Bite force and body mass of the fossil rodent Telicomys giganteus (Caviomorpha, Dinomyidae)

References

• Alexander RMCN. 1981. Factors of safety in the structure of animals. Sci Prog. 67:109–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameghino C. 1916. Algunas observaciones curiosas sobre una cabeza del género Tetrastylus de Catamarca. Physis. 2:429–430.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1883. Sobre una nueva colección de mamíferos fósiles recogidos por el Profesor Scalabrini en las barrancas del Paraná [About a new collection of fossil mammals collected by Professor Scalabrini in the cliffs of Paraná]. Bol Acad Nac Cienc Córdoba. 5: 257–306.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1885. Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles oligocenos recogidos por el profesor Pedro Scalabrini y pertenecientes al Museo Provincial de la Ciudad del Paraná. Bol Acad Nac Cienc Córdoba. 8:5–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1886. Contribuciones al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de los terrenos terciarios antiguos del Paraná. Bol Acad Nac Cienc Córdoba. 9:5–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1889. Contribución al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de la República Argentina. Actas Acad Nac Cienc. 6:1–1027.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1891a. Caracteres diagnósticos de cincuenta especies nuevas de mamíferos fósiles argentinos. Rev Argent Hist Nat. 1:129–167.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1891b. Mamíferos y aves fósiles argentinas. Especies nuevas, adiciones y correcciones. Rev Argent Hist Nat. 1:240–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ameghino F. 1904. Nuevas especies de mamíferos cretáceos y terciarios de la República Argentina. An Soc Cient Argent. 58:35–71, 182–192, 225–291.
   Google Scholar
• Becerra Federico, Aldo I. Vassallo, Alejandra I. Echeverría, Adrià Casinos. 2012. Scaling and adaptations of incisors and cheek teeth in caviomorph rodents (Rodentia, Hystricognathi). Journal of Morphology, 273: 1150–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand OC, Schillaci MA, Silcox MT. 2015. Cranial dimensions as estimators of body mass and locomotion habits in extant and fossil rodents. J Vert Paleo. 36:e1014905. DOI:10.1080/02724634.2015.1014905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco RE. 2008. The uncertainties of the largest fossil rodent. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 275:1957–1958.10.1098/rspb.2008.0551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco RE, Rinderknecht A, Lecuona G. 2011. The bite force of the largest fossil rodent (Hystricognathi, Caviomorpha, Dinomyidae). Lethaia. 45:157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondesio P. 1978. La presencia del género Carlesia (Rodentia, Dinomyidae, Eumegamyinae) en la formación Arroyo Chasicó (Plioceno Temprano), Provincia de Buenos Aires. Publicaciones del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata “Lorenzo Scaglia”. 2:198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister G. 1885. Examen crítico de los mamíferos y reptiles fósiles denominados por D. Augusto Bravard y mencionados en su obra precedente. Anal Mus Públ Buenos Aires. 3:95–174.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen P. 2007. Evolutionary implications of bite mechanics and feeding ecology in bears. J Zool. 272:423–443.10.1111/jzo.2007.272.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins LR, Eisenberg JF. 1972. Notes on the behaviour and breeding of pacaranas (Dinomys branickii) in captivity. Int Zoo Yearb. 12:108–114.10.1111/izy.1972.12.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Cooper G, Schiller AL. 1975. Anatomy of the Guinea pig. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; p. [14] + 417.
   Google Scholar
• Cox PG, Blanco RE, Rinderknecht A. 2015. Predicting bite force and cranial biomechanics in the largest fossil rodent using finite element analysis. J Anat. 226:215–223.10.1111/joa.2015.226.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox PG, Jeffery N. 2011. Reviewing the morphology of the jaw-closing musculature in squirrels, rats, and guinea pigs with contrast-enhanced microCT. Anat Rec. 294:915–928.10.1002/ar.21381
   Google Scholar
• Damuth J, Mc Fadden BJ. 1990. Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 1–397.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins R. 2004. The ancestor’s tale: a pilgrimage to the dawn of life. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin Company; p. 1–673.
   Google Scholar
• Druzinsky RE. 2010a. Funcional anatomy of incisal biting in Aplodontia rufa and sciuromorph rodents-part 1: masticatory muscles, skull shape and digging. Cells Tissues Organs. 191:510–522.10.1159/000284931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druzinsky RE. 2010b. Funcional anatomy of incisal biting in Aplodontia rufa and sciuromorph rodents-part 2: sciuromorphy is efficacious for production of force at the incisors. Cells Tissues Organs. 192:50–63.10.1159/000284930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgeworth W. 1935. The cranial muscles of the vertebrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. viii + 493.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández de Álvarez E. 1958. Sobre nuevos restos de Eumegamysops praependens (Amegh.) Kragl. Rev Asoc Geol Argent. 13:87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz KMPMB, Izar P, Sato T, Nishida SM. 2012. Social and spatial relationships of capybaras in a semi-confined production system. In: Moreira RJ, Ferraz KMPMB, Herrera EA, Macdonald DW, editors. Capybara: biology, use and conservation of an exceptional neotropicla species. New York: Springer; p. 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Frailey CD. 1986. Late Miocene and Holocene mammals, exclusive of the Notoungulata, of the Río Acre region, Western Amazonia. Contrib Sci. 374:1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman PW, Lemen CA. 2008. A simple morphological predictor of bite force in rodents. J Zool. 275:418–422.10.1111/jzo.2008.275.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves WS. 1995. Functional predictions from theoretical models of the skull and jaws in reptiles and mammals. In: Thomason J, editor. Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 1–277.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins P, Croft D, Bostelmann E, Rinderknecht A, Ubilla M. 2011. Paleodiet and Paleoenvironment of fossil giant rodents from Uruguay. J Vertebr Paleontol. Meeting programs and abstracts, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 31:125–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins SSB. 2008. Reassessing the mass of exceptionally large rodents using tooth-row length and area as proxies for body mass. J Mammal. 89:232–243.10.1644/06-MAMM-A-306.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1926. Los grandes roedores terciarios de la Argentina y sus relaciones con ciertos géneros pleistocenos de las Antillas. Anal Mus Nac Hist Nat Buenos Aires. 34:121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1930. Descripción de un interesante roedor eumegámido descubierto en el Uruguay. Gyriabrus teisseirei, n. sp. Rev Soc Amigos Arqueol. 4:21–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1931. Cuatro notas paleontológicas (sobre Octomylodon aversus Amegh., Argyrolagus palmeri Amegh., Tetrastylus montanus Amegh., y Muñizia paranensis n. gen. n. sp.). Physis. 10:242–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kraglievich L. 1932. Diagnosis de nuevos géneros y especies de roedores cávidos y eumegámidos fósiles de la Argentina. Rectificación genérica de algunas especies conocidas y adiciones al conocimiento de otras. An Soc Cient Argent. 114(4):155–181; (5–6):211–237.
   Google Scholar
• Lessa E. 1990. Morphological evolution of subterranean mammals: integrating structural, functional, and ecological perspectives. In: Nevo E, Reig OA, editors. Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss; p. 2011–2230.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh AF, Cox PG. 2016a. Functional implications of craniomandibular morphology in African mole-rats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Biol J Linn Soc. 117:447–462.10.1111/bij.2016.117.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh AF, Cox PG. 2016b. The impact of digging on craniodental morphology and integration. J Evol Biol. 29:2383–2394.10.1111/jeb.2016.29.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meers MB. 2002. Maximum bite force and prey size of Tyrannosaurus rex and their relationships to the inference of feeding behavior. Hist Biol. 16:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Millien V. 2008. The largest among the smallest: the body mass of the giant rodent Josephoartigasia monesi. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 275:1953–1955.10.1098/rspb.2008.0087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millien V, Bovy H. 2010. When teeth and bone disagree: body mass estimation of a giant extinct rodent. J Mammal. 91:11–18.10.1644/08-MAMM-A-347R1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mones A. 1986. Palaeovertebrata Sudamericana. Catálogo Sistemático de los Vertebrados Fósiles de América del Sur. Parte I. Lista preliminar y bibliografía. Cour Forsch-Inst Senckenberg. 82:1–625.
   Google Scholar
• Mones A. 1997. Estudios sobre la familia Dinomyidae, II. Aportes para una osteología comparada de Dinomys branickii Peters, 1873 (Mammalia: Rodentia). Comun Paleontol Mus Hist Nat Montevideo. 29:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Naples V. 1987. Reconstruction of cranial morphology and analysis of function in the Pleistocene ground sloth Nothrotheriops shastense (Mammalia, Megatheriidae). Contrib Sci. 389:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Opazo JC. 2005. A molecular timescale for caviomorph rodents (Mammalia, Hystricognathi). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 37:932–937.10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual R. 1967. Familia Dinomyidae. In: Borrello AV, editor. Paleontografía Bonaerense, Vol. 4 ( Vertebrata). La Plata: Comisión de Investigación Científica; p. 123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock RI. 1926. The external characters of a young female Dinomys branickii exhibited in the society’s gardens. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 96:221–230.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1926.tb01544.x
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds PS. 2002. How big is a giant? The importance of method in estimating body size of extinct mammals. J Mammal. 83:321–332.10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0321:HBIAGT>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht A, Blanco RE. 2008. The largest fossil rodent. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 275:923–928.10.1098/rspb.2007.1645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht A, Blanco RE. 2015. History, taxonomy and paleobiology of giant fossil rodents (Hystricognathi, Dinomyidae). In: Cox PG, Hautier L, editors. Evolution of the rodents: advances in phylogeny, functional morphology and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 164–185.10.1017/CBO9781107360150
   Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht A, Bostelmann E, Ubilla M. 2011. New genus of giant Dinomyidae (Rodentia: Hystricognathi: Caviomorpha) from the late Miocene of Uruguay. J Mammal. 92:169–178.10.1644/10-MAMM-A-099.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht A, Bostelmann E, Ubilla M. 2017. Making a giant rodent: cranial anatomy and ontogenetic development in the genus Isostylomys (Mammalia: Hystricognathi: Dinomyidae). J Syst Palaeontol. DOI:10.1080/14772019.2017.1285360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovereto C. 1914. Los estratos araucanos y sus fósiles. Anal Mus Nac Hist Nat Buenos Aires. 25:1–247.
   Google Scholar
• Saban R. 1968. Musculature de la tête. In: Grassé PP, editor. Traité de Zoologie. Paris: Masson & Cie; p. 1–870.
   Google Scholar
• Sanborn CC. 1931. Notes on Dinomys. Field Mus Nat Hist Zool Ser. 18:149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Villagra MR, Aguilera O, Horovitz I. 2003. The anatomy of the world’s largest extinct rodent. Science. 301:1708–1710.10.1126/science.1089332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh K, Fumihiko I. 2006. Jaw muscle functional anatomy in northern grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leucogaster, a carnivorous murid. J Morphol. 267:987–999.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman G. 1906. Ubre die ventrale Facialmuskulatur einiger Säugetiere, besonders der Monotremen. Fest für Palmen. 18:4–67.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason JJ. 1991. Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some mammals. Can J Zool. 69:2326–2333.10.1139/z91-327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullberg T. 1899–1900. Ueber das System der Nagethiere: Eine Phylogenetische Studie. Nova Acta Regiae Soc Sci Upsaliensis. 18:1–514.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull WD. 1970. Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana Geol. 18:149–356.
   Google Scholar
• Upham NS, Patterson BD. 2015. Evolution of caviomorph rodents: a complete phylogeny and timetree for living genera. In: Vasallo AI, Antenucci D, editors. Biology of caviomorph rodents: diversity and evolution. Buenos Aires: SAREM; p. 63–120.
   Google Scholar
• Van Daele PAAG, Herrel A, Adriaens D. 2009. Biting performance in teeth-digging African mole-rats (Fukomys, Bathyergidae, Rodentia). Physiol Biochem Zool. 82:40–50.10.1086/594379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Valkenburgh B. 1990. Skeletal and dental predictors of body mass in carnivores. In: Damuth J, MacFadden BJ, editors. Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; p. 181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno SF, De Iuliis G. 2003. Evidence for advanced carnivory in fossil armadillos (Mammalia: Xenarthra: Dasypodidae). Paleobiology. 29:123–138.10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0123:EFACIF>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich MG, Verzi DH. 1995. Los roedores Caviomorphos. In: Alberdi MT, Leone G, Tonni EP, editors. Evolución biológica y climática de la región pampeana durante los últimos cinco millones de años. Monografías del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; p. 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• White TG, Alberico MS. 1992. Dinomys branickii. Mamm Spec. 410:1–5.10.2307/3504284
   Google Scholar
• Windle BCA, Parson FG. 1899. On the myology of the Edentata. Part 1. Muscles of the head, neck and forelimb. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 1899:314–339.
   Google Scholar
• Woods CA, Hermanson W. 1985. Myology of Hystricognath rodents: an analysis of form, function, and phylogeny. NATO ASI Ser A. 92:515–548.
   Google Scholar
• Wroe S, McHenry C, Thomason JJ. 2005. Bite club: comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 272:619–625.10.1098/rspb.2004.2986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenuto RR, Vassallo AI, Busch C. 2002. Comportamiento social y reproductivo del roedor subterráneo solitario Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) en condiciones de semicautiverio. Rev Chilena Hist Nat. 75:165–177.
   Google Scholar