Joint disassociation pattern from a taphonomical and anthropological point of view

References

• Alfsdotter C, Veltri MF, Crabb CL, Wescott DJ. 2021. An actualistic taphonomic study of human decomposition in coffins. Bioarchaeol Int. 6(3):190–215. doi:10.5744/bi.2022.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Berryman HE, Bass WM, Symes SA, Smith OC. 1991. Recognition of cemetery remains in the forensic setting. J Forensic Sci. 36(1):230–237. doi:10.1520/JFS13023J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouquin D, Beauthier JP, Depierre G 2013. The dead do not dress: contribution of forensic anthropology experiments to burial practices analysis. International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies; Vienna. http://www.chnt.at/proceedings-chnt-17/.
   Google Scholar
• Breitmeier D, Graefe-Kirci U, Albrecht K, Weber M, Tröger HD, Kleemann WJ. 2005. Evaluation of the correlation between time corpse spent in in-ground graves and findings at exhumation forensic science international. Forensic Sci Int. 154(2–3):218–223. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambra O 2006. Bioestratinomía y Fosildiagénesis de Arcosaurios. Aplicación de la Actuotafonomía al estudio de la influencia paleobiológica en el proceso tafonómico. [ PhD dissertation]. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/2645.
   Google Scholar
• Cockle DL. 2013. human decomposition and the factors that affect it: a retrospective study of death scenes in Canada. PhD dissertation in the Department of Archaeology Faculty of Environment. Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Cockle DL, Bell SL. 2015. Human decomposition and the reliability of a “Universal” model for post mortem interval estimations. Forensic Sci Int. 253:136.e1–136.e9. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duday H. 2009. The archaeology of the death lectures in archaeothanatology. UK: Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Duday H, Courtaud P, Crubezy E, Sellier P, Tillier AM. 1990. L’anthropologie de “terrain”: reconnaissance et interpretation des gestes funeraires. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris. 2:26–49.
   Google Scholar
• Duday H, Guillon M. 2006. Understanding the circumstances of decomposition when the body is skeletonized. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and medicine: complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (New Jersey): Humana Press Inc; p. 117–157.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Andrews P. 2016. Atlas of taphonomic identifications: 1001+ Images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification. UK: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7432-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT. 2012. Para lá da morte: Estudo tafonómico da decomposição cadavérica e da degradação óssea e implicações na estimativa do intervalo pós-morte. [ PhD dissertation]. Portugal; Universidade de Coimbra.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT, Cunha E. 2013. Can we infer post mortem interval on the basis of decomposition rate? A case from a Portuguese cemetery. Forensic Sci Int. 226(1–3):e298.1–e298.6. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler S, Graw M. 2003. Decomposition of buried corpses, with special reference to the formation of adipocere. Die Naturwissenschaften. 90(7):291–300. doi:10.1007/s00114-003-0437-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuna M 2022. Descomposición y determinación del intervalo post mortem en cuerpos exhumados de fosas comunes: estudio tafonómico forense de una serie de casos. [ PhD dissertation]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway A. 1997. The process of decomposition: a model from the Arizona-Sonoran Desert. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press; p. 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones AM, Henry TE, Parks BO. 1989. Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. Journal of Forensic Science. 34(3):607–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A 2021. Estudio de los efectos tafonómicos observados en los restos cadavéricos de Sus scrofa domestica. [ PhD dissertation]. Spain Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/673327
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A, Nociarová D, Malgosa A, Armentano N. 2016. Comparación de los Efectos Tafonómicos Observados en dos Estructuras Funerarias de Espacio Vacío. Revista Española de Medicina Legal. 42(3):98–104. doi:10.1016/j.reml.2016.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A, Nociarová D, Malgosa A, Armentano N. 2017. Taphos-m, a taphonomical experiment using Sus scrofa domestica model in an experimental facility. Archaeological and Environmental Forensic Science. 1(1):33–48. doi:10.1558/aefs.32473.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD, Sorg MH. 2002. Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janaway RC, Percival SL, Wilson AS. 2009. Decomposition of human remains. In: Percival SL, editor. Microbiology and Aging. USA: Springer; p. 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Mickleburgh HL. 2018. Actualistic experimental taphonomy on inhumation burial. In: Barone PM, W.J, editors. Multidisciplinary approaches to forensic archaeology: topics discussed during the european meetings on forensic archaeology (EMFA). Cham (Switzerland): Mike Groen, Springer International Publishing; p. 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Mickleburgh HL, Wescott DJ. 2018. Controlled experimental observations on joint disarticulation and bone displacement of a human body in an open pit: implications for funerary archaeology. J Archaeol Sci. 20:158–167. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nociarová D 2016. Taphonomic and Anthropological Analysis of Unclaimed Human Remains from Cemetery Context in Barcelona. [ PhD Dissertation]. Spain: Autonomous University of Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/393919
   Google Scholar
• Nociarová D, Adserias MJ, Armentano N, Galtés I, Malgosa A. 2014a. Exhumaciones de los Restos Humanos no Reclamados Como Modelo Tafonómico. Revista Española de Medicina Legal. 2:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.reml.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Nociarová D, Adserias MJ, Malgosa A, Galtés I. 2014b. Where do those remains come from? Forensic Sci Int. 245:18–24. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roksandic M. 2002. Position of skeletal remains as a key to understanding mortuary behavior. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Advance in Forensic Taphonomy. Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press; p. 122–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, van de Voorde W. 2017. Concealing the crime: the effects of chemicals on human tissues. In: Schotsmans EMJ, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes SL, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley; p. 335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Spies ML, Finaughty DA, Friedling LJ, Gibbon VE. 2020. The effect of clothing on decomposition and vertebrate scavengers in cooler months of the temperate southwestern Cape, South Africa. Forensic Sci Int. 309. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueland M, Forbes S, Stuart B. 2018. Seasonal variation of fatty acid profiles from textiles associated with decomposing pig remains in a temperate Australian environment. Forensic Chem. 11. doi:10.1016/j.forc.2018.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanin S, Huchet JB. 2017. Forensic entomology and funerary Archaeoentomology. In: Schotsmans EMJ, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes SL, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley; p. 67–186.
   Google Scholar