First record of a neobatrachian frog (Lissamphibia: Neobatrachia) from the Eocene–Oligocene Aiuruoca Basin, Brazil

References

• AmphibiaWeb. 2023. Information on amphibian biology and conservation. [accessed 2023 Apr 8]. https://amphibiaweb.org.
   Google Scholar
• Báez AM. 1991. A new early Paleocene neobatrachian frog from the Santa Lucía Formation in south central Bolivia, and comments on the Cretaceous and early Tertiary batrachofaunas of South America. Revista Téchnica Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos. 12:529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Báez AM, Gómez RO. 2018. Dealing with homoplasy: osteology and phylogenetic relationships of the bizarre neobatrachian frog Baurubatrachus pricei from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. J Syst Paleontol. 16(4):279–308. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2017.1287130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Báez AM, Gómez RO, Ribeiro LC, Martinelli AG, Teixeira VP, Ferraz ML. 2012. The diverse cretaceous neobatrachian fauna of South America: Uberabatrachus carvalhoi, a new frog from the Maastrichtian Marília Formation, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Gondwana Res. 22(3–4):1141–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Báez AM, Muzzopappa P, de Moura GJB. 2021. The earliest records of pipimorph frogs from South America (Aptian, Crato Formaton, Brazil): a critical evaluation. Cretaceous Res. 121:104728. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelos LA, Santos RO. 2023. The lissamphibian fossil record of South America. Paleobiodivers Paleoenviron. 193:341–405. doi: 10.1007/s12549-022-00536-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bedani EF, Haddad CFB. 2002. Estudos preliminares de anfíbios (Anura: Pipidae) na Formação Entrecórregos, Bacia de Aiuruoca, terciário do estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Geociências-UNG-Ser. 7:35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bedani FE, Haddad CFB. 2012. Registro de formas iniciais pós-eclosão de anfíbios anuros (Pipidae) dos sedimentos terciários da Formação Entre-Córregos, Aiuruoca (MG). Revista Geociências-UNG-Ser. 11:89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Briceño JD, Sánchez R, Scheyer TM, Carrillo JD, Delfino M, Georgalis GL, Kerber L, Ruiz-Ramoni D, Birindelli JLO, Cadena E-A, et al. 2021. A Pliocene–Pleistocene continental biota from Venezuela. Swiss J Palaeontol. 140(1):1–76. doi: 10.1186/s13358-020-00216-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho IS, Agnolin F, Rolando MAA, Novas FE, Xavier-Neto J, Freitas FI, Andrade JAFG. 2019. A new genus of pipimorph frog (anura) from the Early Cretaceous Crato formation (Aptian) and the evolution of South American tongueless frogs. J South Am Earth Sci. 92:222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Fernandes MC, Bernardes-de-Oliveira MEC, Hoelzel A. 2013. Tafoflora paleógena da Formação Entre-Córregos (Bacia de Aiuruoca): arquitetura foliar e paleoclima. Geologia USP Série Científica. 13:33–46. doi: 10.5327/Z1519-874X2013000100003.
   Google Scholar
• De Blainville H. 1816. Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Bulletin Société philomathique Paris. 8:105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Delfino M, Sánchez-Villagra M. 2018. A late Miocene pipine frog from the Urumaco Formation, Venezuela. Ameghiniana. 55(2):210–214. doi: 10.5710/AMGH.04.10.2017.3136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson P. 1973. The significance of small bones in paleoecological interpretation. Univ Wyoming Contrib Geol. 12:5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986. Biology of amphibians. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duméril AMC. 1806. Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile à l’aide de tableaux synoptiques. Paris: Allais Libraire.
   Google Scholar
• Ford LS, Cannatella DC. 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetol Monogr. 7:94–117. doi: 10.2307/1466954.
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Delgado SG, Bernardes-de-Oliveira MEC. 2004. Annonaceae e lauraceae da formação entre-córregos (Paleógeno) na Bacia de Airuoca: implicações paleoclimáticas. Rev Bras Paleontol. 2:117–122. doi: 10.4072/rbp.2004.2.04.
   Google Scholar
• Frost DR. 2023. Amphibian species of the world 6.1, an online reference. [accessed 2023 Apr 8]. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia MJ, Santos M, Hasui Y. 2000. Palinologia da parte aflorante da Formação Entre-Córregos, bacia de Aiuruoca, Terciário de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Universidade Guarulhos Geociências. 5:259.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez RO. 2011. Los neobatracios (Amphibia: Anura) del paleoceno de la formación Santa Lucía, Bolivia: aportes a la história evolutiva y paleobiogeográfica de los anuros sudamericanos [ PhD dissertation]. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez RO. 2016. A new pipid frog from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia and early evolution of crown-group Pipidae. Cretaceous Res. 62:52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez RO, Báez AM. 2010. The anuran pelvis: evidence for the phylogenetic placement of the Tiupampan Estesiella boliviensis. Ameghiniana (Suplemento Resúmenes). 47:13R–14R.
   Google Scholar
• Gontijo-Pascutti A, Bezerra FH, La Terra E, Almeida JC. 2010. Brittle reactivation of mylonitic fabric and the origin of the Cenozoic Rio Santana Graben, southeastern Brazil. J South Amer Earth Sci. 29(2):522–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2009.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas A. 2003. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics. 19:23–90. doi: 10.1016/S0748-3007(03)00006-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Jaekel O. 1909. Über die Klassen der Tetrapoden. Zool Anz. 34:193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Lemierre A, Bailon S, Folie A, Laurin M. 2023. A new pipid from the Cretaceous of Africa (In Becetèn, Niger) and early evolution of the Pipidae. J Syst Paleontol. 21(1):2266428. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2023.2266428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano AS, Fabrezi M, Vences M. 2007. Intercalary elements, treefrogs, and the early differentiation of a complex system in the Neobatrachia. Anat Rec. 290(12):1551–1567. doi: 10.1002/ar.20608.
   Google Scholar
• Moen DS, Morlon H, Wiens JJ. 2016. Testing convergence versus history: convergence dominates phenotypic evolution for over 150 million years in frogs. Syst Biol. 65:161–176. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzopappa P. 2019. Calyptocephalella (Anura, Australobatrachia) remains from Río Santa Cruz (Early–Middle Miocene, Santa Cruz Formation), Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. Publicación Electrónica Asociación Paleontológica Argentina. 19:47–54. doi: 10.5710/PEAPA.27.06.2019.282.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoli L. 2017. New clues on anuran evolution: the oldest record of an extant hyloid clade in the Oligocene of Patagonia. Hist Biol. 29(8):1031–1044. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2017.1282475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleobiology Database. 2023. Checklist dataset. [accessed 2023 Apr 8]. https://paleobiodb.org/classic.
   Google Scholar
• Reig OA. 1958. Proposiciones para una nueva macrosistemática de los anuros (nota preliminar). Physis. 21:109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rolando AMA, Agnolin FL, Corsolini J. 2019. A new pipoid frog (Anura, Pipimorpha) from the Paleogene of Patagonia. Paleobiogeographical implications. CR Palevol. 18(7):725–734. doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2019.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz CT, Hackspacher PC, Neto JH, Iunes PJ, Guedes S, Ribeiro LFB, Paulo SR. 2003. Recognition of Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Neogene tectonic reactivation through apatite fission-track analysis in Precambrian areas of southeast Brazil: association with the opening of the south Atlantic Ocean. J South Amer Earth Sci. 15(7):765–774. doi: 10.1016/S0895-9811(02)00131-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchiz B. 1998. Encyclopedia of paleoherpetology. Part 4. Salientia. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
   Google Scholar
• Santos M. 1999. Serra da Mantiqueira e Planalto do Alto Rio Grande: a bacia terciária de Aiuruoca e evolução morfotectônica [ PhD dissertation]. Rio Claro: Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho.
   Google Scholar
• Suazo-Lara F, Gómez RO. 2022. In the shadow of dinosaurs: Late Cretaceous frogs are distinct components of a widespread tetrapod assemblage across Argentinean and Chilean Patagonia. Cretaceous Res. 131:105085. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueb L. 1973. Bones, frogs, and evolution. In: Vial J, editor. Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press; p. 65–132.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos TS, da Silva FR, dos Santos TG, Prado VH, Provete DB. 2019. South American anurans: species diversity and description trends through time and space. In: Vasconcelos T, da Silva F, dos Santos T, Prado V, Provete D, editors. Biogeographic patterns of South American anurans. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; p. 9–84.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss FE, Malabarba MC, Malabarba LR. 2014. A new stem fossil characid (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from the Eocene-Oligocene of southeastern Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol. 12(2):439–450. doi: 10.1590/1982-0224-20140072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalán PV, Oliveira JA. 2005. Origem e evolução estrutural do Sistema de Riftes Cenozóicos do Sudeste do Brasil. Boletim Geociencias PETROBRAS. 13(2):269–300.
   Google Scholar