A new elusive otodontid shark (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) from the lower Miocene, and comments on the taxonomy of otodontid genera, including the ‘megatoothed’ clade

References

• Adnet S, Cappetta H, Elnahas S, Strougo A. 2011. A new Priabonian chondrichthyans assemblage from the western desert, Egypt. Correlation with the Fayum oasis. J Af Earth Sci. 61:27–37.10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnet S, Cappetta H, Tabuce R. 2010. A Middle-Late Eocene vertebrate fauna (marine fish and mammals) from southwestern Morocco; preliminary report: age and palaeobiogeographical implications. Geol Mag. 147:860–870.10.1017/S0016756810000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrianavalona TH, Ramihangihajason TN, Rasoamiaramanana A, Ward DJ, Ali JR, Samonds KE. 2015. Miocene shark and batoid fauna from Nosy Makamby (Mahajanga Basin, northwestern Madagascar). PLoS One. 10:e0129444.10.1371/journal.pone.0129444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate SP, Espinosa-Arrubarrena L. 1996. The fossil history of Carcharodon and its possible ancestor, Cretolamna: a study in tooth identification. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 19–36.10.1016/B978-012415031-7/50005-7
   Google Scholar
• Becker MA, Smith LC, Chamberlain JA Jr. 2011. Chondrichthyans of the Clayton Limestone unit of the Midway Group (Paleogene: Paleocene) of Hot Spring County Arkansas, USA. Cainoz Res. 8:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Berg LS. 1958. System der Rezenten und Fossilen Fischartigen und Fische [System of recent and fossil fish-like forms and fishes]. Berlin: Hochschulbücher für Biologie; 310 p.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren WA. 1972. A Cenozoic time scale – some implications for regional geology and paleobiogeography. Lethaia. 5:195–215.10.1111/let.1972.5.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaparte CL. 1838. Selachorum tabula analytica. Nuovi Annali della Scienze Naturali. Bologna. 1:195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Brummitt RK. 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon. 46:723–734.10.2307/1224478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappetta H. 1980. Les sélaciens du Crétacé supérieur du Liban. I: Requins. Palaeont Abt A. 168:69–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cappetta H. 2012. Chondrichthyes. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii: Teeth. In: Schultze H-P, editor. Handbook of paleoichthyology, volume 3E. Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 512 p.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Briceño JD, De Gracia C, Pimiento C, Aguilera OA, Kindlimann R, Santamarina P, Jaramillo C. 2015. A new late Miocene chondrichthyan assemblage from the Chagres Formation, Panama. J So Am Earth Sci. 60:56–70.10.1016/j.jsames.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case GR. 1981. Late Eocene selachians from south-central Georgia. Palaeontogr Abt A. 176:52–79, 9 plates.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler R, editor. 2015. The fossils of North Carolina, volume III, fish. Raleigh: North Carolina Fossil Club; 376 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez S, Zufan S, Kim SH, Shimada K. 2012. Tooth sizes as a proxy for estimating body lengths in porbeagle Shark, Lamna nasus. J Fossil Res. 45:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Compagno LJV. 1977. Phyletic relationships of living sharks and rays. Am Zool. 17:303–322.10.1093/icb/17.2.303
   Google Scholar
• Compagno LJV. 2002. Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2: Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. 1:1–269.
   Google Scholar
• Corral J-C, Berreteaga A, Cappetta H. 2016. Upper Maastrichtian shallow marine environments and neoselachian assemblages in North Iberian palaeomargin (Castilian Ramp, Spain). Cret Res. 57:639–661.10.1016/j.cretres.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison RE, Hetherington EA, Bishop BA, Dahl DA, Koepnick RB. 1993. The use of strontium isotopes in stratigraphic studies: an example from North Carolina. Southeastern Geol. 33:53–69.
   Google Scholar
• DeVries TJ. 1988. Chilcatay sections of the Caballas Formation, Pisco Basin guidebook. In: Dunbar BR, Baker PA, editors. Cenozoic geology of the Pisco Basin. Lima, Peru: Guidebook to Regional IGCP 156 Field Workshop; May 16–25; p. 186–195.
   Google Scholar
• DeVries TJ. 1998. Oligocene deposition and Cenozoic sequence boundaries in the Pisco Basin (Peru). J So Am Earth Sci. 11:217–231.10.1016/S0895-9811(98)00014-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar RB, Marty RC, Baker PA. 1990. Cenozoic marine sedimentation in the Sechura and Pisco basins, Peru. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol. 77:235–261.10.1016/0031-0182(90)90179-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret DJ, Ebersole J. 2014. Occurrence of the megatoothed sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA. PeerJ. 2:e625.10.7717/peerj.625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret DJ, Macfadden BJ, Jones DS, Devries TJ, Foster DA, Salas-Gismondi R. 2012. Origin of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes: Lamnidae) based on recalibration of the Upper Neogene Pisco Formation of Peru. Palaeontology. 55:1139–1153.10.1111/pala.2012.55.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson TG. 1967. Stratigraphy and paleoenvironment of the phosphatic Miocene strata of North Carolina. Geol Soc Am Bull. 78:631–650, 4 figures, 2 plates.10.1130/0016-7606(1967)78[631:SAPOTP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glikman LS. 1964. [Sharks of Paleogene and Their Stratigraphic Significance]. Moscow: Nauka Pressl; 229 p. ( in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried MD, Compagno LJV, Bowman SC. 1996. Size and skeletal anatomy of the giant “megatooth” shark Carcharodon megalodon. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 55–66.10.1016/B978-012415031-7/50008-2
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa Y, Uyeno T. 1967. [Fossil fishes]. In: Anancho no kaseki [Fossils of Anan City]. Anan, Nagano Prefecture, Japan: Anancho [Anan City] Educational Committee; p. 113–117, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hay OP. 1902. Bibliography and catalogue of the fossil vertebrata of North America. Bull US Geol Surv. 179:868 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 280 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell G. 1996. Using tooth structure to determine the evolutionary history of the white shark. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG, editors. Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 9–18.10.1016/B978-012415031-7/50004-5
   Google Scholar
• Huxley TH. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 43:649–661.
   Google Scholar
• Iserbyt A, De Schutter PJ. 2012. Quantitative analysis of elasmobranch assemblages from two successive Ypresian (early Eocene) facies at Marke, western Belgium. Geol Belg. 15:146–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito Y. 1982. On the microfossils of the Miocene Ichishi Group, southwest Japan. News Osaka Micropaleontol. 9:1–10 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Itoigawa J, Shibata H. 1992. Miocene paleogeography of the Setouchi Geologic Province, Japan. Mizunzmi Fossil Mus Bull. 19:1–12 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kriwet J, Engelbrecht A, Mörs T, Reguero M, Pfaff C. 2016. Ultimate Eocene (Priabonian) chondrichthyans (Holocephali, Elasmobranchii) of Antarctica. J Vert Paleontol. doi:10.1080/02724634.2016.1160911.
   Google Scholar
• Laurito CA, Calvo C, Valerio AL, Calvo A, Chacón R. 2014. Ictiofauna del Mioceno Inferior de la localidad de Pacuare de Tres Equis, Formación Río Banano, provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica, y descripción de un nuevo género y una nueva especie de Scaridae. Revista Geol Am Central. 50:153–192.
   Google Scholar
• Macharé J, Fourtanier E. 1987. Datation des formations tertiaires du bassin de Pisco (Pérou) à partir d’associations de diatomées. CR Acad Sci Paris. 305:407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Maisey JG, Naylor GJP, Ward DJ. 2004. Mesozoic elasmobranchs, neoselachian phylogeny, and the rise of modern neoselachian diversity. In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic fishes III systematics, paleoenvironments and biodiversity. Munich: Verlag Pfeil; p. 17–56.
   Google Scholar
• Malyshkina TP, Ward DJ. 2016. The Turanian Basin in the Eocene: the new data on the fossil sharks and rays from the Kyzylkum Desert (Uzbekistan). Proc Zool Inst, Russian Acad Sci. 320:50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Mas G. 2003. Presència de Parotodus benedeni (Le Hon, 1871) (Pisces: Chondrichthyes: Otodontidae) al Neogen de Mallorca i Menorca (Illes Balears, Mediterrània occidental). Consideracions taxonòmiques i paleoambientals. Boll Soc Hist Nat Balears. 46:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JA. 1982. Stratigraphy, structure and phosphate deposits of the Pungo River Formation of North Carolina. North Carolina Geol Surv Bull. 87:32 p., 10 plates.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell ED, Tedford RH. 1973. The Enaliarctinae: a new group of extinct aquatic Carnivora and a consideration of the origin of the Otariidae. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 151:201–284.
   Google Scholar
• Newbrey MG, Siversson M, Cook TD, Fotheringham AM, Sanchez RL. 2015. Vertebral morphology, dentition, age, growth, and ecology of the large lamniform shark Cardabiodon ricki. Acta Palaeont Polo. 60:877–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson HC. 1988. Oligocene-middle Miocene depositional systems north of Bakersfield, California: eastern basin equivalents of the Temblor Formation. In: Graham SA, editor. Studies of the geology of the San Joaquin Basin. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. Vol. 60; p. 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, Balk MA. 2015. Body-size trends of the extinct giant shark Carcharocles megalodon: a deep-time perspective on marine apex predators. Paleobiology. 41:479–490.10.1017/pab.2015.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimiento C, MacFadden BJ, Clements CF, Varela S, Jaramillo C, Velez-Juarbe J, Silliman BR. 2016. Geographical distribution patterns of Carcharocles megalodon over time reveal clues about extinction mechanisms. J Biogeog. 43:1645–1655. doi:10.1111/jbi.12754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz M. 2009. Desert sharks. Lehigh Acres (Fl): PaleoPress; 197 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sako K, Hoshi H. 2014. Paleomagnetism and tectonic significance of the Miocene Tomikusa Group in central Honshu, Japan. J Geol So Japan. 120:255–271 (in Japanese).10.5575/geosoc.2014.0025
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk K. 1994. Comparative biology and the importance of cladistic classification: a case study from the sensory biology of squamate reptiles. Biol J Linn Soc. 52:69–82.10.1111/bij.1994.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata H. 1967. Geology of the Miocene Ichishi Group. J Geol Soc Japan. 73:337–346 (in Japanese).10.5575/geosoc.73.337
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 1997. Skeletal anatomy of the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark, Cretoxyrhina mantelli, from the Niobrara Chalk in Kansas. J Vert Paleont. 17:642–652.10.1080/02724634.1997.10011014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2002a. Dental homologies in lamniform sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii). J Morphol. 251:38–72.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2002b. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus (Lamniformes: Lamnidae). J Fossil Res. 35:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2003. date of imprint 2002). The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Lamniformes: Lamnidae. J Fossil Res. 35:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2004/2005. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the sandtiger shark, Carcharias taurus (Lamniformes: Odontaspididae. J Fossil Res. 37:76–81.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2006. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the common thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus (Lamniformes: Alopiidae). J Fossil Res. 39:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K. 2008. Ontogenetic parameters and life history strategies of the late Cretaceous lamniform shark, Cretoxyrhina mantelli, based on vertebral growth increments. J Vert Paleont. 28:21–33.10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[21:OPALHS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Seigel JF. 2005. The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the goblin shark, Mitsukurina owstoni (Lamniformes: Mitsukurinidae). J Fossil Res. 38:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Ward DJ. In press. The oldest fossil record of the megamouth shark from the late Eocene of Denmark and comments on the enigmatic megachasmid origin. Acta Palaeont Polo.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Welton BJ, Long DJ. 2014. A new fossil megamouth shark (Lamniformes: Megachasmidae) from the Oligocene-Miocene of the western United States. J Vert Paleont. 34:281–290.10.1080/02724634.2013.803975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siversson M, Lindgren J, Newbrey MG, Cederström P, Cook TD. 2015. Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Campanian) mid-palaeolatitude sharks of Cretalamna appendiculata type. Acta Palaeont Polo. 60:339–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AG, Smith DG, Funnell BM. 1994. Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic coastlines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 99 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisawa M, Y Honda. 1999. Late early Miocene mollusks of the Haze and Oi formations of the Ichishi Group, central Honshu, Japan. Abst, 106th Meeting Geological Society of Japan; p. 202 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Chinzei K. 1967. Stratigraphy of Tomikusa Group. In: Anancho no kaseki [Fossils of Anan City]. Anan, Nagano Prefecture, Japan: Anancho [Anan City] Educational Committee; p. 6–20 ( in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka T. 2013. Fossil elasombranchs from the Ichishi Group of Lower Miocene in Mie Prefecture, Japan. J Geosci [Chigaku Kenkyu]. 61:93–116 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Underwood CJ, Ward DJ, King C, Antar SM, Zalmout IS, Gingerich PD. 2011. Shark and ray faunas in the Middle and Late Eocene of the Fayum area, Egypt. Proc Geologists’ Asso. 122:47–66.10.1016/j.pgeola.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez S, Pimiento C. 2014. Sharks and rays from the Tonosi Formation (Eocene of Panama). Central Am J Geol. 51:165–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ward LW. 2008. Synthesis of paleontological and stratigraphic investigations at the Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, N.C. (1958–2007). In: Ray CE, Bohaska DJ, Koretsky IA, Ward LW, Barnes LG, editors. Geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, IV. Virginia Mus Nat Hist Spec Pub 14; p. 325–436.
   Google Scholar
• Welton BJ. 2015. A new species of late Early Miocene Cetorhinus (Lamniformes: Cetorhinidae) from the Astoria Formation of Oregon, and coeval Cetorhinus from Washington and California. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles Co Cont Sci. 523:67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Welton BJ, Farish RF. 1993. The collector’s guide to fossil sharks and rays from the Cretaceous of Texas. Lewisville (TX): Before Time; 204 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zalmout ISA, Antar MSM, Shafy EA-E, Metwally MH, Hatab E-BE, Gingerich PD. 2012. Priabonian sharks and rays (Late Eocene: Neoselachii) from Minqar Tabaghbagh in the western Qattara Depression, Egypt. Univ Michigan Mus Paleont Cont. 32:71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Zhelezko VI, Kozlov VA. 1999. Elasmobranhii i biostratigraphia paleogena Zauralia i Srednei Asii [ Elasmobranchii and Palaeogene biostratigraphy of Transural and Central Asia]. Materialy po stratigrafii i paleontologii Urala. 3: 324 p.
   Google Scholar