Importance and role of neotaphonomic collections: the example of microvertebrate and experimental collection management

References

• Andrews PJ. 1990. Owls, Caves and Fossils. London (UK): The natural history Museum; p. 1–122.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews PJ. 1995. Experiments in Taphonomy. J Archaeol Sci. 22(2):147–153. doi:10.1006/jasc.1995.0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews PJ, Fernández-Jalvo Y. 2019. Understanding time in taphonomy. New York: Nova Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews PJ, Whybrow P. 2005. Taphonomic observations on a camel skeleton in a desert environment in Abu Dhabi. Pal. Electronica. 8(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armour-Chelu M, Andrews PJ. 1994. Some effects of bioturbation by earthworms (Oligochaeta) on archaeological sites. J Archaeol Sci. 21(4):433–443. doi:10.1006/jasc.1994.1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology. 4(2):150–162. doi:10.1017/S0094837300005820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Denys C, Brugal JP. 2018. What is taphonomy and what is not? Hist Biol. 30(6):718–719. doi:10.1080/08912963.2018.1432919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Pickering TR, Toth N, Schick K. 2007. Changes through time in carcass survival in the Amboseli ecosystem, southern Kenya. In: Pickering T, Shick K, Toth N, editors. Breathing Life into Fossils: taphonomic Studies in Honour of CK (Bob) Brain. Gosport (Indiana): Stone age institute press; p. 137–160.
   Google Scholar
• Berger LR, Clarke RJ. 1995. Eagle involvement in accumulation of the Taung child fauna. J Hum Evol. 29(3): 275–299. doi:10.1006/jhev.1995.1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger LR. and McGraw WS. 2007. Further evidence for eagle predation of, and feeding damage on, the Taung child. Afr J Sci. 103:496–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasco R, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Arilla M, Camarós E, Rosell J. 2014. Breaking bones to obtain marrow: a comparative study between percussion by batting bone on an anvil and hammerstone percussion. Archaeometry. 56(6):1085–1104. doi: 10.1111/arcm.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brain 1981. The Hunters or the Hunted? An introduction to cave taphonomyExperimental Taphonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs DEG. 1995 The Hunters or the Hunted? An introduction to cave taphonomyExperimental Taphonomy. PalaiosVol. 10(6):539–550.
   Google Scholar
• Bruderer C, Denys C. 1999. Inventaire taxonomique et taphonomique d’un assemblage de pelotes d’un site de nidification de T.alba de Mauritanie. Bonn Zool Beitr. 48(3–4):245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciani F. 2004. Etude des micromammifères proies dans les pelotes de régurgitation de rapaces nocturnes d’Afrique tropicale. Interêts biogéographique et taphonomique. Thèse Dr vétérinaire. Ecole Veterinaire Maisons Alfort; p. 1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cáceres I, Bravo P, Esteban M, Expósito I, Saladié P. 2002. Fresh and heated bones breakage. An experimental approach. In: De Renzi M, Pardo M, Belinchón M, E P, Montoya P, A M-A, editors. Current topics on taphonomy and fossilization. Valencia: Ayuntamiento de Valencia; p. 471–479.
   Google Scholar
• Campmas E, Stoetzel E, Denys C. 2018. African carnivores as taphonomic agents: contribution of modern coprogenic sample analysis to their identification. Int J Osteoarcheol. 28(3):237–263. doi:10.1002/oa.2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1881. The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms. London, John Muray.
   Google Scholar
• Dauphin Y, Castillo-Michel H, Farre B, Mataame A, Rbii K, Rihane A, Stoetzel E, Denys C. 2015. Identifying predation on rodent teeth through structure and composition at micrometric scale: a Case from Morocco. Micron. 75:34–44. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2015.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs DEG. and McMahon S. 2016. The role of experiments in investigating the taphonomy of exceptional preservation. Palaeontol. 59:1–11. doi:10.1111/pala.12219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Los Reyes Pi M, Gutiérrez A, Macho-Callejo A, García-Morato S, Moreno-García M, Fernández-Jalvo Y. submitted. LET’S PLAY WITH FIRE! Preliminary study of thermo-alterations on boiled, buried and burnt bone. Hist Biol this issue
   Google Scholar
• Denys C. 1985. Nouveaux critères de reconnaissance des concentrations de microvertébrés d’après l’étude des pelotes de chouette du Botswana (Afrique australe). Bull Mus Nat. Hist. Nat., Paris, Section A (Zool.). 7(4):879–933.
   Google Scholar
• Denys C. 2002. Taphonomy and experimentation. Archaeometry. 44(3):469–484. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00079.
   Google Scholar
• Denys C. 2017. Accumulations de rapaces nocturnes et diurnes. In: Brugal JP, editor. TaphonomieS. Collection « Sciences Archéologiques. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines; p. 347–367.
   Google Scholar
• Denys C, Canet C, Cuisin J, Pharisat A. 2004. Diversité des petits mammifères et prédation: l’importance des études néotaphonomiques pour la reconstruction paléoécologique des sites plio-pléistocènes, le cas d’Etrabonne (Jura, France). Miscelanea en homenaje a Emiliano Aguirre. Paleontologia. 2:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Denys C, Stoetzel E, Campmas E, Denys C, Taylor PJ. 2023, in press. Revue bibliographique des travaux des dix dernières années en taxonomie et taphonomie des petits vertébrés en Afrique du Nord-Ouest. Paleo Hors-Série, Colloque hommage à Émilie Campmas (1983-2019). Sociétés humaines et environnements dans la zone circumméditérranéenne du Pléistocène au début de l’Holocène. 13: 1 . doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32498-4.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson P, Wexlar D. 1979. Taphonomic investigations of owl pellets. Paleobiology. 5(3):275–284. doi:10.1017/S0094837300006564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Rodrigo M. 1997. Meat-eating by early hominids at the FLK 22Zinjanthropussite, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): an experimental approach using cut-mark data. J. Human Evol. 33(6):669–690. doi:10.1006/jhev.1997.0161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Rodrigo M, Fernandez-Lopez S, Alcala L. 2011. How can taphonomy be defined in the XXI Century? J Taphon. 9:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Organista E, Baquedano E, Cifuentes-Alcobendas G, Pizarro-Monzo M, Vegara-Riquelme M, Gidna A, Uribelarrea D, Martín-Perea D. 2022. Neotaphonomic analysis of the Misiam leopard lair from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): understanding leopard–hyena interactions in open settings. R Soc Open Sci. 9(7):220252. doi:10.1098/rsos.220252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efremov IA. 1940. Taphonomy: new branch of paleontology. Pan-Am Geol. 74:81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Escribano N, Galicia D, Ariño AH, Escala C. 2016. Long-term data set of small mammals from owl pellets in the Atlantic-Mediterranean transition area. Sci Data. 3(1):160085. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Andrews PJ. 2003. Experimental effects of water abrasion on bone fragments. J Taphon. 1:147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Andrews PJ. 2016. Atlas of Taphonomic identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Andrews P, Denys C, Sese C, Stoetzel E, Marin Monfort D, Pequero D. 2016. Taphonomy for taxonomists, implications in small mammal studies. Quat Sci Rev. 139:138–157. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Marin-Monfort MD. 2008. Experimental taphonomy in museums: preparation protocols for skeletons and fossil vertebrates under the scanning electron microscopy. Geobios. 41(1):157–181. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2006.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Rueda L, Fernández FJ, García-Morato S, Marin-Monfort MD, Montalvo CI, Tomassini R, Chazan M, Horwitz LK, Andrews PJ. 2022. Understanding the Impact of Trampling on Rodent Bones. Quaternary. 5(1):11. doi:10.3390/quat5010011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández FJ, Montalvo CI. 2017. Actualistic taphonomy of small mammals from owl pellets in South America and its archaeological implication. Global J Archaeol Anthropol. 2:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Fosse P, Selva N, Smietana W, Okarma H, Wajrak A, Fourvel JB, Madelaine S, Esteban-Nadal M, Cáceres I, Yravedra J, et al. 2012. Bone modification by modern wolf (Canis lupus): a taphonomic study from their natural feeding places. J Taphonomy. 10(3–4):197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Fourvel JB, Fosse P, Brugal JP, Cregut-Bonnoure E, Slimak L, Tournepiche JF. 2014. Characterization of bear remains consumption by Pleistocene large carnivores (Felidae, Hyaenidae, Canidae). Quat Internat. 339-340:232–244. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäb F, Ballhaus C, Stinnesbeck E, Kral AG, Janssen K, Bierbaum G. 2020. Experimental taphonomy of fish - role of elevated pressure, salinity and pH. Sci Rep. 10(1):7839. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64651-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehler A, Tütken T, Pack A, Farke AA, Farke AA. 2012. Oxygen and carbon isotope variations in a modern rodent community – implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. PLoS One. 7(11):e49531. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glue DE. 1967. Prey taken by the barn owl in England and Wales. Bird Study. 14(1):169–183. doi:10.1080/00063656709476160.
   Google Scholar
• Glue DE. 1974. Food of the barn owl in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study. 21(3):200–210. doi:10.1080/00063657409476419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes S, Fernandez-Jalvo Y, Stoetzel E, Gorgé O, Bennett EA, Denys C, Grange T, Geigl E-M. 2016. Owl pellets: a wise DNA source for small mammals genetics. J Zool. 298(1):64–74. doi:10.1111/jzo.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A. 2021. Estudio de los efectos tafonómicos observados en los restos cadavéricos de. Sus scrofa domestica [PhD dissertation]. Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/673327.
   Google Scholar
• Iniesto M, Lopez-Archilla ABI, Fregenal-Martínez M, Buscalioni AD, Guerrero MC. 2013. Involvement of microbial mats in delayed decay: an experimental essay on fish preservation. Palaios. 28(1):56–66. doi:10.2110/palo.2011.p11-099r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey A, Denys C, Stoetzel E, Lee Thorp J. 2015. Influences on the stable oxygen and carbon isotopes in gerbillid rodent teeth in semi-arid and arid environments: implications for past climate and environmental reconstruction. Earth Plan Sci Letters. 428:84–96. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korth WW. 1979. Taphonomy of microvertebrate fossil assemblages. Ann Carnegie Mus. 48(1):235–285. doi:10.5962/p.330830.
   Google Scholar
• Lebreton L, Bailon S, Guillaud E, Testu A, Perrenoud C. 2020. Multi-taxa referential of a modern Eurasian Eagle-Owl (Bubo bubo) aerie. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 32:102417. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102417.
   Google Scholar
• Lev M, Weinstein-Evron M, Yeshurun R. 2020. Squamate bone taphonomy: a new experimental framework and its application to the Natufian zooarchaeological record. Sci Rep. 10(1):9373. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66301-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linchamps P, Stoetzel E, Hanon R, Denys C. 2021. Neotaphonomic study of two Tyto alba assemblages from Botswana: palaeoecological implications. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 38:103085. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103085.
   Google Scholar
• Lloveras L, Thomas R, Cosso A, Pinyol C, Nadal J. 2018. When wildcats feed on rabbits: an experimental study to understand the taphonomic signature of European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris). Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 10(2):449–464. doi:10.1007/s12520-016-0364-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloveras L, Thomas R, Lourenço R, Caro J, Dias A. 2014. Understanding the taphonomic signature of Bonelli’s Eagle (Aquila fasciata). J Archageo Sci. 49:455–471. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann RW, Koel-Abt K, Dhody A, Mahakkanukrauh P, Mann VJ, Techataweewan N, DeFreytas JR, Ruengdit S. 2021. The importance of human osteological collections: our past, present, and future. Forensic Sci Int. 325:110895. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Monfort MD, García-Morato S, Andrews PJ, Avery DM, Chazan M, Horwitz LK, Fernandez-Jalvo Y. 2022. The owl that never left! Taphonomy of earlier stone age small mammal assemblages from wonderwerk cave (South Africa). Quat Intern. 614:111–125. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2021.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo-Lomba P, Fernández-Marchena JL, Ollé A, Cáceres I. 2020. Knapped bones used as tools: experimental approach on different activities. Quat Intern. 569-570:51–65. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2020.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew DF. 1977. Avian predators as accumulators of fossil mammal material. Boreas. 6(1):25–31. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3885.1977.tb00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo CI, Fernández FJ. 2019. Review of the actualistic taphonomy of small mammals ingested by South American predators Its importance in the interpretation of the fossil record. Publ Electron Asoc Paleontol Argent. 19(1):18–46. doi:10.5710/PEAPA.11.03.2019.275.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda A, Courtenay LA, Téllez E, Yravedra J. 2023. An experimental approach to the analysis of altered cut marks in archaeological contexts from Geometrics Morphometrics. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 48:103850.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto Llona AC, Andrews PJ. 1999. Amphibian taphonomy and its application to the fossil record of Dolina (middle Pleistocene, Atapuerca, Spain). Pal Pal Pal. 149(1–4):411–429. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00215-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidsma FH. 2022. Laboratory based experimental research into the effect of diagenesis on heated bone - implications and improved tools for the characterisation of ancient fire. Sci Rep. 12(1):17544. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21622-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey-Rodríguez I, Stoetzel E, López-García JM, Denys C. 2019. Implications of modern Barn owls pellets analysis for archaeological studies in the Middle East. J Archaeol Sci. 111:105029. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2019.105029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer A, Montuire S, Gilg O, Laroulandie V. 2019. A taphonomic investigation of small vertebrate accumulations produced by the snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus) and its implications for fossil studies. Pal Pal Pal. 514:189–205. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozada L, Allain R, Tournepiche JF. 2018. Trampling experiments on bones in fine and soft sediments. Quaternaire. 29(1):39–44. doi:10.4000/quaternaire.8593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souttou K, Manaa A, Stoetzel E, Sekour M, Hamani A, Doumandji S, Denys C. 2012. Small mammal bone modifications in Black Shouldred Kite Elanus caeruleus pellets from Algeria: implications for archaeological sites J Taphonomy. 10(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stiner MC. 1991. Food procurement and transport by human and non-human predators. J Archaeol Sci 18(455–482):4. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(91)90038-Q.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND. 2004. The value of museum collections for research and society. Bio Sci. 54(1):66–74. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0066:TVOMCF]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udoni MM. 2021. Experimental study of black bear (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bear (U. arctos) tooth marks and other gnawing damage on bone. Forensic Anthrop. 4(2):71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Webster JA. 1973. Seasonal variation in mammal contents of barn owl castings. Bird Study. 20(3):185–196. doi:10.1080/00063657309476380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar