Body size evolution of the Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous bivalves of Kutch, India

References

• Ahmad AHM, Majid A. 2010. Genesis and diagenetic evolution of Habo Formation, Kachchh, Gujarat. J Geol Soc India. 76:331–344. doi:10.1007/s12594-010-0104-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti M, Fürsich FT, Pandey DK. 2019. Sedimentology of a prograding delta complex: the Jurassic succession of the Wagad Uplift in the Kachchh Basin, western India. N Jb Geol und Paläonto, Abh. 292(1):1–24. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2019/0805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alroy J. 1998. Cope’s Rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Sci. 280(5364):731–734. doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold AJ, Kelly DC, Parker WC. 1995. Causality and Cope’s Rule: evidence from the planktonic foraminifera. J Paleontol. 69(2):203–210. doi:10.1017/S0022336000034557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson JW, Wignall PB, Morton JD, Aze T, Hautmann M. 2019. Body size changes in bivalves of the family Limidae in the aftermath of the end-Triassic mass extinction: the Brobdingnag effect. Palaeontology. 62(4):561–582. doi:10.1111/pala.12415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker J, Meade A, Pagel M, Venditti C. 2015. Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112(16):5093–5098. doi:10.1073/pnas.1419823112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambach RK. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology. 19(3):372–397. doi:10.1017/S0094837300000336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan S, Shome S, Bose PK, Ghosh G. 1989. Faunal crisis and marine regression across the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary in Kutch, India. Mesozoic Research. 2(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan S, Shome S, Roy P. 2007. Biogeography of Kutch ammonites during the latest Jurassic (Tithonian) and a global paleobiogeographic overview. In: Landman N, Davis R Mapes R, editors. Cephalopods Present Past New Insights Fresh Perspect. Springer; p. 375–395. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6806-5_17.
   Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM. 1985. Taphonomy’s contributions to paleobiology. Paleobiology. 11:105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM, Gastaldo RA. 2000. Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleontol Soc Pap. 2(sp4):103–147. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[103:TAP]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Bell MA, Braddy S. 2012. Cope’s Rule in the Ordovician trilobite family Asaphidae (order Asaphida): patterns across multiple most parsimonious trees. Hist Biol. 24:223–230. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2011.616201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 1971. Notes on the geology of Kutch. Q J Geol Min. Metall. Soc. India. 43:223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 1980. Mesozoic rock stratigraphy of Kachchh. Q J Min. Metall. Soc. India. 49:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 1987. Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics. 135(4):307–327. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(87)90115-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 1991. Stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of the Mesozoic basin of Kutch, western India. In: Tandon S, Pant C, and Casshyap S, editors. Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Evolution of Western India. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. p. 74–103.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 2005. Tectonic style and sediment dynamics of rifted basins, their bearing on petroleum habitat-examples from Satpura and Kutch basins, India. Indian J Pet Geol. 14:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas SK. 2016. Mesozoic and Tertiary stratigraphy of Kutch (Kachchh) A review. In: Thakkar M, editor. Recent Studies on the Geology of Kachchh. New Delhi India: Geological Society Special Publication; p. 6:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner JT. 1988. The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection. New Jersy: PrincetonPrinceton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner JT. 2006. Why Size Matters: from Bacteria to Blue Whales. New Jersy: PrincetonPrinceton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Maurer BA. 1986. Body size, ecological dominance, and Cope’s Rule. Nat. 324(6094):248–250. doi:10.1038/324248a0.
   Google Scholar
• Butler RJ, Goswami A. 2008. Body size evolution in Mesozoic birds: little evidence for Cope’s Rule. J Evol Biol. 21(6):1673–1682. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01594.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder WA. 1984. Size, Function, and Life History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; p. 431.
   Google Scholar
• Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielby J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, Orme CDL, Purvis A. 2005. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Sci. 309(5738):1239–1241. doi:10.1126/science.1116030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Song H, He W, Tong J, Wang F, Wu S. 2018. Size variation of brachiopods from the Late Permian through the Middle Triassic in south China: evidence for the Lilliput effect following the Permian-Triassic extinction. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 519:248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope ED. 1887. The Origin of the Fittest. New York. USA: Appleton and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cox LR. 1940. The Jurassic lamellibranch fauna of Kuchh (Cutch): Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica. Series. 3(3):1–157.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton JS, Cooper RA, Beu AG, Foote M, Marshall BA. 2010. Biotic influences on species duration: interactions between traits in marine molluscs. Paleobiology. 36(2):204–223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40792286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton JS, Maxwell PA. 2000. Size: All it’s shaped up to be? Evolution of shape through the lifespan of the Cenozoic bivalve Spissatella (Crassatellidae). Geol Soc London Spec Publ. 177(1):399–423. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.177.01.27.
   Google Scholar
• Depéret CJ. 1909. The Transformations of the Animal World. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Alberti M, Pandey DK. 2013. Stratigraphy and palaeoenvironments of the Jurassic rocks of Kachchh—Field Guide: beringeria. Vol. 7. pp. 1–174.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Alberti M, Pandey DK. 2021. Palaeoecological analysis of maximum flooding zones from the Tithonian (Upper Jurassic) of the Kachchh Basin, western India. Facies. 67(7):1–27. doi:10.1007/s10347-020-00617-6.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Heinze M, Jaitly AK. 2000. Contributions to the Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. VIII. The bivalve fauna. Part IV. Subclass Heterodonta. Beringeria. 27:63–140.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Oschmann W. 1993. Shell beds as tools in basin analysis: the Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. J Geol Soc London. 150(1):169–185. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.150.1.0169.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Oschmann W, Jaitly AK. 1992. Hardgrounds, reworked concretion levels and condensed horizons in the Jurassic of western India: their significance for basin analysis. J Geol Soc. 149(3):313–331. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.3.0313.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Oschmann W, Jaitly AK, Singh IB. 1991. Faunal response to transgressive-regressive cycles: examples from the Jurassic of Western India. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 85(3–4):149–159. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(91)90155-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Pandey DK. 2003. Sequence stratigraphic significance of sedimentary cycles and shell concentrations in the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous of Kachchh, western India. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 193(2):285–309. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00233-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Pandey DK, Alberti M, Mukherjee D, Chauhan G. 2020. Stratigraphic architecture and palaeoenvironments in the Kachchh rift Basin during the Jurassic. 36th International Geological Congress-Field Trip Guide WR010. 43:1–146.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Pandey DK, Callomon JH, Jaitly AK, Singh IB. 2001. Marker beds in the Jurassic of the Kachchh Basin, Western India: their depositional environment and sequence stratigraphic significance. J Palaeontol Soc India. 46:173–198.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Pandey DK, Oschmann W, Jaitly AK, Singh IB. 1994. Ecology and adaptive strategies of corals in unfavourable environments: Examples from the Middle Jurassic of the Kachchh Basin, Western India. N Jb Geol und Paläonto, Abh. 194(2–3):269–303. doi:10.1127/njgpa/194/1994/269.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich FT, Singh IB, Joachimski M, Krumm S, Schlirf M, Schlirf S. 2005. Palaeoclimate reconstructions of the Middle Jurassic of Kachchh (western India): an integrated approach based on palaeoecological, oxygen isotopic, and clay mineralogical data. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 217(3–4):289–309. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich PD. 1980. Evolutionary patterns in early Cenozoic mammals. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 8(1):407–424. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.08.050180.002203.
   Google Scholar
• Gombos AM, Powell WG, Norton IO. 1995. The tectonic evolution of western India and its impacts on hydrocarbon occurrence: an overview. Sediment Geol. 96(1–2):119–129. doi:10.1016/0037-0738(94)00129-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotanda KM, Correa C, Turcotte MM, Rolshausen G, Hendry AP. 2015. Linking macrotrends and microrates: re-evaluating microevolutionary support for Cope’s Rule. Evol. 69(5):1345–1354. doi:10.1111/evo.12653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould SJ. 1988. Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. J Paleontol. 62(3):319–329. doi:10.1017/S0022336000059126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould SJ. 1997. Cope’s rule as psychological artefact. Nature. 385(6613):199–200. doi:10.1038/385199a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould GC, MacFadden BJ. 2004. Gigantism, Dwarfism, and Cope’s Rule: “Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense without a Phylogeny. Bull Am Museum Nat Hist. 285:219–237. doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2004)285<0219:c>2.0.co;2.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam A. 1986. The Pliensbachian and Tithonian extinction events. Nature. 319(6056):765–768. doi:10.1038/319765a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen TF, Martins EP. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution. 50(4):1404–1417. doi:10.2307/2410878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnik PG. 2011. Direct and indirect effects of biological factors on extinction risk in fossil bivalves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108(33):13594–13599. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100572108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim NA, Knope ML, Schaal EK, Wang SC, Payne JL. 2015. Cope’s Rule in the evolution of marine animals. Sci. 347(6224):867–871. doi:10.1126/science.1260065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman CS. 2003. Evidence for abrupt Eocene-Oligocene molluscan faunal changes in the Pacific Northwest. In: Prothero, editor. From Greenhouse to Icehouse: The marine Eocene-Oligocene transition. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Benton MJ. 2005. The evolution of large size: how does Cope’s Rule work? Trends Ecol Evol. 20(1):4–6. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone DWE, Keesey TM, Pisani D, Purvis A. 2005. Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope’s Rule. J Evol Biol. 18:587–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00870.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G. 2006. Fitting and comparing models of phyletic evolution: random walks and beyond. Paleobiology. 32(4):578–601. doi:10.1666/05070.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G. 2007. The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104(47):18404–18408. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704088104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Carrano MT. 2010. Models and methods for analyzing phenotypic evolution in lineages and clades. Paleontol Soc Pap. 16:245–269. doi: 10.1017/s1089332600001893.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Hopkins MJ, Lidgard S. 2015. Simple versus complex models of trait evolution and stasis as a response to environmental change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112(16):4885–4890. doi:10.1073/pnas.1403662111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Rabosky DL. 2014. Phenotypic evolution in fossil species: pattern and process. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 42(1):421–441. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152524.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Roy K. 2006. Climate change, body size evolution, and Cope’s Rule in deep-sea ostracodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103(5):1347–1352. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510550103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson GE, MacArthur RH. 1959. A theoretical ecological model of size distributions among species. Am Nat. 93(869):117–125. doi:10.1086/282063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonski D. 1996. Body size and macroevolution. In: Jablonski D, Erwin DH Lipps JH, editors. Evolutionary Paleobiology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 256–289.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonski D. 1997. Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope’s Rule. Nature. 385(16):250–252. doi:10.1038/385250a0
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JBC, Jung P, Fortunato H. 1996. Paciphilia revisited: transisthmian evolution of the Strombina Group (Gastropoda: Columbellidae). In: Jackson JBC, Coates AG, and Budd AF, editors. Evolution and Environment in Tropical America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 234–270.
   Google Scholar
• Jaitly AK. 2013. Comments on the Middle Jurassic pholadomyoids of Kachchh, western India. J Pal Soc India. 58(1):51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaitly AK. 2017. Implication of the Middle Jurassic pholadomyoids of Kachchh in the palaeobiogeography of the Middle East and South Asia: A review. J Geol Soc India. 90(1):41–50. doi:10.1007/s12594-017-0662-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery CH. 2001. Heart urchins at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary: a tale of two clades. Paleobiology. 27(1):140–158. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0140:HUATCT>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell SM, Bosence DWJ. 1991. Taphonomy and time-averaging of marine shelly faunas. In: Allison PA, and Briggs DEG, editors. Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Topics in Geobiology. Vol 9. New York: Plenum Press; p. 115–209.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsolver JG, Huey RB. 2008. Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evol Ecol Res. 10:251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW. 2004. Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope’s Rule of phyletic size increase. Evol. 58(7):1608–1612. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01740.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knouft JH, Page LM. 2003. The evolution of body size in extant groups of North American freshwater fishes: speciation, size distributions, and Cope’s Rule. Am Nat. 161(3):413–421. doi:10.1086/346133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik MA, Jablonski D, Lockwook R, Novack-Gottshall PM. 2006. Quantifying molluscan body size in evolutionary and ecological analyses: maximizing the return on data-collection efforts. Palaios. 21(6):588–597. doi:10.2110/palo.2006.p06-012r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalewski M. 1996. Time-averaging, overcompleteness, and the geological record. J Geol. 104(3):317–326. doi:10.1086/629827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalewski M. 2002. The fossil record of predation: an overview of analytical methods. Paleontol Soc Pap. 8:3–42. doi: 10.1017/S1089332600001030.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood R. 2005. Body size, extinction events, and the early Cenozoic record of veneroid bivalves: a new role for recoveries? Paleobiology. 31(4):578–590. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0578:BSEEAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer BA, Brown JH, Rusler RD. 1992. The micro and macro in body size evolution. Evolution. 46(4):939–953. doi:10.2307/2409748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 1990. Trends in body size evolution. In: McNamara KJ, editor. Evolutionary Trends. Tucson: Universityof Arizona Press; p. 75–118.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara KJ. 1990. Echinoids. In: McNamara KJ, editor. Evolutionary trends. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; p. 205–231.
   Google Scholar
• McShea DW. 1994. Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution. 48(6):1747–1763. doi:10.2307/2410505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen DS. 2006. Cope’s Rule in cryptodiran turtles: do the body sizes of extant species reflect a trend of phyletic size increase? J Evol Biol. 19(4):1210–1221. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01082.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolluscaBase. 2023. MolluscaBase. https://www.molluscabase.org;10.14284/448.
   Google Scholar
• Monarrez PM, Heim NA, Payne JL. 2023. Reduced strength and increased variability of extinction selectivity during mass extinctions. R Soc Open Sci. 10(9):230795. doi:10.1098/rsos.230795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay A, Paul S, Poddar A, Chattopadhyay D, Saha R, Basak R, Prasad S. 2023. Body size evolution of the Late Cretaceous bivalves from Ariyalur, Southern India. Cretac Res. 149:105570. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell ND. 1949. Phyletic size increase, an important trend illustrated by fossil invertebrates. Evolution. 3(2):103–124. doi:10.2307/2405545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack-Gottshall PM. 2008. Ecosystem-wide body-size trends in Cambrian–Devonian marine invertebrate lineages. Paleobiology. 34(2):210–228. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0210:EBTICM]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack-Gottshall PM, Lanier MA. 2008. Scale-dependence of Cope’s Rule in body size evolution of Paleozoic brachiopods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(14):5430–5434. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709645105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opazo LF, Twitchett RJ. 2022. Bivalve body-size distribution through the Late Triassic mass extinction event. Paleobiology. 48(3):420–445. doi:10.1017/pab.2021.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottens KJ, Dietl GP, Kelley PH, Stanford SD. 2012. A comparison of analyses of drilling predation on fossil bivalves: bulk- vs. taxon-specific sampling and the role of collector experience. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 319–320:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagel M, O’Donovan C, Meade A. 2022. General statistical model shows that macroevolutionary patterns and processes are consistent with Darwinian gradualism. Nat Commun. 13(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28595-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer AR. 1990. Predator size, prey size, and the scaling of vulnerability: hatching gastropods vs. barnacles. Ecology. 71(2):759–775. doi:10.2307/1940328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JL, Boyer AG, Brown JH, Finnegan S, Kowalewski M, Krause RA Jr, Lyons SK, McClain CR, McShea DW, Novack-Gottshall PM, et al. 2009. Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(1):24–27. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806314106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JL, Heim NA. 2020. Body size, sampling completeness, and extinction risk in the marine fossil record. Paleobiology. 46(1):23–40. doi:10.1017/pab.2019.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Wassenberg K. 1983. The effect of body size on animal abundance. Oecologia. 60(1):89–96. doi:10.1007/BF00379325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza V, Duarte LV, Renaudie J, Aberhan M. 2019. Reductions in body size of benthic macroinvertebrates as a precursor of the early Toarcian (Early Jurassic) extinction event in the Lusitanian Basin, Portugal. Paleobiology. 45(2):296–316. doi:10.1017/pab.2019.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietsch C, Gigliotti M, Anderson BM, Allmon WD. 2023. Patterns and processes in the history of body size in turritelline gastropods, Jurassic to Recent. Paleobiology. 20(4):621–641. doi:10.1017/pab.2023.7.
   Google Scholar
• Price SA, Hopkins SS. 2015. The macroevolutionary relationship between diet and body mass across mammals. Biol J Linn Soc. 115(1):173–184. doi:10.1111/bij.12495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis A, Orme CDL. 2005. Evolutionary trends in body size. In: Carel, JC, Kelley, PA Christen, Y, editors. Deciphering Growth. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. p. 1–18. doi:10.1007/3-540-28902-x_1.
   Google Scholar
• Raia P, Carotenuto F, Passaro F, Fulgione D, Fortelius M. 2012. Ecological specialization in fossil mammals explains Cope’s Rule. Am Nat. 179(3):328–337. doi:10.1086/664081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai J, Jain S. 2013. Pliensbachian nannofossils from Kachchh: Implications on the earliest Jurassic transgressive event on the western Indian margin. Zitteliana. 53:105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Raup DM, John Sepkoski J. 1986. Periodic extinction of families and genera. Sci. 231(4740):833–836. doi:10.1126/science.11542060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. URL. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rensch B. 1948. Histological changes correlated with evolutionary changes of body size. Evolution. 2(3):218–230. doi:10.2307/2405381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roopnarine PD, Vermeij GJ. 2000. One species becomes two: the case of Chione cancellata, the resurrected C. elevata and a phylogenetic analysis of Chione. J Molluscan Stud. 66(4):517–534. doi:10.1093/mollus/66.4.517.
   Google Scholar
• Roy K. 2008. Dynamics of body size evolution. Sci. 321(September):1451–1452. doi:10.1126/science.1163097.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy A, Bardhan S, Das S, Mondal S, Mallick S. 2012. Systematic revision and palaeobiogeography of Perisphinctes Waagen (Ammonoidea) from the Oxfordian of Kutch, India: stratigraphic and evolutionary implications. Palaeoworld. 21(3–4):167–192. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2012.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Roy K, Jablonski D, Martien KK. 2000. Invariant size – frequency distributions along a latitudinal gradient in marine bivalves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97(24):13150–13155. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.24.13150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudra P, Bardhan S. 2006. Status of “Trigonia ventricosa” (Bivalvia) from the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous of Kutch, western India: Kitchin’s unfinished synthesis. Cretac Res. 27(5):611–628. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudra P, Bardhan S, Shome S. 2007. Phylogeny of the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous subgenus Eselaevitrigonia (Bivalvia) of Kutch, India, and palaeobiogeographic constraints. J Paleontol. 81(5):1066–1079. doi:10.1666/pleo03-024.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha R, Paul S, Mondal S, Bardhan S, Das SS, Saha S, Sarkar D. 2021. Gastropod drilling predation in the upper Jurassic of Kutch, India. Palaios. 36(9):301–312. doi:10.2110/PALO.2020.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon MA, Brachaniec T, Kołbuk D, Saha A, Gorzelak P. 2021. Shared patterns in body size declines among crinoids during the Palaeozoic extinction events. Sci Rep. 11(1):20351. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99789-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Paul S, Saha R, Bardhan S, Rudra P. 2022. Body size trends in Trigoniida bivalves from the Mesozoic Kutch, India. Palaios. 37(4):89–103. doi:10.2110/palo.2020.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1984. Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon PR. 1996. Plus ça change — a model for stasis and evolution in different environments. Palaeoecology. 127(1–4):209–227. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(96)00096-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon PR, Lees DR, Edwards D. 1993. Making sense of microevolutionary patterns. Evolutionary Patterns Processes. 14:19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Shome S, Bardhan S, De S. 2005. Record of Tithopeltoceras Arkell (Ammonoidea) from the Late Tithonian of Kutch, India: its stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic significance. J Paleontol. 79(3):619–624. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079<0619:ROTAAF>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsen A, Hammer, Ø. 2016. Body size trends in the Ordovician to earliest Silurian of the Oslo Region. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 443:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.11.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson GG. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh IB. 1989. Dhosa Oolite—a transgressive condensation horizon of Oxfordian age in Kachchh, western India. J Geol Soc India. 34:152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh CSP, Jaitly AK, Pandey DK. 1982. First report of some Bajocian-Bathonian (Middle Jurassic ammonoids and the age of the oldest sediments from Kachchh. W India Newsl Stratigr. 11(1):37–40. doi:10.1127/nos/11/1982/37.
   Google Scholar
• Smith FA. 1992. Evolution of body size among woodrats from Baja California, Mexico. Funct Ecol. 6(3):265–273. doi:10.2307/2389516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FA, Boyer AG, Brown JH, Costa DP, Dayan T, Ernest SKM, Evans AR, Fortelius M, Gittleman JL, Hamilton MJ, et al. 2010. The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals. Sci. 330(6008):1216–1220. doi:10.1126/science.1194830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FA, Brown JH, Haskell JP, Lyons SK, Alroy J, Charnov EL, Dayan T, Enquist BJ, Morgan Ernest SK, Hadly EA, et al. 2004. Similarity of mammalian body size across the taxonomic hierarchy and across space and time. Am Nat. 163(5):672–691. doi:10.1086/382898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FA, Payne JL, Heim NA, Balk MA, Finnegan S, Kowalewski M, Lyons SK, Mcclain CR, McShea DW, Novack-Gottshall PM, et al. 2016. Body size evolution across the Geozoic. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 44(1):523–553. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012147.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley SM. 1973. An explanation for Cope’s rule. Evolution. 1:1–26. doi: 10.2307/2407115.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley SM. 1986. Anatomy of a regional mass extinction: Plio-Pleistocene decimation of the Western Atlantic bivalve fauna. Baltimore Palaios. 1(1):17–36. doi:10.2307/3514456.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer EM, Betancur-R R, Hughes LC, Westneat M, Carnevale G, White WT, Pogonoski JJ, Tyler JC, Baldwin CC, Ortí G, et al. 2022. The impact of paleoclimatic changes on body size evolution in marine fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 119(29):e2122486119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2122486119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner DD. 2009. How much can we know about the causes of evolutionary trends? Biol Philos. 24(3):341–357. doi:10.1007/s10539-008-9139-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitchett RJ. 2007. The Lilliput effect in the aftermath of the end-Permian extinction event. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 252(1–2):132–144. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeij GJ, Dietl GP, Reid DG. 2008. The trans-Atlantic history of diversity and body size in ecological guilds. Ecology. 89(11):S39–S52. doi:10.1890/07-0663.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller JT, Svensson EI. 2017. Body size evolution in an old insect order: no evidence for Cope’s Rule in spite of fitness benefits of large size. Evolution (NY). 71(9):2178–2193. doi:10.1111/evo.13302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.orgatVLIZ;10.14284/170.
   Google Scholar