Publication Cover
Critical Review
A Journal of Politics and Society
Volume 30, 2018 - Issue 3-4
505
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Objectivity, Political Order, and Responsibility in Max Weber’s Thought

REFERENCES

  • Aron, Raymond. 1970. Main Currents in Sociological Thought, vol. 2: Durkheim, Pareto, Weber. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.
  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1990. Seduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Baumgarten, Eduard. 1964. Max Weber, Werk und Person. Tuebingen: Mohr.
  • Benda, Julien. [1928] 2007. The Treason of Intellectuals, trans. Richard Aldington. London: Routledge.
  • Bendix, Reinhard, and Guenther Roth. 1971. Scholarship and Partisanship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bianco, Francesco. 1997. Le basi teoriche dell’opera di Max Weber. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
  • Behnegar, Nasser. 2003. Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Beetham, David. 1985. Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1978. “La teoria dello stato e del potere.” In Rossi 1981.
  • Boudon, Raymond. 2001. The Origin of Values: Sociology and Philosophy of Beliefs. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
  • Breiner, Peter. 1989. “Democratic Autonomy, Political Ethics, and Moral Luck.” Political Theory 7(4): 550-74. doi: 10.1177/009059178901700404
  • Breuer, Stefan. 1998. “The Concept of Democracy in Weber’s Political Sociology.” In Max Weber: Democracy and Modernization, ed. Ralph Schroeder. London: Macmillan.
  • Brink, David Owen. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brubaker, Rogers. 1984. The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Bruun, Hans Henrik. 2001. “Weber on Rickert: From Value Relation to Ideal Type.” Max Weber Studies 1(2): 138-60.
  • Bruun, Hans Henrik. 2007. Science, Values and Politics in Max Weber’s Methodology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Burger, Thomas. 1976. Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Cavalli, Alessandro. 1987. “Max Weber, il governo della democrazia.” Annali di Sociologia 2: 12-58.
  • Ciepley, David. 1999. “Democracy Despite Ignorance: A Weberian Reply to Somin and Friedman.” Critical Review 13(1): 191-227. doi: 10.1080/08913819908443529
  • D’Andrea, Dimitri. 2005. L’incubo degli Ultimi Uomini: Etica e Politica in Max Weber. Firenze: Carocci.
  • Diggins, John Patrick. 1996. Max Weber and the Spirit of Tragedy. New York: Basic Books.
  • Eden, Robert. 1983. “Bad Conscience for a Nietzschean Age: Weber’s Calling for Science.” Review of Politics 45: 366-92. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500044843
  • Eden, Robert. Political Leadership and Nihilism: A Study of Weber and Nietzsche. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
  • Ferrera, Maurizio. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Friedman, Jeffrey. 2000. “After Democracy, Bureaucracy? Rejoinder to Ciepley.” Critical Review 14(1): 113-37. doi: 10.1080/08913810008443553
  • Foucault, Michel. 1987. The History of Sexuality, vol. 2: The Use of Pleasure. London: Penguin.
  • Gerth, Hans H., and C. Wright Mills. 1946. “Introduction: The Man and His Work.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Grossein, Jean Pierre. 1996. “Presentation.” In Sociologie des Religions, Max Weber. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Harrington, Austin. 2000. “Value-Spheres or Validity Spheres? Weber, Habermas, and Modernity.” Max Weber Studies 1: 84-103.
  • Heinrich, Nathalie. 2006. “La sociologie à l’épreuve des valeurs.” Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 2(121): 287-315.
  • Hennis, Wilhelm. 1994. “The Meaning of Wertfreiheit: On the Background and Motives of Weber’s Postulate.” Sociological Theory 12: 113-25. doi: 10.2307/201858
  • Honigsheim, Paul. 2000. The Unknown Max Weber. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
  • Jaspers, Karl. 1989. On Max Weber. New York: Paragon House.
  • Kalberg, Stephen. 1994. Max Weber’s Comparative Historical Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kelly, Duncan. 2004. “Max Weber and the Rights of Citizens.” Max Weber Studies 5: 23-49. doi: 10.15543/MWS/2004/1/4
  • Kim, Sung Ho. 2002. “Max Weber’s Liberal Nationalism.” History of Political Thought 23: 432-57.
  • Koch, Andrew M. 1994 “The Ontological Assumptions of Max Weber’s Methodology.” Texas Journal of Political Studies 17(1): 5-21.
  • Kocka, Jürgen. 1973. “Marx und Max Weber im Vergleich: Sozialwissenschaften zwischen Dogmatismus und Dezisionismus.” In Geschichte und Ökonomie, ed. Hans-Ulrich Wehler. Cologne: Kiepenhauer und Witsch.
  • Lassman, Peter, ed. 2006. Max Weber. London: Ashgate.
  • Lassman, Peter. 2011. Pluralism. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Lassman, Peter, and Irving Velody, eds. 1989. Max Weber’s “Science as a Vocation.” London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Levy, Jack S. 2008. “Counterfactual and Case Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffenmeier, Henry M. Brady, and David Collier. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Löwith, Karl. 1982. Max Weber and Karl Marx. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Lukàcs, Georg. [1956] 1981. The Destruction of Reason. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
  • Mayer, Jacob Peter. 1998. Max Weber and German Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1965. “Max Weber’s Political Sociology and His Philosophy of World History.” International Social Science Journal 17: 23-45.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1974. The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1983. “The Antinomian Structure of Max Weber’s Political Thought.” Current Perspectives on Social Theory 4: 289-311.
  • Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1984. Max Weber and German Politics 1890-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Oakes, Guy. 1988. Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Oakes, Guy. 2003. “Max Weber on Value Rationality and Value Spheres.” Journal of Classical Sociology 3: 27-45. doi: 10.1177/1468795X03003001693
  • Oppenheim, Franz. 1968. Moral Principles in Political Philosophy. New York: Random House.
  • Owen, David, and Tracy Strong. 2004. “Max Weber’s Calling to Knowledge and Action.” In Max Weber: The Vocation Lectures, ed. David Owen and Tracy Strong. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
  • Palonen, Kari. 1999. “Max Weber’s Reconceptualization of Freedom.” Political Theory 27(4): 523-44. doi: 10.1177/0090591799027004005
  • Poggi, Gianfanco. 2006. Max Weber: A Brief Introduction. London: Wiley.
  • Portis, Edward B. 1980. “Political Action and Social Science: Max Weber’s Two Arguments for Objectivity.” Polity 12(3): 409-27. doi: 10.2307/3234214
  • Ringer, Fritz. 1997. Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Rossi, Pietro. 1971. Lo storicismo tedesco contemporaneo. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Rossi, Pietro, ed. 1981. Max Weber e l’analisi del mondo moderno. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Satkunanandan, Shalini. 2014. “Max Weber and the Ethos of Politics Beyond Calculation.” American Political Science Review 108(1): 169-81. doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000609
  • Scaff, Lawrence. 1989. Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1979. “Value Neutrality and the Ethic of Responsibility.” In Max Weber’s Vision of History: Ethics and Methods, ed. Günther Roth and Wolfgang Schluchter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber’s Developmental History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1996. Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Somin, Ilya. 2000. “Democracy and Voter Ignorance Revisited: Rejoinder to Ciepley.” Critical Review 14(1): 99-111. doi: 10.1080/08913810008443552
  • Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Strong, Tracy B. 1992. “What Have We to Do with Morals? Nietzsche and Weber on History and Ethics.” History of the Human Sciences 5: 9-18. doi: 10.1177/095269519200500302
  • Suzuki, Masahito. 2003. “The Antinomies of Conviction and Responsibility in Max Weber’s Life and Thought.” Max Weber Studies 3(2): 199-220.
  • Swedberg, Richard. 2003. “The Changing Picture of Max Weber.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 283-306. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100105
  • Swedberg, Richard. 2005. The Max Weber Dictionary. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Tetlock, Philip E., and Aaron Belkin. 2001. Counterfactual Though Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tuccari, Francesco. 1993. I dilemmi della democrazia moderna: Max Weber e Robert Michels. Roma: Laterza.
  • Turner, Charles. 2001. “Weberian Social Thought, History of.” In International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Neil Smelser and Paul Baltes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Turner, Stephen, ed. 2000. The Cambridge Companion to Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turner, Stephen, and Regis Fac. 1981. “Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Weber’s Methodological Writings.” Sociological Review 29: 5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1981.tb03019.x
  • Turner, Stephen, and Regis Fac. 1984. Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Vahland, Joachim. 2001. Max Webers Entzauberte Welt. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
  • Villa, Dana. 1999. “Integrity, Disenchantment, and the Illusion of Politics.” Constellations 6: 25-47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.00161
  • Warren, Mark. 1988. “Max Weber’s Liberalism in a Nietzschian World.” American Political Science Review 82: 31-50. doi: 10.2307/1958057
  • Weber, Max. 1917. “Ein Vortrag Max Webers über die Probleme der Staatssoziologie.” Neue Freie Presse no. 19102, October 25.
  • Weber, Max. 1946a. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1946b. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1946c. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Weber Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, ed. Günther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1973. Soziologie, Universalgeschichtliche Analysen, Politik. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
  • Weber, Max. 1978. Selections in Translation, ed. W. G. Runciman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1994. Political Writings, ed. by Peter Lassman and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, Max. 2004. The Essential Weber: A Reader, ed. Sam Whimster. London: Routledge.
  • Wellen, Richard. 2001. “The Politics of Intellectual Integrity.” Max Weber Studies 2(1): 81-102.
  • Whimster, Sam. 1995. “Max Weber on the Erotic and Some Comparison with the Works of Foucault.” International Sociology 10(4): 447-62. doi: 10.1177/026858095010004006
  • Wolin, Sheldon. 1981. “Max Weber: Legitimation, Method, and the Politics of Theory.” Political Theory 9(3): 401-24. doi: 10.1177/009059178100900308

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.