Taphonomic Signature and Diet of Puma (Puma concolor): Study of Bones Recovered in Scats from Sierra de las Quijadas National Park (San Luis, Central Argentina)

References

• Alonso Roldán V, Udrizar Sauthier DE, Giannoni SM, Campos CM. 2019. Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Buenos Aires: Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina. [accessed 2022 July 04]. http://cma.sarem.org.ar.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez MC, Alcaraz AP, Kaufmann CA, Gatica A, Ochoa A. 2021. Restos óseos ingeridos por puma (Puma concolor) en el Parque Nacional Sierra de las Quijadas (San Luis, Argentina): aportes para la construcción de modelos tafonómicos regionales. Archaeofauna. 30:31–53. doi:10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.003.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez MC, Kaufmann CA, Massigoge A, Gutiérrez MA, Rafuse DJ, Scheifler NA, González ME. 2012. Bone modification and destruction patterns of leporid carcasses by the Geoffroy`s cat (Leopardus geoffroyi): an experimental study. Quat Int. 278:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.11.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews P. 1990. Owls, caves and fossils. London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews P, Fernández-Jalvo Y. 1997. Surface modifications of the Sima de los Huesos fossil humans. J Hum Evol. 33(2–3):191–217. doi:10.1006/jhev.1997.0137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APN (Administración de Parques Nacionales). 2017. Plan de Gestión del Parque Nacional Sierra de las Quijadas. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Buenos Aires: Administración de Parques Nacionales de Argentina. [accessed 2022 March 04]. https://sib.gob.ar/archivos/PG_PNSQ_2017_VERSION_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arilla M, Rosell J, Blasco R. 2020. A neo-taphonomic approach to human campsites modified by carnivores. Sci Rep. 10(1):6659. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63431-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriaza MC, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Yravedra J, Baquedano E, Petraglia MD. 2016. Lions as bone accumulators? paleontological and ecological implications of a modern bone assemblage from olduvai gorge. PLoS ONE. 11(5):e0153797. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM. 1985. Taphonomy’s contributions to paleobiology. Paleobiology. 11:105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM, Gastaldo RA. 2000. Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology. 26(S4):103–147. doi:10.1017/S0094837300026907.
   Google Scholar
• Binford LR. 1978. Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binford LR. 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrero LA. 2001. Regional taphonomy: background noise and the integrity of the archaeological record. In: Kuznar L, editor. Ethnoarchaeology of Andean South America. Contributions to Archaeological Method and Theory. Ethnoarchaeological Series 4. Ann Arbor: international Monographs in Prehistory. Indiana: Universidad de Indiana. p. 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Borrero LA. 2005. Taphonomy of Late Pleistocene faunas at Fuego-Patagonia. J S Am Earth Sci. 20(1–2):111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2005.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrero LA, Martin FM, Prevosti FJ. 2018. Taphonomy and the role of pumas (Puma concolor) in the formation of the archaeological record. Quat Int. 466:157–164. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrero LA, Martin FM, Vargas J. 2005. Tafonomía de la interacción entre pumas y guanacos en el Parque Nacional Torres del Paine, Chile. Magallania. 33(1):95–114. doi:10.4067/S0718-22442005000100007.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn HT, Kroll EM, Ambrose SH, Behrensmeyer AK, Binford LR, Blumenschine RJ, Klein RG, McHenry HM, O’Brien CJ, Wymer JJ. 1986. Systematic butchery by Plio/Pleistocene hominids at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Curr Anthropol. 27(5):431–452. doi:10.1086/203467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camino M, Cirignoli S, Varela D, Barri F, Aprile G, Periago ME, de Bustos S, Quiroga VA, Torres RM, Di Martino S. 2019. Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Buenos Aires: Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina. [accessed 2022 March 15]. http://cma.sarem.org.ar.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo L, Álvarez MC, Núñez MB, Alcaraz AP, Kaufmann CA, Gatica A, Ochoa A. ¿Potencial depredación intragremio? Puma concolor y Lycalopex gymnocercus en el ecotono Chaco-Monte. San Luis, Argentina. Notas sobre Mamíferos Sudamericanos. 3:e21.3.3.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen P, Adolfssen JS. 2005. Bite forces, canine strength and skull allometry in carnivores (Mammalia, Carnivora). J Zool. 266(2):133–151. doi:10.1017/S0952836905006643.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen BF, Kibii JM. 2015. Experimental study of bone modification by captive caracal (Caracal caracal); a model for fossil assemblage analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 62:92–104. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay LA, Yravedra J, Maté-González MA, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, Fernández-Fernández M, González-Aguilera D. 2021. The effects of prey size on carnivore tooth mark morphologies on bone; the case study of Canis lupus signatus. Hist Biol. 33(11):2760–2772. doi:10.1080/08912963.2020.1827239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelo C, Llanos R, Guerisoli MM, Varela D, Valenzuela AEJ, Pía MV, Monteverde M, Reppucci JI, Lucherini M, D’Agostino R, et al. 2019. Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Buenos Aires: Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina. [accessed 2022 March 15]. http://cma.sarem.org.ar.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney-Rivera C, Plummer TW, Hodgson JA, Forrest F, Hertel F, Oliver JS. 2009. Pits and pitfalls: taxonomic variability zand patterning in tooth mark dimensions. J Archaeol Sci. 36(11):2597–2608. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vitto LA, Petenatti EM, Nellar MM, Petenatti ME. 1994. Las áreas naturales protegidas de San Luis, Argentina. Multequina. 3:141.156.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vitto LA, Petenatti EM, Petenatti ME. 2001. Catálogo Preliminar de la Flora Vascular. Parque Nacional Sierra de las Quijadas. San Luis Argentina. Serie Técnica del Herbario UNSL. 8:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Rodrigo M. 2001. A study of carnivore competition in riparian and open habitats of modern savannas and its implications for hominid behavioral modelling. J Hum Evol. 40(2):77–98. doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domı́nguez-Rodrigo M, Piqueras A. 2003. The use of tooth pits to identify carnivore taxa in tooth-marked archaeofaunas and their relevance to reconstruct hominid carcass processing behaviours. J Archaeol Sci. 30(11):1385–1391. doi:10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00027-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donadio E, Novaro AJ, Bukirk SW, Wurstten A, Vitali MS, Monteverde MJ. 2009. Evaluating a potentially strong trophic interaction: pumas and wild camelids in protected areas of Argentina. J Zool. 280(1):33–40. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbroch LM, Kresky M, Evans J. 2012. Field guide to animal tracks and scat of California. Berkeley (CA): University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Faith JT, Behrensmeyer AK. 2006. Changing patterns of carnivore modification in the landscape bone assemblage, Amboseli Park, Kenya. J Archaeol Sci. 33(12):1718–1733. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández CS, Baldi R. 2014. Hábitos alimentarios del puma (Puma concolor) e incidencia de la depredación en la mortandad de guanacos (Lama guanicoe) en el noreste de la Patagonia. Mastozool Neotrop. 21(2):331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Jalvo Y, Andrews P. 2016. Atlas of taphonomic identifications. 1001+ images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gatica A, Denkiewicz NM, Ochoa A. 2019. Breeding behavior of mara [Dolichotis patagonum (Zimmermann, 1780)] in the Monte-Chaco ecotone of Argentina. Mammal Study. 44(4):1. doi:10.3106/ms2019-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatica A, Ochoa AC, Mangione M. 2021. Potential predators of Dolichotis patagonum inthe surroundings of its burrows, in Sierra de lasQuijadas National Park, San Luis, Argentina. Mammalia. 1–9. doi:10.1515/mammalia-2020-0194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford-González D. 2018. An introduction to zooarchaeology. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson DK. 1984. Quantitative zooarchaeology: topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guarda N, Bonacic C. 2012. . Informe Técnico Final Fondo de Investigación Científica Alto Cachapoal Ms. [accessed 2021 June 3]. https://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/transparencia/may2013/CO_117-OC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guarda NGN, Hernández F, Rubio A, Ohrens O, Bonacic C. 2009. Manual para verificar denuncias de depredación en ganado doméstico. Santiago: Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre Fauna Australis, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrrez MA, Kaufmann CA, González ME, Scheifler NA, Rafuse DJ, Massigoge A, Álvarez MC. 2016. The role of small carnivores in the movement of bones: implications for the Pampas archaeofaunal record, Argentina. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 8(2):257–276. doi:10.1007/s12520-015-0272-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Past: paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 4(1). [accessed 2022 April 12]. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes G. 1980. Evidence of carnivore gnawing on Pleistocene and recent mammalian bones. Paleobiology. 6(3):341–351. doi:10.1017/S0094837300006849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes G. 1982. Utilization and skeletal disturbances North American prey. Artic. 35(2):266–281.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett B. 2018. Taphonomic comparison of bones in mountain lion scats, coyote scats, golden eagle pellets, and great-horned owl pellets. Quat Int. 466B:141–144. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.033.
   Google Scholar
• Iriarte JA, Franklin WL, Johnson WE, Redford KH. 1990. Biogeographic variation of food habits and body size of the America puma. Oecologia. 85(2):185–190. doi:10.1007/BF00319400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2022. & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonoidis chilensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1996: e.T9007A12949680.
   Google Scholar
• Karandikar H, Serota MW, Sherman WC, Green JR, Verta G, Kremen C, Middleton AD. 2022. Dietary patterns of a versatile large carnivore, the puma (Puma concolor). Ecol Evol. 12(6):e9002. doi:10.1002/ece3.9002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlin MS. 2013. Cambio climático en zonas semiáridas: el caso Chaco Árido. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Epañola.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann CA, Rafuse DJ, González ME, Álvarez MC, Massigoge A, Scheifler NA, Gutiérrez MA. 2018. Carcass utilization and bone modifications on guanaco killed by puma in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Quat Int. 466:165–177. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein RG, Cruz-Uribe K. 1984. The Analysis of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labarca R, Prieto A, Villalobos R 2014. Taphonomy of bones contained in Puma concolor (Linnaeus) scats: its potential to interpret archaeofaunal contexts with large herbivore. In: Izeta A, editor. Poster session presented at: 12th International Council for Archaeozoology Conference: Sep 22-27; San Rafael, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• LaBarge LR, Evans MJ, Miller JRB, Cannataro G, Hunt C, Elbroch LM. 2022. Pumas Puma concolor as ecological brokers: a review of their biotic relationships. Mamm Rev. 52(3):360–376. doi:10.1111/mam.12281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloveras L, Maroto J, Soler J, Thomas R, Moreno-García M, Nadal J, Soler N. 2016. The role of small prey in human subsistence strategies from Early Upper Palaeolithic sites in Iberia: the rabbits from the Evolved Aurignacian level of Arbreda Cave. J Quat Sci. 31(5):458–471. doi:10.1002/jqs.2869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloveras L, Moreno‐García M, Nadal J. 2008. Taphonomic analysis of leporid remains obtained from modern Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) scats. Journal of Archaeological Science. 35(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloveras L, Moreno-García M, Nadal J. 2012. Feeding the foxes: an experimental study to assess their taphonomic signature on leporid remains. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 22(5):577–590. doi:10.1002/oa.1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo KD, O’connell JF. 2002. Cut and tooth mark distributions on large animal bones: ethnoarchaeological data from the Hadza and their implications for current ideas about early Human carnivory. J Archaeol Sci. 29(1):85–109. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman RL. 2018. Actualistic neotaphonomic research on bone modifying animal species: an analysis of the literature. Palaios. 33(12):542–554. doi:10.2110/palo.2018.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marean CW, Yoshiko A, Frey CJ, Randall RC. 2000. Zooarchaeological and taphonomic analysis of Die Kelders Cave 1 layers 10 and 11 Middle Stone Age larger mammal fauna. J Hum Evol. 38(1):197–233. doi:10.1006/jhev.1999.0356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin FM. 2013. Tafonomía de la transición Pleistoceno-Holoceno en Fuego-Patagonia. Interacción entre humanos y carnívoros y su importancia como agentes en la formación del registro fósil. Punta Arenas: Ediciones de la Universidad de Magallanes.
   Google Scholar
• Martin FM, Borrero LA. 1997. A Puma lair in southern Patagonia: implications for the archaeological record. Curr Anthropol. 38(3):453–461. doi:10.1086/204634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin FM, San Román M. 2010. Explorando la variabilidad del registro arqueológico y tafonómico en Pali-Aike (Chile) a través de la búsqueda de registros pleistocenos a cielo abierto. Magallania (Punta Arenas). 38(1):199–214. doi:10.4067/S0718-22442010000100012.
   Google Scholar
• Mondini NM 2003. Formación del Registro Arqueofaunístico en Abrigos Rocosos de la Puna Argentina. Tafonomía de carnívoros. Unpubished PhD Thesis. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Mondini NM. 2012. Tafonomía de carnívoros en los andes centro-sur. Madrigueras actuales y sus implicaciones para el registro arqueofaunístico. In: Acosta A, Loponte D, Mucciolo L, editors. Temas de arqueología: estudios tafonómicos y zooarqueológicos (II). Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional de Antropología yPensamiento Latinoamericano. p. 67–105.
   Google Scholar
• Mondini NM. 2018. Carnivore taphonomy in South America: a review of actualistic studies and their implications in the southern neotropics. Hist Biol. 30(6):774–785. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1319831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini NM, Muñoz AS. 2008. Pumas as taphonomic agents: a comparative analysis of actualistic studies in the Neotropics. Quat Int. 180(1):52–62. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.08.013.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo CI, Pessino M, González V. 2007. Taphonomic analysis of remains of mammals eaten by pumas (Puma concolor Carnivora, Felidae) in central Argentina. J Archaeol Sci. 34(12):2151–2160. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz AS, Mondini NM, Durán V, Gasco A. 2008. Los pumas (Puma concolor) como agentes tafonómicos. Análisis actualístico de un sitio de matanza en los Andes de Mendoza, Argentina. Geobios. 41(1):123–131. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2006.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaoka L. 2015. Differential carnivore damage as a potential indicator of resource availability and foraging efficiency. J Archaeol Method Theory. 22(3):828–856. doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9207-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasti A. 2000. Modification of vicuña carcasses in high-altitude deserts. Curr Anthropol. 41(2):279–283. doi:10.1086/300133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaro AJ, Funes MC, Walker RS. 2000. Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Patagonia. Biol Conserv. 92(1):25–33. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00065-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier M, Desclaux M, Mallye JB, Crégut-Bonnoure E. 2020. Identifying the accidental-natural mortality of leporids in the archaeoogical record: insight from a taphonomical analysis of a pitfall without evidence of human presence. J Quat Sci. 35(5):677–694. doi:10.1002/jqs.3203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessino MEM, Sarasola JH, Wander C, Besoky N. 2001. Respuesta a largo plazo del puma (Puma concolor) a una declinación poblacional de la vizcacha (Lagostomus maximus) en el desierto del Monte, Argentina. Ecol Austral. 11:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Pia MV 2011. Influencia conjunta de la vegetación, asentamientos humanos, caminos y actividades ganaderas sobre la ocurrencia y dieta de los carnívoros tope de Achala (Córdoba, Argentina). Unpublished PhD Thesis. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
   Google Scholar
• Pobiner BL. 2018. Paleoecological information in predator tooth marks. Journal of Taphonomy. 6(3–4):373–397.
   Google Scholar
• Rasband WS. 19972018. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda. Maryland: Estados Unidos. [accessed 2022 April 15]. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
   Google Scholar
• Rau JR, Tilleria MS, Martínez DR, Muñoz AH. 1991. Dieta de Felis concolor (Carnivora: Felidae) en áreas silvestres protegidas del sur de Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 64:139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripple W, Beschta R. 2006. Linking a cougar decline, trophic cascade, and catastrophic regime shift in Zion National Park. Biol Conserv. 133(4):397–408. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala N, Arsuaga JL. 2018. Regarding beasts and humans: a review of taphonomic works with living carnivores. Quat Int. 466:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasola JH, Zanón-Martínez JI, Costán AS, Ripple WJ. 2016. Hypercarnivorous apex predator could provide ecosystem services by dispersing seeds. Sci Rep. 6(1):19647. doi:10.1038/srep19647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheifler NA, Álvarez MC, Rafuse DJ, Kaufmann CA, Massigoge A, González ME, Gutiérrez MA. 2020. Taphonomic signature of Geoffroy’s cat (Leopardus geoffroyi) on small sized preys: a comparative study of ingested and non-ingested leporid bones. J Archaeol Sci. 31:102340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvaggio MM, Wilder J. 2001. Identifying the Involvement of Multiple Carnivore Taxa with Archaeological Bone Assemblages. J Archaeol Sci. 28(5):46–470. doi:10.1006/jasc.2000.0557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw HG, Beier P, Culver M, Grigione M. 2007. Puma field guide. A guide covering the biological considerations. general life history. Identification, Assessment and Management of Puma Concolor the Cougar Network. [accessed 2021 June 3]. http://www.easterncougarnet.org/Assets/pumafieldguide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Andrieux E, Clark-Wilson R, Vanwezer N, Blinkhorn J, Armitage SJ, Al Omari A, Zahrani B, Alqahtani M, Al-Shanti M, et al. 2021. Taphonomy of an excavated striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) den in Arabia: implications for paleoecology and prehistory. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 13(8):139. doi:10.1007/s12520-021-01365-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiner MC. 1991. Food procurement and transport by human and non-human predators. J Archaeol Sci. 18(4):455–482. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(91)90038-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiner MC, Munro ND, Sanz M. 2012. Carcass damage and digested bone from mountain lions (Felis concolor): implications for carcass persistence on landscapes as a function of prey age. J Archaeol Sci. 39(4):896–907. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunquist M, Sunquist F. 2002. Wild Cats of the World. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber AB, Novaro AJ, Neris N, Colman FH. 1997. The food habits of sympatric jaguar and puma in the Paraguayan Chaco. Biotropica. 29(2):204–213. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00025.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres S. 1997. Mountain lion alert. Billings (MT): Falcon Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Travaini A, Zapata S, Martínez-Peck R, Delibes M. 2000. Percepción y actitud humanas hacia la predación de ganado ovino por el zorro Colorado (Pseudalopex culpaeus) en Santa Cruz, Patagonia Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical. 7:117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Walker S, Novaro A. 2010. The world’s southernmost pumas in Patagonia and the southern Andes. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; p. 91–99.
   Google Scholar