. 1993. “Tasting the Original Apple: Gender and the Struggle for Narrative Authority in ‘Dracula’.” Narrative 1 (3): 223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Comte, Auguste. 1853. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Translated by Harriet Martineau. London: John Chapman. archive.org/details/positivephiloso03martgoog/mode/2up.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, Christopher. 1984. “‘Kiss Me with those Red Lips’: Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.” Representations 8: 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Daunton, Martin. 2005. “Introduction.” In The Organisation of Knowledge in Victorian Britain, edited by Martin Daunton, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Translated by Eric Prenowitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, Molly. 2013. “The Language of Flowers in the Victorian Knowledge Age.” Victoriographies 3 (2): 136–160.
   Google Scholar
• Fleissner, Jennifer L. 2000. “Dictation Anxiety: The Stenographer’s Stake in Dracula.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 22 (3): 417–455.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2010. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Vintage-Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gephardt, Katarina. 2016. The Idea of Europe in British Travel Narratives, 1789–1914. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Lisa. 2007. Bram Stoker: A Literary Life. London: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, Rosemary. 1989. “Saved by Science? The Mixed Messages of Stoker’s ‘Dracula’.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 31 (2): 273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittler, Friedrich. 1989. “Dracula’s Legacy.” Translated by William Stephen Davis. Stanford Humanities 1 (1): 143–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kittler, Friedrich. 1990. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Translated by Michael Metteer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, Philippa. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians, and Archæologists in Victorian England 1838–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, John. 1859. The Vegetable Kingdom: Or, The Structure, Classification, and Uses of Plants Illustrated upon the Natural System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. archive.org/details/vegetablekingdom00linduoft.
   Google Scholar
• Luckhurst, Roger. 2011. “Introduction.” In Dracula, edited by Roger Luckhurst, vii–xxxii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Östling, Johan. 2018. Humboldt and the Modern German University: An Intellectual History. Translated by Lena Olsson. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pikula, Tanya. 2012. “Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Late Victorian Advertising Tactics: Earnest Men, Virtuous Ladies, and Porn.” English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 55 (3): 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, Rebecca A. 1990. “Writing and Biting in Dracula.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 1 (3): 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, Charles E., and Grace A. Giorgio. 2005. “Vampiric Affinities: Mina Harker and the Paradox of Femininity in Bram Stoker’s ‘Dracula’.” Victorian Literature and Culture 33 (2): 487–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, Alan. 2001. Useful Knowledge: The Victorians, Morality, and the March of Intellect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Thomas. 1993. The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Leah. 2009. “Mass Production and the Spread of Information in Dracula: ‘Proofs of so Wild a Story’.” English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 52 (4): 440–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secord, James A. 1994. “Introduction.” In Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Other Evolutionary Writings, edited by Robert Chambers, vii–xlviii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, David. 1985. “The Narrative Method of Dracula.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40 (1): 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, Elaine. 1990. Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at the Fin de Siècle. New York: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Herbert. 1864. The Principles of Biology. London: Williams and Norgate. archive.org/details/principlesbiolo05spengoog/mode/2up.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Herbert. 1891. Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. Vol. 2 of Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative. London: Williams and Norgate. archive.org/details/hspenceressayssc02spen.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, Anne. 2006. “Cerebral Automatism, the Brain, and the Soul in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 15: 131–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, Bram. 1997. Dracula. Edited by Nina Auerbach and David J. Skal. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wicke, Jennifer. 1992. “Vampiric Typewriting: Dracula and Its Media.” ELH 59 (2): 467–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar