Left-Kantian Perfectionism

REFERENCES

• Allison, Henry E. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2005. “Nicomachean Ethics.” In Michael Morgan, ed., Classics of Moral and Political Theory, 4th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Backhaus, Jürgen, ed. 1998. Christian Wolff and Law and Economics. Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Bruno. [1848] 1972. “Erste Wahlrede von 1848.” In Ernst Barnikol, Bruno Bauer: Studien und Materialien, ed. P. Riemer and H.–M. Sass. Assen: van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodei, Remo. 2002. Destini personali: L’età della colonizzazione delle coscienze. Feltrinelli. Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Burrow, J. W., 1969. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action, ed. J. W. Burrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cesa, Claudio. 2000. “Introduzione: Diritto naturale e filosofia classica tedesca.” In Diritto naturale e filosofia classica tedesca, ed. Luca Fonnesu and Barbara Henry. Pisa: Pacini.
   Google Scholar
• Chytry, Joseph. 1989. The Aesthetic State: A Quest in Modern German Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, James, and Gabriel Gottlieb, eds. 2021. Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corr, Charles A. 1975. “Christian Wolff and Leibniz.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36(2): 241-62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichte, J. G. [1794] 1988. “Some Lectures Concerning the Scholar’s Vocation.” In Fichte, Early Philosophical Writings, trans. and ed. Daniel Breazeale. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fichte, J. G. [1798] 1971. System der Sittenlehre. In idem, Werke, Bd. IV. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Fichte, J. G. [1793] 1973. “Zurückforderung der Denkfreiheit von den Fürsten Europens, die sie bisher unterdrückten.” In idem, Schriften zur Revolution, ed. Bernard Willms. Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein.
   Google Scholar
• Fichte, J. G. [1800] 1988. Der geschloßne Handelsstaat. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. I/7. Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Grapotte, S., and T. Prunea-Bretonnet, eds. 2011. Kant et Wolff: Héritages et ruptures. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Heinekamp, Albert. 1986. Beiträge zur Wirkungs- und Rezeptionsgeschichte von G. W. Leibniz. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, Dieter. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, ed. D. S. Pacini. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández Marcos, Maximiliano. 2020. “Rights-Perfectionism, From Kant’s Grundlegung to Politics: Kantian Debates.” In Moggach, Mooren, and Quante 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 2005. Leviathan. In Classics of Moral and Political Theory, 4th ed., ed. Michael Morgan. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Thomas Sören, ed. 2018. Fichtes Geschlossener Handelsstaat. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Hufeland, Gottfried. 1785. Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts. Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• von Humboldt, Wilhelm. [1792] 1969. The Limits of State Action, ed. John W. Burrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1851. Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen. Breslau: Trewendt.
   Google Scholar
• von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1854. The Sphere and Duties of Government, trans. Joseph Coulthard. London: John Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1963. Humanist Without Portfolio: An Anthology of the Writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt, ed. M. Cowan. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeschke, Walter. 1990. “Ästhetische Revolution: Stichworte zur Einführung.” In Früher Idealismus und Frühromantik: Der Streit um die Grundlagen der Ästhetik (1795-1805), ed. Walter Jaeschke and Helmut Holzhey. Hamburg: Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1786] 1923. “Rezension zu Gottlieb Hufeland, Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts.” Ak. vol. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1787] 1956. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. L. W. Beck. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1793] 1970. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May Be True in Theory, But It Does Not Apply in Practice.’” In Kant’s Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1793] 1998. Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1795] 1970. “Perpetual Peace.” In Kant’s Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Alexander. 1999. Welfare in the Kantian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, Margit. 1986. “Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Friedrich Schillers.” In Aufklärung- Geschichte-Revolution: Studien zur Philosophie der Aufklärung, ed. Manfred Buhr and Wolfgang Förster. Bd. 2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, Diethelm. 1998. “Der liberale Interventionsstaat: Staatszweck und Staatstätigkeit in der deutschen politischen Theorie des 18. und der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts.” In Recht und Rechtswissenschaft im mitteldeutschen Raum, ed. Heiner Lück. Cologne: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, David. 2007. The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, Robert. 1932. Guillaume de Humboldt: La formation de sa pensée jusqu’en 1794. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Maesschalck, Marc. 1996. Droit et création sociale chez Fichte: une philosophie moderne de l’action politique. Louvain: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Marx. Karl. [1844] 2009. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, ed. Michael Quante. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1991. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. [1873] 1960. Autobiography of John Stuart Mill. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, Douglas. 2000. “The Construction of Juridical Space: Kant’s Analogy of Relation in The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 7, Modern Philosophy, ed. Mark Gedney. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, Douglas. 2008. “Schiller, Scots, and Germans: Freedom and Diversity in The Aesthetic Education of Man.” Inquiry 51(1): 16-36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moggach, Douglas. 2016. “Die Kultur der Zerrissenheit und ihre Aufhebung.” In Die Philosophie des Marktes, Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie, vol. 7, ed. Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, Douglas, Nadine Mooren, and Michael Quante, eds. 2020. Der Perfektionismus der Autonomie. Paderborn: Fink/Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Oz-Salzburger, Fania. 2002. “Scots, Germans, Republic and Commerce.” In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, vol. 2, ed. Martin van Gelderen and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, Michael. 2009. “Kommentar.” In Karl Marx, Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, ed. Michael Quante. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, Michael. 2020. “Karl Marx – ein postkantischer Perfektionist?” In Moggach, Mooren, and Quante 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhold, K. L. 1792. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, 2nd edition. Jena.
   Google Scholar
• Rohls, Michael. 2004. Kantisches Naturrecht und historisches Zivilrecht: Wissenschaft und bürgerliche Freiheit bei Gottlieb Hufeland (1760-1817). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Rojek, Tim. 2020. “Perfektionistische Gehalte der Rugeschen Geschichtsphilosophie?” In Moggach, Mooren, Quante 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Friedrich. [1788] 1962. “Die Götter Griechenlands.” Sämtliche Werke, Bd. I. Munich: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Friedrich. [1790] 1962. “Die Gesetzgebung des Lykurgos und Solon.” Sämtliche Werke, Bd. IV. Munich: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Friedrich. [1792] 2003. “Kallias or Concerning Beauty: Letters to Gottfried Körner.” In Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, ed. J. M. Bernstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller Friedrich. [1795] 1962. “Über naive und sentimentalische Dichtung.” Sämtliche Werke, Bd. V. Munich: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Friedrich. [1795] 1967. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, bilingual edition, ed. and trans. Elizabeth Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman Jones, Gareth. 2002. “Introduction.” In idem, ed., Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman Jones, Gareth. 2016. Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmon, J. L. 1960. Political Messianism: The Romantic Phase. London: Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, Keith. 1988. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750-1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waibel, V., M. Ruffing, and D. Wagner, eds. 2018. Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, Owen. 2020. Fichte’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waszek, Norbert. 2020. “Ergänzung und Überschreiten von Hegels politischer Philosophie durch Eduard Gans.” In Moggach, Mooren, and Quante 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, E., and L. A. Willoughby. “Introduction” to Schiller [1795] 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, Bernard. 1967. Die totale Freiheit: Fichtes politische Philosophie. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. [1754] 1969. Institutiones juris naturae et gentium. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 26, ed. M. Thomann. Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. [1758] 1988. Principes du droit de la nature et des gens, extrait du grand ouvrage latin, par M. Formey, tome premier. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.
   Google Scholar
• Yack, Bernard. 1986. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar