First report of Chelediscus Rushton, 1966 (Trilobita) from Western Gondwana, with description of a new species from the Cambrian Series 2 of Spain

References

• Adrain JM. 2011. Class trilobita walch, 1771. In: Zhang Z–Q, editor. Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (ed. Z-Q Zhang). Zootaxa. 3148(1):104–109. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.15.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlberg P, Cederström P, Babcock E. 2016. Cambrian Series 2 biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy of Scandinavia: a reappraisal. In: Laurie JR, Kruse PD, García-Bellido DC, Holmes JD, editors. Palaeo Down Under 2, Adelaide, July 2016. Geological Society of Australia Abstracts: p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Álvaro JJ, Ahlberg P, Babcock LE, Bordonaro OL, Choi DC, Cooper RA, Ergaliev GKH, Gapp IW, Ghobadi PM, Hughes, et al. 2013. Global Cambrian trilobite palaeobiogeography assessed using parsimony analysis of endemicity. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 38(1):273–296. doi:10.1144/M38.19.
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio Yagüe A, Gil Cid MD. 1972. Hallazgo de Trilobites en el Cámbrico de los Montes-Isla de Toledo. Est. Geol 28:105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Axheimer N, Ahlberg P, Cederström P. 2007. A new lower Cambrian eodiscoid trilobite fauna from Swedish Lapland and its implications for intercontinental correlation. Geol. Mag 144(6):953–961. doi:10.1017/S0016756807003597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azor A. 2004. Zona de Ossa-Morena. In: Vera Torres JA, editor. Geología de España. Sociedad Geológica de España e Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Madrid; p. 65–198.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström J, Hou X–G. 2005. Early Palaeozoic non-lamellipedian Arthropods. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA, editors. Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. CRC Press; pp. 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Collantes L, Mayoral E, Chirivella JB, Gozalo R. 2020. New data on Marocella (Mollusca, Helcionelloida) from the Cambrian (Series 2–Miaolingian) of the Iberian Peninsula. GFF. 142(3):190–205. doi:10.1080/11035897.2020.1762722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collantes L, Mayoral E, Liñán E, Gozalo R. 2021a. Atopidae (Trilobita) in the upper Marianian (Cambrian Series 2, stage 4) of Iberia. J. Paleontol 95(1):123–132. doi:10.1017/jpa.2020.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collantes L, Mayoral E, Liñán E, Gozalo R, Pereira S. in press. The trilobite Serrodiscus Richter & Richter from Iberia, with systematic review of the genus and its international correlation through the Cambrian series 2. Bull. Geosci 97(3). doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collantes L, Pereira S, Mayoral E, Liñán E, Gozalo R. 2021b. On Callavia (Trilobita) from the Cambrian series 2 of Iberia with systematic status of the genus. J. Paleontol 95(6):1226–1240. doi:10.1017/jpa.2021.46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton TJ, Fortey RA. 2005. Comparative morphology and relationships of the Agnostida. In: Koenemann S, Jenner R, editors. Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. Crustac. Issues. Boca Raton: CRC Press; Vol. 16; p. 95–136.
   Google Scholar
• Courtessole R. 1973. Le Cambrien Moyen de la Montagne Noire. Biostratigraphie. Imprimerie d’Oc, Toulousse: 1–248.
   Google Scholar
• Dalziel IWD. 1997. Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic geography and tectonics: review, hypothesis, environmental speculation. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull 109(1):16–42. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0016:ONPGAT>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado JFN. 1904. La faune cambrienne du Haut-Alentejo (Portugal). Comm. Comis. Serv. Geol. Port 5:307–374.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher T. 2003. Ovatoryctocara granulata: the key to a global Cambrian Stage boundary and the correlation of the olenellid, redlichiid and paradoxidid realms. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol 70:73–102.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher T, Rushton AWA. 2007. The Cambrian Fauna of the Leny Limestone, Perthshire, Scotland. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 98(2):199–218. doi:10.1017/S1755691007006123.
   Google Scholar
• Fortey RA 1997. Classification, In: Kaesler RL, editor. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised (Vol. 1). Kansas. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence; p. 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer G. 1988. Agnostida aus dem höheren Unterkambrium und der Mittelkambrium von Marokko. Teil 2: eodiscina. Neues Jahrb. fur Geol. Palaont. Abh. 177:93–133.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer G. 2005. The base of a revised middle Cambrian: are suitable concepts for a series boundary in reach? Geosci. J. 9:81–99. doi:10.1007/BF02910571
   Google Scholar
• Geyer G. 2019. A comprehensive Cambrian correlation chart. Episodes. 42(4):321–332. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2019/019026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer G, Elicki O. 1995. The Lower Cambrian trilobites from the Görlitz Synclinorium (Germany) - review and new results. PalZ. 69(9):87–119. doi:10.1007/BF02985976.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer G, Shergold JH. 2000. The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes. 5(23):188–195. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2000/v23i3/006.
   Google Scholar
• Gozalo R, Chirivella-Martorell JB, Dies Álvarez ME, Liñán E, Martínez-Pérez C. 2016. Trilobites from an archaeocyath bearing level of Cambrian Stage 4 in the Cantabrian Mountains (northern Spain). In: Laurie JR, Kruse PD, García-Bellido DC, Holmes JD, editors. Palaeo Down Under 2, Adelaide, July Geological Society of Australia Abstracts, p. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Howell BF. 1935. Cambrian and Ordovician trilobites from Herault, France. J. Paleontol 9(3):222–238. doi:10.2307/1298162.
   Google Scholar
• Jell PA. 1975. Australian middle Cambrian eodiscoids with a review of the superfamily. Palaeontogr. Abt. A: Palaozool 150:1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Jell PA. 1997. Introduction to the Suborder Eodiscina. In: Kaesler RL, editor. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised (Vol. 1). Kansas: Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence; p. 384–405.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T. 1939. On the agnostids (Part 1). J. Fac. Sci. Univ. 5(5):70–198. Tokyo, Sect. II.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T. 1943. Brief notes on the eodiscids 1, their classification with a description of a new species and a new variety. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser 19(1):37–42. doi:10.2183/pjab1912.19.37.
   Google Scholar
• Legg DA, Sutton MD, Edgecombe GD. 2013. Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Nat. Comm 4(3485):1–7. doi:10.1038/ncomms3485.
   Google Scholar
• Liñán E. 1984. Introducción al problema de la paleogeografía del Cámbrico de Ossa-Morena. Cuad. Lab. Xeol. Laxe 8:283–314.
   Google Scholar
• Liñán E, Quesada C. 1990. Ossa-Morena Zone, Stratigraphy, Rift phase (Cambrian). In: Dallmeyer RD, Martínez García E, editors. Pre-Mesozoic Geology of Iberia. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 259–266.
   Google Scholar
• Malinky JM, Geyer G. 2019. Cambrian Hyolitha of Siberian, Baltican and Avalonian aspect in east Laurentian North America: taxonomy and palaeobiogeography. Alcheringa. 43(2):171–203. doi:10.1080/03115518.2019.1567813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKerrow WS, Scotese CR, Brasier MD. 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. J. Geol. Soc 149(4):599–606. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0599.
   Google Scholar
• Moysiuk J, Caron JB. 2019. Burgess Shale fossils shed light on the agnostid problem. Proc. R. Soc. B 286(1894):1–9. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller KJ, Walossek D. 1987. Morphology, ontogeny, and life habit of Agnostus pisiformis from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. Foss. Strat 19:1–124.
   Google Scholar
• Öpik AA. 1975. The Cymbric Vale fauna of New South Wales and Early Cambrian biostratigraphy. BMR Austral. Bull. 159:1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson JR. 2020. The trouble with trilobites: classification, phylogeny and the cryptogenesis problem. Geol. Mag 157(1):35–46. doi:10.1017/S0016756819000426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng SC, Babcock L, Ahlberg P. 2020. The Cambrian period. In: Gradstein F, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM, editors. Geologic time scale, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 565–629.
   Google Scholar
• Pillola GL. 1991. Trilobites du Cambrien inférieur du SW de la Sardaigne, Italie. Palaeontogr. Ital 78:1–174.
   Google Scholar
• Rasetti F. 1952. Revision of North American trilobites of the family Eodiscidae. J. Paleontol 26(3):434–451.
   Google Scholar
• Rasetti F. 1967. Lower and Middle Cambrian trilobite faunas from the Taconic sequence of New York. Smith. Misc. Collect 152(4):1–112.
   Google Scholar
• Rasetti F. 1972. Cambrian trilobite faunas of Sardinia. Acc. Naz. Linei. Mem. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. E Nat. 8(11):1–100.
   Google Scholar
• Repina LN. 1972. Trilobity tarynskogo gorizonta razrezov nizhnego kembriya r. Sukharikhi (Igarskiy rayon) (Trilobites from the Taryn Horizon of the Lower Cambrian sections in the Sukharikha River (Igarka area)). In: Zhuravleva IT, editor. Problemy biostratigrafii i paleontologii nizhnego kembriya Sibiri (Problems of Lower Cambrian stratigraphy and palaeontology in Siberia). Moscow: Nauka; p. 184–216.
   Google Scholar
• Richter R, Ricther E. 1941. Die Faune des Unter-Kambrians von Cala in Andalusien. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges 455:1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Robison R, Rosova AV, Rowell AJ, Fletcher TP. 1977. Cambrian boundaries and divisions. Lethaia. 10(3): 275–262. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1977.tb00619.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton AWA. 1966. The Cambrian trilobites from the purley shales of Warwickshire. Palaeontogr. Soc. Monogr 120(511):1–55. doi:10.1080/25761900.2022.12131699.
   Google Scholar
• Scotese CR, McKerrow WS. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction. In: mcKerrow WS, Scotese CS. editors. Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geol. Soc. Mem. 12(1):1–12. doi:10.1144/GSL.MEM.1990.012.01.01.
   Google Scholar
• Sdzuy K. 1962. Trilobiten aus dem Unter-Kambrium der Sierra Morena (S. Spanien). Senckenberg. Lethaea. 43(3):181–229.
   Google Scholar
• Sdzuy K. 1969. Bioestratigrafía de la Griotte Cámbrica de los Barrios de Luna (León) y de otras sucesiones comparables. Trab. de Geol, 2:45-58.
   Google Scholar
• Sdzuy K. 1995. Acerca del conocimiento actual del Sistema Cámbrico y del límite Cámbrico Inferior-Cámbrico Medio. In: Gámez Vintaned JA, Liñán E, editors. Memorias de las IV Jornadas Aragonesas de Paleontología: “La expansión de la vida en el Cámbrico”. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”; p. 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda A, Liñán E, Chirivella-Martorell JB, Gámez Vintaned JA, Gozalo R. 2022. Biostratigraphy of the Ribota and Huérmeda formations (Cambrian Series 2) in the Comarca del Aranda (Zaragoza province), Iberian chains (NE Spain). Span. J. Palaeontol 37(1):101–122. doi:10.7203/sjp.24492.
   Google Scholar
• Shaler NS. 1888. On the geology of the Cambrian District of Bristol county. Massachusetts. Bull. Mus. of Comp. Zool 2(16):13–41.
   Google Scholar
• Šnajdr M. 1958. Trilobiti českého středního kambria. Rozpravy Ústředního ústavu geologického. 24:1–280.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg FA, Geyer G, Kruse PD, McCollum LB, Pegel TV, Żylińska A, Zhuravlev A. 2016. International correlation of the Cambrian series 2-3, Stages 4-5 boundary interval. Australas. Palaeontol. Mem 49:83–124.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott CD. 1890. Descriptive notes of new genera and species from the lower Cambrian or Olenellus zone of North America. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus 12(763):33–46. doi:10.5479/si.00963801.763.33.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott CD. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. United States geological survey. Monograph. 51(1):1–872.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse FW. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of North-eastern Australia, Part. 2: trilobita (Miomera). Queensland Mus. Mem. 11(1):79–112.
   Google Scholar
• Yochelson EL, Gil Cid MD. 1984. Reevaluation of the systematic position of Scenella. Lethaia. 17(4):331–340. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1984.tb02024.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ahlberg P, Babcock LE, Choi DK, Geyer G, Gozalo R, Hollingsworth JS, Li G, Naimark EB, Pegel T, et al. 2017. Challenges in defining the base of Cambrian Series 2 and Stage 3. Earth-Sci. Rev 172:124–139. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar