Anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies

References

• Will CL, Luhrmann R. Spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis, structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001;13(3): 290–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieve GW, Khusial PR. The anti-Sm immune response in autoimmunity and cell biology. Autoimmun Rev 2003;2(5):235–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmeier T, Foulaki K, Luhrmann R. Evidence for three distinct D proteins, which react differentially with anti-Sm autoantibodies, in the cores of the major snRNPs Ul, U2, U4/U6 and U5. Nucleic Acids Res 1990;18(22):6475–6841.
   Google Scholar
• Brahms H, Raker VA, Van Venrooij WJ, Luhrmann R. A major, novel systemic lupus erythematosus autoantibody class recognizes the E, F, and G Sm snRNP proteins as an E-F-G complex but not in their denatured states. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40(4):672–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brahms H, Meheus L, de Brabandere V, Fischer U, Luhrmann R. Symmetrical dimethylation of arginine residues in spliceosomal Sm protein B/B1 and the Sm-like protein L5m4, and their interaction with the SMN protein. RNA 2001;7(11):1531–1542.
   Google Scholar
• Brahms H, Raymackers J, Union A, de Keyser F, Meheus L, Luhrmann R. The C-terminal RG dipeptide repeats of the spliceosomal Sm proteins D1 and D3 contain symmetrical dimethylarginines, which form a major B-cell epitope for anti-Sm autoantibodies. J Biol Chem 2000;275(22):17122–17129.
   Google Scholar
• Meister G, Eggert C, Fischer U. SMN-mediated assembly of RNPs: a complex story. Trends Cell Biol 2002;12(10):472–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ. The 1982revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25 (11): 1271 — 1277.
   Google Scholar
• Clotet B, Guardia J, Pigrau C, Lience E, Murcia C, Pujol R, Bacardi R. Incidence and clinical significance of anti-ENA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Estimation by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Scand J Rheumatol 1984;13(1):15–20.
   Google Scholar
• ter Borg EJ, Groen H, Horst G, Limburg PC, Wouda AA, Kallenberg CG. Clinical associations of antiribonucleoprotein antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990;20 (3):164 — 173.
   Google Scholar
• Grennan DM, Bunn C, Hughes GR, Buchanan WW, Dick WC. Frequency and clinical significance of antibodies to ribonucleoprotein in SLE and other connective tissue disease subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis 1977;36(5):442–447.
   Google Scholar
• Tapanes FJ, Vasquez M, Ramirez R, Matheus C, Rodriguez MA, Bianco N. Cluster analysis of antinuclear autoantibodies in the prognosis of SLE nephropathy: are anti-extractable nuclear antibodies protective? Lupus 2000;9(6):437–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnett FC, Hamilton RG, Roebber MG, Harley JB, Reichlin M. Increased frequencies of Sm and nRNP autoantibodies in American blacks compared to whites with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1988;15 (12):1773 —1776.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg RA, Tan EM, Dixon FJ. Presence of anti-Sm reactivity in autoimmune mouse strains. J Exp Med 1978;147(2):582–587.
   Google Scholar
• Kurata N, Tan EM. Identification of antibodies to nuclear acid antigens by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Arthitis Rheum 1976;193(3):574–580.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro E, Palau J. Anti-Sm sera are misdetected by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. A critical analysis of CIE and western blotting on the detection of human antinuclear antibodies. J Autoimmun 1991;4 (2):213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Westgeest AA, Van den Brink HG, de Jong J, Swaak AJ, Smeenk RJ. Routine testing for antinuclear antibodies: a comparison of immunofluorescence, counterimmunoelectro-phoresis and immunoblotting. J Autoimmun 1988;1 (2): 159 —170.
   Google Scholar
• Walravens MJ, Vanherrewegwn H, Lacquet F, Godefridis G, Korevits G, Stevens E, Marien G, Molenberghs G. Counter-immunoelectrophoresis with serum prediffusion: an improved method for the detection and identification of antibodies against extractable nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens. J Immunol Methods 1997;201 (1): 89 —98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phan TG, Ng WW, Bird D, Smithers K, Wong V, Gallagher K, Williams A, Adelstein S. High-quality, cost effective strategy for detection of autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens. Chin Diagn Lab Immunol 2001;8(3):471–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kallenberg CG, ter Borg EJ, Jaarsma D, Limburg PC. Detection of autoantibodies to ribonucleoproteins by counter-immunoelectropheresis, immunoblotting and RNA-immuno-precipitation: comparison of results. Chin Exp Rheumatol 1990;8(1):35–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Duijnhoven HLP, Van de Warenburg FJM, Willems RJWP, Ermens AANI. A comparison of ELISA assays as routine diagnostic test for detection of autoantibodies against extractable nuclear antigens. Clin Biochem 1999;32 (3) :179— 183.
   Google Scholar
• Westgeest AA, Van den Brink HG, de Jong J, Swaak AJ, Smeenk RJ, Westgeest AA, Van den Brink HG, de Jong J, Swaak AJ, Smeenk RJ. Antinuclear antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of counter-immunoelectrophoresis and immunoblotting. Rheumatol Int 1987;7(2):77–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, Y.H., Chen, S.L., Ye, P., The clinical significance of antibodies to SM, RNP and SSR polypeptides detected by immunoblotting technique. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi., 29(8) (1990) 472–5, 510.
   Google Scholar