The Rhetorical Presidency Made Flesh: A Political Science Classic in the Age of Donald Trump

REFERENCES

• Ackerman, Bruce C. 1993. We The People: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azari, Julia. 2018. “Forget Norms. Our Democracy Depends on Values.” FiveThirtyEight, April 24.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Jeremy D., and Brandon Rottinghaus. 2013. “The Historical Presidency: The Development of Unilateral Power and the Problem of the Power to Warn: Washington through McKinley.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43: 186–204. doi: 10.1111/psq.12009
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Thomas R. 2018. “Perverse Politics: Recess Appointments, Noel Canning, and the Limits of Law.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48(2): 373–86. doi: 10.1111/psq.12460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Fred. 1990. “Mr. Popularity.” New Republic, January 8 and 15.
   Google Scholar
• Berns, Walter. 1994. “The Prattling Presidency.” Wall Street Journal, October 31.
   Google Scholar
• Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimes, Terri, and Stephen Skowronek. 1996. “Woodrow Wilson’s Critique of Popular Leadership: Reassessing the Modern-Traditional Divide.” Polity 29 (Fall): 27-64. doi: 10.2307/3235274
   Google Scholar
• Bimes, Terri, and Quinn Mulroy. 2004. “The Rise and Decline of Presidential Populism.” Studies in American Political Development 8(2): 136-59.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, Jordan. “The Isolated Presidency: John Tyler and Unilateral Presidential Power.”  American Political Thought 7 (Winter): 26-56.
   Google Scholar
• Caruson, Kiki, and Victoria A. Farrar-Myers. 2007. “Promoting the President’s Foreign Policy Agenda: Presidential Use of Executive Agreements as Policy Vehicles.” Political Research Quarterly 60: 631–44. doi: 10.1177/1065912907307519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Phillip J. 2002. By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, Edward. 1957. The President: Office and Powers 1787-1957, 4th ed. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, David A. 2002. The Opposition Presidency: Leadership and the Constraints of History. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, David A. 2009. “The Rhetorical Presidency: Still Standing Tall.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(4): 932–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03715.x
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Thomas E. 1980. The State of the Presidency, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, George C. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, Connor M., and Charles U. Zug. 2018. “What Happened to the State of the Union Address? Originally, It Helped the President and Congress Deliberate.” Washington Post, January 30.
   Google Scholar
• “Eyes on Congress Is President’s Idea in Reading New Message.” 1913. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, April 7: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jeffrey. “A ‘Weapon in the Hands of the People’: The Rhetorical Presidency in Historical and Conceptual Context.” Critical Review 19(2-3): 197-240. doi: 10.1080/08913810701766108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jeffrey, and Shterna Friedman, eds. 2012. Rethinking the Rhetorical Presidency. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, Bryan. 2007. “The Idea of an Un-Rhetorical Presidency.” Critical Review 19(2-3): 325-34. doi: 10.1080/08913810701766215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, William G. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, Samuel. 1994. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraig, Robert Alexander. 2004. Woodrow Wilson and the Lost World of the Oratorical Statesman. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laracey, Mel. 2002. Presidents and the People: The Partisan Story of Going Public. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laracey, Mel. 2009. “The Rhetorical Presidency Today: How Does It Stand Up?” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(1): 908-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03714.x
   Google Scholar
• Lepore, Jill. 2009. “Annals of the Presidency.” New Yorker, January 12.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Elvin T. 2002. “Five Trends in Presidential Rhetoric: An Analysis from George Washington to Bill Clinton.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(2): 328-66. doi: 10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00223.x
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Elvin T. 2008. The Anti-Intellectual Presidency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, Theodore J. 2009. The End of Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, Rich, 2018. “Trump Norm Violations Don't Make Him a Despot.” Newsmax, January 18.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Kenneth R. 2001. With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, Terry M. 2009. “The Revolution in Presidential Studies.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39: 701–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03701.x
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, Russell. 2017. “Foreword” to Tulis 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Curt. 2011. “The Presidency and the Political Order in Context.” Polity 43: 513–31. doi: 10.1057/pol.2011.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pangle, Thomas L. 2012. “The Puzzle of The Rhetorical Presidency.” Critical Review 19(2-3): 403-414. doi: 10.1080/08913810701766298
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, Anne C. 2013. “The Evolution of Popular Presidential Communication.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, Anne C. 2015. “Reassessing the Assumptions behind the Evolution of Popular Presidential Communication.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45(1): 70-90. doi: 10.1111/psq.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, Brandon, and Jason Maier. 2007. “The Power of Decree: Presidential Use of Executive Proclamations, 1977–2005.” Political Research Quarterly 60: 338–43. doi: 10.1177/1065912907301691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. 1989. The Imperial Presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storing, Herbert J. 1995. Toward a More Perfect Union, ed. Joseph M. Bessette. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1991. “On the State of Constitutional Theory.” Law and Social Inquiry 16(1): 711–716.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K 1996. “Revising the Rhetorical Presidency.” In Beyond the Rhetorical Presidency, ed. Martin J. Medhurst. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K. 2003. “Deliberation Between Institutions.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K. 2017. The Rhetorical Presidency, new ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K., and Nicole Mellow. 2018. Legacies of Losing in American Politics. Chicago:  University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Will, George. 1993. “Rhetorical Presidency.” Newsweek, February 8.
   Google Scholar
• Zug, Charles U. 2017. “Could Political Science Become Diagnostic? Restoring a Forgotten Method.” Perspectives on Political Science. DOI: 10.1080/10457097.2017.1406266.
   Google Scholar