A new Palaeocene Megalopidae (Teleostei, Elopomorpha) from the phosphate basins of Morocco

References

• Adams AJ, Horodysky AZ, McBride RS, Guindon K, Shenker J, MacDonald TC, Harwell HD, Ward R, Carpenter K. 2014. Global conservation status and research needs for tarpons (Megalopidae), ladyfishes (Elopidae) and bonefishes (Albulidae). Fish Fisheries. 15:280–311.10.1111/faf.2014.15.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarado-Ortega J, González-Rodríguez KA, Blanco-Piñón A, Espinosa-Arrubarena L, Ovalles-Damián E. 2006. Mesozoic Osteichthyans of Mexico. In: Vega, FJ, Nyborg TG, Perilliat MdC, Montellano-Ballesteros M, Cevallos-Feriz SRS, Quiroz-Barroso SA, editors. Studies on Mexican paleontology. Springer. p. 169–207.10.1007/1-4020-3985-9
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1934. Sur la présence d’un crocodilien du genre Crocodylus dans les gisements de phosphates du Maroc. Comptes Rendus sommaires des Séances de la Société Géologique de France. 9:108–110.
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1935. Note préliminaire sur les vertébrés fossiles des phosphates du Maroc. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 5e série. 5:413–440.
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1936. Nouvelles observations sur les faunes et la stratigraphie des phosphates du Maroc. Comptes Rendus sommaires des Séances de la Société Géologique de France. 5:212–212.
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1937. Nouvelles observations sur la série phosphatée du Maroc. Comptes Rendus sommaires des Séances de la Société Géologique de France. 5:183–184.
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1950. Résultats généraux de l’étude des Vertébrés fossiles des phosphates du Maroc. Comptes rendus des séances mensuelles de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc. 5:70–72.
   Google Scholar
• Arambourg C. 1952. Les Vertébrés fossiles des gisements de phosphates (Maroc, Algérie, Tunisie). Notes et mémoires du Service géologique du Maroc. 92:1–372.
   Google Scholar
• Arratia G. 2000. Remarkable teleostean fishes from the Late Jurassic of southern Germany and their phylogenetic relationships. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe (Fossil Record). 3:137–179.
   Google Scholar
• Arratia G. 2010. Critical analysis of the impact of fossils on teleostean phylogenies, especially that of basal teleosts. In: Elliott DK, Maisey JG, Yu X, Miao D, editors. Morphology, phylogeny and paleobiogeography of fossil fishes. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 247–274.
   Google Scholar
• Bardack D. 1970. A new teleost from the Oldman Formation (Cretaceous) of Alberta. Pub Palaeontol. 3:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bardet N, Gheerbrant E, Cappetta H, Noubhani A, Jouve S, Bourdon E, Pereda Suberbiola X, Jalil N-E, Vincent P, Houssaye A, et al. 2017. Les Vertébrés des Phosphates crétacés-paléogènes (70,6 – 46,6 Ma) du Maroc. In: Zouhri S, editor. Paléontologie des vertébrés du Maroc: état des connaissances. Paris: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, nouvelle série, 180. p. 351–452.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomai A. 2010. Revision of Flindersichthys denmeadi Longman 1932, a marine teleost from the Lower Cretaceous of the Great Artesian Basin, Queensland. Memoirs Queensland Mus Nat. 55:43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Beaufort (de) LF. 1926. On a collection of marine fishes from the Miocene of South Celebes. Jaarboek van het Mijnwezen in Nederlandsch-Indië. 54:115–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdon E, Amaghzaz M, Bouya B. 2010. Pseudotoothed birds (Aves, Odontopterygiformes) from the Early Tertiary of Morocco. Am Mus Novit. 3704:1–71.10.1206/3704.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman DB. 1990. Paleoecology of the Judith River Formation (Campanian) of Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada: Evidence from vertebrate microfossil localities. Palaeogeograph Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 78(1):37–54.10.1016/0031-0182(90)90203-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brives A. 1919. Le Suessonien dans le Maroc central. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris. 168:776–777.
   Google Scholar
• Casier E. 1966. Faune ichthyologique du London Clay. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).
   Google Scholar
• Cavin L, Bardet N, Cappetta H, Gheerbrant E, Iarochène M, Sudre J. 2000. A new Palaeocene albulid (Teleostei: Elopomorpha) from the Ouled Abdoun phosphatic basin. Morocco Geological Magazine. 137:583–591.10.1017/S0016756800004647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope ED. 1887. Geology and palaeontology – zittel’s manuel of palaeontology. Am Nat. 21:1014–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree RE, Cyr EC, Dean JM. 1995. Age and growth of tarpon, Megalops atlanticus, from South Florida waters. Fish Bull. 93:619–628.
   Google Scholar
• El Houssaini Darif K, Jalil N-E, Bouya B, Amaghzaz M. 2009. Deux nouveaux téléostéens des gisements des Phosphates du Maroc (Bassin des Ouled Abdoun, Eocène): anatomie et systématique. 1st International Congress on North African Vertebrate Palaeontology; Marrakesh, Morocco. p. 66.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo FJ, Gallo V, Leal MEC. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships of the elopomorph fish †Paraelops cearensis Silva Santos revisited: Evidence from new specimens. Cretaceous Res. 37:148–154.10.1016/j.cretres.2012.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filleul A, Lavoué S. 2001. Basal teleosts and the question of elopomorph monophyly. Morphological and molecular approaches. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la vie. 324:393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1973a. A revision of the elopiform fishes, fossil and recent. Bull Br Mus (Nat His) Geol. 10( supplement):1–222.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL. 1973b. Relationships of elopomorphs. In: Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson C, editors. Interrelationships of fishes. London: Academic Press; p. 351–368.
   Google Scholar
• Forey PL, Littlewood DTJ, Ritchie P, Meyer A. 1996. 9. Interrelationships of elopomorph fishes. In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. Interrelationships of Fishes. San Diego: Academic Press; p. 175–191.10.1016/B978-012670950-6/50010-2
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Beckett HT, Close RA, Johanson Z. 2016. The English Chalk and London Clay: two remarkable British bony fish Lagerstätten. In: Johanson Z, Barret PM, Richter M, et al., editors. Arthur Smith Woodward: his life and influence on modern vertebrate palaeontology. London: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Vol. 430(1). p. 165–200.
   Google Scholar
• Gheerbrant E, Sudre J, Cappetta H. 1996. A Palaeocene proboscidean from Morocco. Nature. 383:68–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried MD, Fordyce RE. 2015. Novel lateral line and caudal fin morphology in a Paleogene ‘tarpon’ (Megalopidae) from New Zealand. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 75th Annual Meeting; Dallas, USA. p. 134.
   Google Scholar
• Grande L, Bemis WE. 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of Amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Suppl J Verteb Paleontol. 18(1), Memoir 4:1–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood PH, Rosen DE, Weitzman SH, Myers GS. 1966. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes with a provisional classification of living forms. Bull Am Mus Nat His. 131:341–455.
   Google Scholar
• Herman J. 1972. Contribution à la connaissance de la faune ichthyologique des phosphates du Maroc. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique. 95:271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan DS, Gilbert CH. 1882. Synopsis of the fishes of North America. Bull US Natl Mus. 16:1–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Khalloufi B, Brito PM, Cavin L, Dutheil DB. 2017. Revue des ichthyofaunes mésozoïques et cénozoïques marocaines. In: Zouhri S, editor. Paléontologie des vertébrés du Maroc: état des connaissances. Paris: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, nouvelle série, Vol. 180. p. 167–248.
   Google Scholar
• Leal MEC, Schultz BP, Madsen H, Villa C, Lynnerup N, Rosenkrants NJ, Veje U, Bonde N. 2015. Eocene tarpons from the North Sea region. Denmark: PeerJ PrePrints. 2015/10/01;3:e1410v1411.
   Google Scholar
• Müller JP. 1844. Über den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden und über das natürliche System der Fische. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenchaften zu Berlin. 117–216 +vi.
   Google Scholar
• Murray AM, Hoşgör I. 2012. An early Oligocene elopiform fish from a new locality in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. J Verteb Paleontol. 32:296–303.10.1080/02724634.2012.648248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman AD, Brinkman DB. 2005. Fishes of the fluvial beds. In: Currie PJ, Koppelhus EB, editors. Dinosaur provincial park: a spectacular ancient ecosystem revealed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; p. 167–185.
   Google Scholar
• Noubhani A, Cappetta H. 1997. Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des bassins à phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien-Lutétien basal). Systématique, biostratigraphie, évolution et dynamique des faunes. Palaeo Ichthyologica. 8:1–327.
   Google Scholar
• Obermiller LE, Pfeiler E. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of elopomorph fishes inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:202–214.10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00327-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson C, Rosen DE. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull Am Mus Nat His. 158:81–172.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy RW, Schneider VP, Applegate SP, McLellan JH, Meyer RL, Slaughter BH. 2001. The neogene sharks, rays, and bony fishes from Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina. In: Ray CE, Bohaska DJ, editors. Geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, III. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Contribution to Paleontology, Number 90. p. 71–202.
   Google Scholar
• Taverne L. 1974. L’ostéologie d’Elops Linné, C., 1766 (Pisces, Elopiformes) et son intérêt phylogénétique. Académie Royale de Belgique, Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences, coll in-8°, sér 2. 41(2):1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Taverne L. 1999. Ostéologie et position systématique d’Arratiaelops vectensis gen. nov., téléostéen élopiforme du Wealdien (Crétacé inférieur) d’Angleterre et de Belgique. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique - Sciences de la Terre. 69:77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Vega-Rodríguez B, Ayala-Pérez L. 2014. Edad y crecimiento del sábalo Megalops atlanticus en la costa de Campeche, México. Revista de biología marina y oceanografía. 49:351–359.10.4067/S0718-19572014000200013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vullo R, Cavin L, Khalloufi B, Amaghzaz M, Bardet N, Jalil N-E, Jourani E, Khaldoune F, Gheerbrant E. 2017. A unique Cretaceous-Paleogene lineage of piranha-jawed pycnodont fishes. Sci Rep. 7(1):6802.10.1038/s41598-017-06792-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weems RE. 1999. Part 4. Actinopterygian fishes from the Fisher/Sullivan site. In: Weems RE, Grimsley GJ, editors. Early Eocene Vertebrates and Plants from the Fisher/Sullivan Site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia. Charlottesville: Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, Pub 152. p. 53–99.
   Google Scholar
• Westgate JW. 2001. Paleoecology and Biostratigraphy of Marginal Marine Gulf Coast Eocene Vertebrate Localities. In: Gunnell GF, editor. Eocene Biodiversity: Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats. Boston, MA: Springer US. p. 263–297.10.1007/978-1-4615-1271-4
   Google Scholar
• Wiley EO, Johnson GD. 2010. A teleost classification based on monophyletic groups. In: Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Origin and phylogenetic interrelationships of teleosts. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; p. 123–182.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward AS. 1901. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). 4, containing the Actinopterygian Teleostemi of the Suborders Isospondyli (in part), Ostariophysii, Apodes, Percesoces, Hemibranchii, Acanthopterygii and Anacanthini. London: Trustees.
   Google Scholar