What does lime tell us about cadaveric remains?

References

• Alfsdotter C, Veltri MF, Crabb CL, Wescott DJ. 2022. An actualistic taphonomic study of human decomposition in coffins. Bioarchae Int. 6(3):190–215. doi: 10.5744/bi.2022.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Armentano N, Jordana X, Malgosa A. 2014. Estudio tafonómico e interpretación del gesto funerario de los restos óseos de la Cova de Montanissell (Alt Urgell, Lleida). Trab Prehist. 71(1):156–172. doi: 10.3989/tp.2014.12130.
   Google Scholar
• Armentano N, Nociarová D, Malgosa A. 2012. Taphos-m: taphonomical and anthropological project: human osteobiography using Sus scrofa domestica model. Revista Funeraria. 109:58–59.
   Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information on bone weathering. Paleobiology. 4(2):150–162. doi: 10.1017/S0094837300005820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán de Heredia J, Gibrat I. 2014. El primer testimoni arqueològic de la pesta negra a Barcelona: fossa comuna de a Basílica dels Sants màrtirs Just i Pastor. Quarhis época II. 10:164–179.
   Google Scholar
• Botella MC, Alemán I, Jiménez SA. 2010. Los huesos humanos: manipulación y alteraciones. Spain: Edicions Bellatera.
   Google Scholar
• Botella MC, Alemán I, Jiménez SA. 2010. Los huesos humanos: manipulación y alteraciones. Barcelona, España: Edicions Bellaterra.
   Google Scholar
• Castex D, Blaizot F. 2017. Reconstructing the original arrangement, organization and architecture of burials in archaeology. In: Schotsmans E, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes S, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley; p. 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• David R. 2008. Egyptian mummies and modern science. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duday H. 1990. Observations ostéologiques et décomposition du cadavre: sepulture colmatée ou en espace vide. Rev Archéologique Cent France. 29(2):193–196. doi: 10.3406/racf.1990.2634.
   Google Scholar
• Duday H, Courtaud P, Crubezy E, Sellier P, Tillier AM. 1990. L’Anthropologie “de terrain”: reconnaissance et interprétation des gestes funéraires. Bull Mémorial Soc d’Anthropologie Paris. 2(3):29–50. doi: 10.3406/bmsap.1990.1740.
   Google Scholar
• Etxeberria F, Serrulla F, Herrasti L. 2014. Simas, cavernas y pozos para ocultar cadáveres en la Guerra Civil española (1936-1939). Aportaciones desde la Antropología Forense. Munibe Antropol Arkeol. 65:269–288. doi: 10.21630/maa.2014.65.16.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jalvo Y, Andrews P. 2016. Atlas of taphonomic identifications: 1001+ images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification. UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT, Cunha E. 2013. Can we infer post mortem interval on the basis of decomposition rate? A case from a Portuguese cemetery. Forensic Sci Int. 226(1–3):298.e1–298.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Stuart BH, Dent BB. 2005. The effect of the burial environment on adipocere formation. Forensic Sci Int. 154(1):24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisbert-Calabuig JA. 2004. Medicina Legal y Toxicología. Spain: Ediciones Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero VM, Ensenyat JA, Calvo M, Orvay J. 2005. El abrigo rocoso de Son Gallard – Son Marroig. Nuevas aportaciones treinta y siete años después. Mayurqa. 30:79–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A. 2021. Estudio de los efectos tafonómicos observados en los restos cadavéricos de Sus scrofa domestica [ PhD dissertation]. Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/673327.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A, Guàrdia L, Nociarová D, Malgosa A, Armentano N. 2021. Taphonomy of experimental burials in taphos-m: the role of fungi. Rev Iberoam Micol. 38(3):125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2021.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez A, Nociarová D, Malgosa A, Armentano N. 2017. Taphos-m, a taphonomical research using Sus scrofa domestica model in an experimental facility. Archaeol Environ Forensic Sci. 1(1):33–48. doi: 10.1558/aefs.32473.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD, Sorg MH. 2002. Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory, and archaeological perspectives. United States: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill A. 1979. Disarticulation and scattering of mammal skeletons. Paleobiology. 5(3):261–274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2400259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill A, Behrensmeyer AK. 1984. Disarticulation patterns of East African ungulates. Paleobiology. 10(3):366–376. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2400606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janaway RC, Percival SL, Wilson AS. 2009. Decomposition of human remains. In: Percival S, editor. Microbiology and aging. United States: Springer; p. 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Junkins EN, Carter DO. 2017. Relationship between human remains, graves and the depositional environment. In: Schotsmans E, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes S, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley; p. 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kacki S, Castex D. 2012. Réflexions sur la variété des modalités funéraires en temps d’épidémie. L’exemple de la Peste noire en contextes urbain et rural. Archeologie médiévale. 42(42):1–21. doi: 10.4000/archeomed.10364.
   Google Scholar
• Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadows L. 1990. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci. 35(1):103–111. doi: 10.1520/JFS12806J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuszewski S, Hall MJR, Moreau G, Schoenly KG, Tarone AM, Villet MH. 2020. Pigs vs people: the use of pigs as analogues for humans in forensic entomology and taphonomy research. Int J Leg Med. 134(2):793–810. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02074-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles KL, Finaughty DA, Gibbon VE. 2020. A review of experimental design in forensic taphonomy: moving towards forensic realism. Forensics Sci Res. 5(4):249–259. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1792631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munsell Soil Colour Charts. 1994. Macbeth division of kollinorgen instruments corporation. New Windsor, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Nociarová D. 2016. Taphonomical and Anthropological analysis of unclaimed human remains from cemetery context in Barcelona [ PhD dissertation]. Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/393919.
   Google Scholar
• Nociarová D, Gutiérrez A, Armentano N, Ibáñez-Gimeno P, Galtés I, Malgosa A. 2023. Joint disassociation pattern from a taphonomical and anthropological point of view. Hist Biol. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2023.2230579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JA. 1965. A summer carrion study of the baby pig sus scrofa Linnaeus. Ecology. 46(5):592–602. doi: 10.2307/1934999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault KA, Forbes SL. 2016. Elemental analysis of soil and vegetation surrounding decomposing human analogues. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 49(3):138–151. doi: 10.1080/00085030.2016.1184840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokines JT. 2016. Taphonomic alterations to terrestrial surface-deposited human osseous remains in a New England environment. J Forensic Identif. 66(1):59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock CR, Pokines JT, Bethard JD. 2018. Organic staining on bone from exposure to wood and other plant materials. F Science Int. 283:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto JL, Magaña C, Ubelaker DH. 2004. Interpretation of post mortem change in cadavers in Spain. J Forensic Sci. 49(5):1–6. doi: 10.1520/JFS2003337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reverte-Coma JM. 1991. Antropología Forense. Spain: Ministerio de Justicia.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez WC, Bass WM. 1983. Insect activity and its relationship to decay rates of human cadavers in East Tennessee. J Forensic Sci. 28(2):423–432. doi: 10.1520/JFS11524J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez WC, Bass WM. 1985. Decomposition of buries bodies and methods that may aid in their location. J Forensic Sci. 30(3):836–852. doi: 10.1520/JFS11017J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers CJ 2010. Dating death: forensic taphonomy and the post mortem interval [ PhD dissertation]. UK: University of Wolverhampton.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers TL. 2005. Recognition of cemetery remains in a forensic context. J Forensic Sci. 50(1):5–11. doi: 10.1520/JFS2003389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenly KG, Haskell NH, Mills DK, Bieme-Ndi C, Larsen K, Lee Y. 2006. Recreating death’s acre in the school yard: using pig carcasses as model corpses to teach concepts of forensic entomology and ecological succession. Am Biol Teach. 68(7):402–410. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[402:RDAITS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ. 2013. The effects of the lime on the decomposition of buried human remains: a field and laboratory-based study for forensic and archaeological application [ PhD dissertation]. UK: University of Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Denton J, Dekeirsschieter J, Ivaneanu T, Leentjes S, Janaway RC, Wilson AS. 2012. Effects of hydrated lime and quicklime on the decay of buried human remains using pig cadavers as human body analogues. Forensic Sci Int. 217(1–3):50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Denton J, Fletcher JN, Janaway RC, Wilson AS. 2014a. Short-term effects of hydrated lime and quicklime on the decay of human remains using pig cadavers as human body analogues: laboratory experiments. Forensic Sci Int. 238:142.e1–142.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Fletcher JN, Denton J, Janaway RC, Wilson AS. 2014b. Long-term effects of hydrated lime and quicklime on the decay of human remains using pig cadavers as human body analogues: field experiments. Forensic Sci Int. 238:141.e1–141.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, García-Rubio A, Edwards HGM, Munshi T, Wilson AS, Ríos L. 2016. Analysing and interpreting lime burials from the Spanish civil war (1936-1939): a case study from La carcavilla cemetery. J Forensic Sci. 62(2):498–510. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes SL. 2017a. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Toksoy-Köksal F, Brettell RC, Bessou M, Corbineau R, Lingle AM, Bouquin D, Blanchard P, Becker K, Castex D, et al. 2019. Not all that is white is lime, white substances from archaeological burial contexts: analyses and interpretations. Archaeometry. 61(4):1–19. doi: 10.1111/arcm.12453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, van de Vijver K, Wilson AS, Castex D. 2015. Interpreting lime burials: a discussion in light of lime burial at St. Rombout’s cemetery in Mechelen, Belgium (10th-18th centuries). J Archaeol Sci Rep. 3:464–479. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, van de Voorde W. 2017. Concealing the crime: the effects of chemicals on human tissues. In: Schotsmans E, Márquez-Grant N, Forbes S, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. UK: Wiley; p. 335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsmans EMJ, Wessling R, McClue WA, Wilson AS, Edwards HGM, Denton J. 2020. Histology and Raman spectroscopy of limed human remains from the Rwandan genocide. J Forensic Leg Med. 70:101895. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thew H. 2000. Effects of lime on the decomposition rate of buried remains [ Master degree]. United States: University of Indianapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Tibbett M, Carter DO. 2008. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy. Chemical and biological effects of buried human remain. United States: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Strydonck M, Decq L, van den Brande T, Boudin M, Ramis D, Borms H, de Mulder G. 2013. The protohistoric ‘quicklime burials’ from the Balearic Islands: cremation or in humation. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 25(4):392–400. doi: 10.1002/oa.2307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucha JM, Pokines JT, Bartelink E. 2017. A comparative taphonomic analysis of 24 trophy skulls from modern forensic cases. J Forensic Sci. 62(5):1266–1277. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar