GM food nightmare unfolding in the regulatory sham

References

• Ho MW. GM soya fed rats: stunted, dead or sterile. Science in Society 2007; 33 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Safety and Nutritional Assessment of GM Plant derived Foods/Feed. The role of animal feeding trials. Draft report for public consultation. European Food Safety Authority, December, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV. Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary studies. EcosInform 2006;1:4–9 ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV. Mine-field of genetics. State Management of Resources 2006;2:44–52 ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV, Barskov IV. Influence of diet with the soy modified by the gene CP4 EPSPS on physiological state of rats and their offspring. Agrarian Russia 2006 ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova I.V. Genetically modified organisms and biological risks. Proceedings of International Disaster Reduction Conference, Davos, Switzerland, August 27–September 1, 2006: 168–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV. Influence of genetically modified soya on the birth-weight and survival of rat pups. Proceedings Epigenetics, Transgenic Plants and Risk Assessment, 2006:41–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV. The effect of GM-soya on rats and their posterity. The first International Forum on Patient Safety. 23–24 January, 2006, p.30.
   Google Scholar
• Ermakova IV. Diet with the food, modified by gene EPSPS CP4, leads to the anxiety and aggression in rats. 14th European Congress of Psychiatry. Nice, France, 4–8 March, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. More illnesses linked to Bt crops. Science in Society 2006; 30: 8–10
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Mass deaths in sheep grazing on Bt cotton. Science in Society 2006; 30: 12–13
   Google Scholar
• Prescott VE, Campbell PM, Moore A, Mattes J, Rothenberg ME, Foster PS, et al. Transgenic expression of bean a-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53: 9023–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Transgenic pea that made mice ill. Science in Society 2006; 29: 28–9
   Google Scholar
• Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Rossi L, Battistelli S, Rocchi MBL, Tonucci F, et al. Ultrastructural analysis of pancreatic acinar cells from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. J Anat 2002; 201: 409–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatesta M, Biggiogera M, Manuali E, Rochhi MBL, Baldelli B, Gazzanelli G. Fine structural analyses of pancreatic acinar cell nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Eur J Histochem 2003; 47: 385–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Gavaudan S, Rocchi MBL, Serafini S, Tiberi C, et al. Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analysis of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Cell Struct Funct 2002; 27: 175–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatesta M, Tiberi C, Baldelli B, Battistelli S, Manuali E, Biggiogera M. Reversibility of hepatocyte nuclear modifications in mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Eur J Histochem 2005; 49: 237–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio L, Cisterna B, Malatesta M, Martin TE, Biggiogera M. Ultrastructural analysis of testes from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Eur J Histochem 2004; 48: 449–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. GM ban long overdue. Dozens ill & five deaths in the Philippines. Science in Society 2006; 29: 26–7
   Google Scholar
• French experts very disturbed by health effects of Monsanto GM corn. GMWatch, 23 April, 2004. www.gmwatch.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Burcher S. Cows ate GM maize and died. Science in Society 2004; 21: 4–6
   Google Scholar
• Pusztai A, Bardocz S, Ewen SWB. Genetically modified foods: potential human health effects. Food safety: contaminants and toxins, JPF D'Mello. CAB International, Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fares NH, El-Sayed AK. Fine structural changes in the ileum of mice fed on delta endotoxin-treated potatotes and transgenic potatoes. Nat Toxins 1998; 6: 219–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novotny E. Animals avoid GM food, for good reasons. Science in Society 2004; 21: 9–11
   Google Scholar
• Agbios. http://www.agbios.com/main.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW (1999) . Genetic engineering dream or nightmare?, 2nd edn. Bath: Gateway Books, Third World Network, 1998; Dublin: Gill and McMillan, Continuum, ; reprint with extended introduction, Third World Network, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. FAQs on genetic engineering. ISIS tutorial. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/onlinestore/papers2.php#section5.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Horizontal gene transfer, the hidden hazards of genetic engineering. ISIS Report 2001. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/horizontal.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Special safety concerns of transgenic agriculture and related issues. ISIS Briefing for the Minister for the Environment, Rt Hon. Michael Meacher, April, 1999. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/meacher99.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Traavik T, Olsvik R, Tappeser B, Howard V, von Weizsacker C, et al. Gene technology and gene ecology of infectious diseases. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1998; 10: 33–59
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Ryan A, Cummins J. Cauliflower mosaic viral promoter – a recipe for Disaster?. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1999; 11: 194–7
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Ryan A, Cummins J. Hazards of transgenic plants with the cauliflower mosaic viral promoter. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2000; 12: 6–11
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Ryan A, Cummins J. CaMV35S promoter fragmentation hotspot confirmed and it is active in animals. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2000; 12: 189
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Horizontal gene transfer, book review. Heredity 2003; 90: 6–7
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW (2004) , Lim LC. The case for a GM-free fustainable world. Independent Science Panel Report. London: Institute of Science in Society and Third World Network, 2003; republished GM-free, exposing the hazards of biotechnology to ensure the integrity of our food supply. Ridgefield, CT: Vitalhealth Publishing, .
   Google Scholar
• Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 607–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. US foodborne illnesses up two to ten fold. ISIS Report 3 November, 2001. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/FoodborneIllnesses.php; also Science in Society 2002;13/14:23.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. Bacterial genes and autoimmune responses. ISIS News 2000;5: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews5.php#bact.
   Google Scholar
• Heeg K, Zimmerann S. DpG DNA as a Th1 Trigger. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000; 121: 87–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Gene therapy and naked DNA vaccines can trigger autoimmune reactions. ISIS News 1999;2: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews5.php#bact.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Mori A, Ishii KJ, Singer DS, Dlinman DM, Drause PR, et al. Activation of target-tissue immune-recognition molecules by double-stranded polynucloetides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 2285–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genetically modified animal feed. Briefing, Friends of the Earth, May, 2006. http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/gm_animal_feeds.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Biofuels for oil addicts. Science in Society 2006; 30: 29–30
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Biodiesel boom for Europe?. Science in Society 2006; 30: 31–2
   Google Scholar
• Joensen L, Ho MW. Argentina's GM woes. Science in Society 2003; 20: 14–15
   Google Scholar
• West African food aid contaminated with GM rice. Friends of the Earth Press Release, 24 November, 2006. http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/west_african_food_aid_cont_24112006.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Steinbrecher RA. Fatal flaws in food safety assessment: critique of the joint FAO/WHO Biotechnology and Food Safety Report. Environmental & Nutritional Interactions 1998; 2: 51–84
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein IL, Bernstein JA, Miller M, Tierzieva S, Bernstein DI, Lummus Z, et al. Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides. Environmental Health Perspectives 1999;107(7): http://www.ehponline.org/members/1999/107p575-582bernstein/bernstein-full.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Padrón RI, Moreno-Fierros L, Neri-Bazán L, de la Riva G, López-Revilla R. Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induce systemic and mucosal antibody responses in mice. Life Sci 1999; 64: 1897–912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Padrón RI, Morreno-Fierros L, Neri-Bezán L, de la Riva GA, López-Revilla R. CrylAc protoxin from Bacillus thringiensis sp. kurstaki HD73 binds to surface proteins in the mouse small intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 271: 54–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton A, Klein H, Romeis J, Bigler F. Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperia carnea. Ecological Entomology 2002; 27: 441–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeis J, Dutton A, Bigler F. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 2004; 50: 175–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleter GA, Peijnenburg Ad ACM. Screening of transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino acid sequences identical to potential, IgE-binding linear epitopes of allergens. BMC Structural Biology 2002;2:8. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6807/2/8.
   Google Scholar
• Fiers MWEJ, Kleter GA, Nijland H, Peijnenburg Ad ACM, Nap JP, van Ham RCHJ. AllermatchTM, a webtool for the prediction of potential allergenicity according to current FAO/WHO Codex alimentarius guidelines. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:133. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/5/133.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Pusztai A, Bardocz S, Cummins J. Are transgenic proteins allergenic?. Science in Society 2005; 25: 4–5
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury EH, Kuribara H, Hino A, Sultana P, Mikami O, Shimada N, et al. Detection of corn intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and CrylAb protein in the gastrointestinal contents of pigs fed genetically modified corn Bt11. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 2546–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Transgenic DNA & Bt toxin survive digestion. Science in Society 2004; 21: 11
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Are current transgenic technologies safe? Capacity building in biosafety urgently needed for developed countries. In: Biosafety Capacity Building: Evaluation Criteria Workshop Proceedings. Stockholm Environment Institute, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Tappeser B. Transgenic transgression of species integrity and species boundaries. In: Mulongoy K. Proceedings of the Workshop on Transboundary Movement of Living Modified Organisms Resulting from Modern Biotechnology: Issues and Opportunities for Policy-makers. Aarhus, DenmarkSwiss Academy of the Environment, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Myhre MR, Fenton KA, Eggert K, Nielsen KM, Traavik T. The 35S CaMV plant virus promoter is active in human enterocyte-like cells. Eur Food Res Technol 2005; DOI 10.1007/y00217.005.0154.3.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard F, Smalla K. Monitoring field releases of genetically modified sugar beets for persistence of transgenic plant DNA and horizontal gene transfer. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1999; 28: 261–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Horizontal gene transfer happens. A practical exercise in applying the precautionary principle. ISIS News 2000;5. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews5.php#hori.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Horizontal gene transfer happens II. ISIS Report, 4 May, 2001. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/hgthappens.php.
   Google Scholar
• Duggans PS, Chambers PA, Heritage J, Forbes JM. Survival of free DNA encoding antibiotic resistance from transgenic maize and the transformation activity of DNA in ovine saliva, ovine rumen fluid and silage effluent. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000; 91: 71–7
   Google Scholar
• DeVries J, Meier P, Wackernagel W. The natural transformation of the soil bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Acinetobacter sp. By transgenic plant DNA strictly depends on homologous sequences in the recipient cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001; 192: 211–15
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. Molecular pharming by chloroplast transformation. Science in Society 2005; 27: 4–5
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. GM pharmaceuticals from common green alga. Science in Society 2005; 27: 6–7
   Google Scholar
• de Vries J, Meier P, Wackernagel W. The natural transformation of the soil bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Acinetobacter sp. by transgenic plant DNA strictly depends on homologous sequences in the recipient cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001; 195: 211–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries J, Herzfeld T, Wackernagel W. Transfer of plastid DNA from tobacco to the soil bacterium Acinetobacter sp. by natural transformation. Mol Microbiol 2004; 53: 323–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries J, Meier P, Wackernagel W. Microbial horizontal gene transfer and the DNA release from transgenic crop plants. Plant and Soil 2004; 266: 91–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. DNA in GM food & feed. Science in Society 2004; 23: 34–6
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury EH, Mikami O, Nakajima Y, Hino A, Kuribara H, Suga K, et al. Detection of genetically modified maize DNA fragments in the gastrointestinal contents of pigs fed StarLink CBH351. Vet Hum Toxicol 2003; 45: 95–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter T, Aulrich K. Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition: fate of feed-ingested foreign DNA in pig bodies. Eur Food Res Technol 2003; 216: 185–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan PS, Chambers PA, Heritage J, Forbes JM. Fate of genetically modified maize DNA in the oral cavity and rumen of sheep. Br J Nutr 2003; 89: 159–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Maddison BC. Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood and feces of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 4070–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherwood T, Martin-Orue SM, O-Donnell AG, Gockling S, Graham J, Mathers JC, et al. Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nature Biotechnology 2004; 22: 204–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espanier R, Klotz A, Draft J, Aulrich K, Pser R, Schwagele F, et al. The fate for forage plant DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material. Eur Food Res Technol 2001; 212: 129–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubbert R, Rentz D, Schmitz B, Döerfler W. Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94: 961–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döerfler W, Schubbert R. Uptake of foreign DNA from the environment: the gastrointestinal tract and the placenta as portals of entry. Wien Dlin Wochenstr 1998; 119: 40–4
   Google Scholar
• Hohlweg U, Döerfler W. On the fate of plant or other foreign genes upon the uptake in food or after intramuscular injection in mice. Mol Genet Genomics 2001; 265: 225–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Circulating DNA converts genomes? Latest exposé on the fluid genome. Science in Society 2002; 15: 18
   Google Scholar
• Samos J, Garcia-Olmo DC, Picazo MG, Rubio-Vitaller A, Garcia-Olmo D. Circulating nucleic acids in plasma/serum and tumor progression. Are apoptotic bodies involved an experimental study in a rat cancer model. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1075: 165–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahan PB. Circulating DNA. Intracellular and intraorgan messenger?. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1075: 21–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J (2007) . Universal condemnation meets UK government's green light for GM potato trials. Submission to UK Food Standards Agency, December, 2006, also Science in Society ;33 ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Schluter K, Futterer J, Potrykus I. Horizontal gene-transfer from a transgenic potato line to a bacterial pathogen (Erwinia-chrysanthem) occurs, if at all, at an extremely low-frequency. Bio/Techology 1995; 13: 1094–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burcher S. Global GM crops area exaggerated. Science in Society 2007;33 ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. Roundup ready sudden death, superweeds, allergens … Time to wipe GM crops off the globe. Science in Society 2005; 28: 26–7
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Scientists confirm failures of Bt crops. Science in Society 2005; 28: 22–4
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. GM crops and microbes for health or public health hazards? ISIS submission to Codex Alimentarius, 2006. also Science in Society 2006; 32: 30–3
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. Genetically modified probiotics should be banned. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2005; 17: 66–8
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. Reply to GM microbes for human health. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2006; 18: 77–8
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. GM food animals coming ISIS submission to Codex Alimenarius, 2006. also Science in Society 2006; 32: 24–9
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. Is FDA promoting or regulating cloned meat and milk?. Science in Society 2007; 33: 24–7
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. Cloned BSE-free cows, not safe nor proper science. Science in Society 2007; 33: 28–31
   Google Scholar
• Wells DN. Animal cloning: problems and prospects. Rev Sci Tech 2005; 24: 251–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Montreal, 29 January, 2000). http://www.biodiv.org/biosafety/signinglist.aspx?sts=rtf&ord=dt.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of generically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/l_106/l_10620010417en00010038.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM (2000) 1 final. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2000/com2000_0001en01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ACNFP Members’ interests June, 2006. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/acnfpintjun06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Food Standards Agency's Approach to Risk, Food Standards Agency, 2001. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/riskapproach.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders PT. Use and abuse of the precautionary principle. ISIS submission to US Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy Biotech. Working Group 13 July, 2000. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/prec.php.
   Google Scholar
• John B. Response from GM Free Cymru to the EFSA consultation on GMO feeding trials, 29 January, 2007. http://www.gmfreecymru.org/news/Press_Notice21February2006.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Approval of Bt11 maize endangers humans and livestock. Science in Society 2004; 23L: 26–7
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW, Lim LC. No to GM oilseed rape GT73. Science in Society 2004; 24: 18–19
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. European Commission accuses its own food safety authority of GMO bias – wide ranging changes introduced. Science in Society 2006; 30: 16
   Google Scholar
• Brake DG, Evenson DP. A generational study of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans on mouse fetal, postnatal, pubertal and adult testicular development. Food Chem Toxicol 2004; 42: 29–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John B. Email from Dr Brian John (GM Free Cymru) to Professor Mike Gasson (ACNFP Chairman) 21 January 2006 in Committee Paper for Discussion. Effect of GM Soya on Newborn Rats. ACNFP/75/11. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/acnfp_75_11_gmsoya.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wraight CL, Zangeri AR, Carroll MH, Berenbaum MR. Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 97: 7700–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Swallowing the tale of the swallowtail. ISIS News 2000;5. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews5.php#swal.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Exposed: more shoddy science in GM maize approval. Science in Society 2004; 22: 16–17
   Google Scholar
• Traces of genetic engineering detected in milk. Greenpeace, 22 June, 2004. http://weblog.greenpeace.org/ge/archives/001471.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Cover-up over DNA in milk. Science in Society 2005; 27: 8–9
   Google Scholar
• Seralini G-E, Spiroux de Vendomois J, Cellier D. Criticisms and improvements of strategies for the safety assessment of GM plant derived foods or feed. An answer to EFSA Draft Report on Animal Feeding Trials with GMOs. January, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Heller L. Monsanto seeks approval for new GM soybean. Food Navigator, 14 February, 2007. www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=74178&m=1FNU214&c=kkdjilldcjhbfqc.
   Google Scholar
• Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Seralini GE. Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113: 716–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. Glyphosate toxic & Roundup worse. Science in Society 2005; 26: 12
   Google Scholar
• Relyea RA. The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities. Ecological Applications 2005; 15: 618–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preliminary report by Criigen on the ‘First public investigation of the crude data in Mon 863 toxicity tests on rats’ 2005. http://www.greenpeace.de/fileadmin/gpd/user_upload/themen/gentechnik/MON_863_French_report_statistics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GM food, Food Standards Agency. http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/healthissues/factsbehindissues/gmfood/.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Ho MW. USDA poised to deregulate illegal GM rice. Science in Society 2006; 32: 6–7
   Google Scholar
• Saunders PT. GM rice contamination: how regulators tried to sidestep the law. Science in Society 2006; 32: 4–5
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW, Cummins J. GM food and feed not fit for “man or beast”. ISIS Report, ISP Briefing to UK Parliament, 7 May, 2004. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ManorBeast.php.
   Google Scholar
• Collonier C, Berthier G, Boyer F, Duplan M-N, Fernandez S, Kebdani N, et al. Characterization of commercial GMO inserts: a source of useful material to study genome fluidity. Poster courtesy of Pr Gilles-Eric Seralini, Président du Conseil Scientifique du CRII-GEN. www.crii-gen.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Transgenic lines proven unstable. Science in Society 2003; 20: 35
   Google Scholar
• Ho MW. Unstable transgenic lines illegal. Science in Society 2004; 21: 23
   Google Scholar
• Court rules federal government acted illegally in permitting field trials of genetically engineered crops in Hawaii. Press Release Center for Food Safety, 14 August, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Federal court orders for the first time a halt to new field trials of genetically engineered crops. Press Release, 6 February, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Federal court finds USDA erred in approving genetically engineered alfalfa without full environmental review. Press Release, Center for Food Safety, 8 February, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gee D. Perceptions of the precautionary principle and the political consequences. Introducing the subject. Presentation at Franco-British Council conference: Policy making and risk management. French and British viewpoints. 8 February, Paris, France, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Harremos P, Gee D, McGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental Issue Report No. 22. European Environmental Agency. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Meacher M. Which science or scientists can you trust?. Science in Society 2005; 26: 4–5
   Google Scholar