Visual Communication of Climate Change: Local Framing and Place Attachment

References

• Akerlof, K., E. W. Maibach, D. Fitzgerald, A. Y. Cedeno, and A. Neuman. 2013. Do people ‘personally experience’ global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Global Environmental Change 23 (1):81−91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2014. Louisiana loses its boot. Retrieved from https://medium.com/matter/louisiana-loses-its-boot-b55b3bd52d1e
   Google Scholar
• Brantner, C., S. Geise, and K. Lobinger. 2013, June. Fractured paradigm? Theories, concepts and methodology of visual framing research: A systematic review. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L., and A. Vainio-Mattila. 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservations: Opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal 31 (3):417−37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Environmental Decisions and ecoAmerica. 2014. Connecting on climate: A guide to effective climate change communication. Washington, DC: Earth Institute. Retrieved from http://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ecoAmerica-CRED-2014-Connecting-on-Climate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. C., H. Wu, and L. Huang. 2013. The influence of place attachment on the relationship between destination attractiveness and environmentally responsible behavior for island tourism in Penghu, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21 (8):1166−87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.750329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana. 2007. Integrated ecosystem restoration and hurricane protection: Louisiana's comprehensive master plan for a sustainable coast. Baton Rouge, LA: CPRAL.
   Google Scholar
• Dardis, F. E. 2007. The role of issue-framing functions in affecting beliefs and opinions about a sociopolitical issue. Communication Quarterly 55 (2):247−65.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and K. D. van Liere. 1978. The new ecological paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education 9:10−19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., K. D. van Liere, A. G. Mertig, and R. E. Jones. 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3):425−42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Geise, S., and C. Baden. 2015. Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame processing theory. Communication Theory 25 (1):46−69. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., and L. A. Comeau. 2011. Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change 21 (4):1301−07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goidel, K., C. Davis, M. Climek, and L. Brou. 2012. Louisiana survey: Support for fracking. Retrieved from https://sites01.lsu.edu/wp/pprl/files/2012/07/2013Louisiana-Survey-FINAL-FULL-REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., C. R. Colocousis, and C. M. Duncan. 2010. Place effects on environmental views. Rural Sociology 75 (2):326−47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., and E. C. Nisbet. 2012. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research 39 (6):701−23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkin, M., and L. Harris. 2001. Vision and attention. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, G. T., J. D. Absher, and A. R. Graefe. 2003. The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leisure Sciences 25 (1):33−50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77 (1–2):45−72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. 2007. Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change, ed. S. C. Moser and L. Dilling, 44−63. New York, NY: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., and I. H. Langford. 2001. Climate change now and in the future: A mixed methodological study of public perceptions in Norwich (UK) (Working Paper ECM 01-05). Norwich, UK: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., S. Nicholson-Cole and L. Whitmarsh. 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17 (3):445−59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., and N. F. Pidgeon. 2006. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77 (1):73−95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 1995. Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D., and W. Smith. 1999. Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., and L. Dilling. 2011. Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, ed. J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and S. Schlosberg, 161−74. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2013, January). NOAA, USGS: Climate change impacts to U.S. coasts threaten public health, safety and economy. Retrieved from http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/20130125_coastalclimateimpacts.html
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Cole, S. A. 2005. Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 (3):255−73.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51 (2):12−23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E., P. Hart, T. Myers, and M. Ellithorpe. 2013. Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication 63 (4):766−85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S. J., and M. Hulme. 2009. An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change 19 (4):402−10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S., and S. Nicholson-Cole. 2009. ‘Fear won't do it’: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 30 (3):355−79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltra, C., R. Sala, R. Sola, M. Di Masso, and G. Rowe. 2010. Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4 (4):698−706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., P. Brinol, and J. Priester. 2008. Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research 2:125−64.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., and D. Wegener. 1999. The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In Dual-process theories in social psychology, ed. S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, 37−72. New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Proshansky, H. M., A. K. Fabian, and R. Kaminoff. 1983. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3 (1):57−83.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., G. Brown, and D. Weber. 2010. The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (4):422−34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L., and D. V. Dimitrova. 2011. The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy 30 (1):48−65.
   Google Scholar
• Rollero, C., and N. De Piccoli. 2010. Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (2):198−205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2010. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal Of Environmental Psychology 30 (1):1−10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2013. Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior 45 (1):60−85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K., J. P. Dillard, and F. Shen. 2013. The effects of message framing and visual image on persuasion. Communication Quarterly 61 (5):564−83.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. 2005. Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy 8 (6):637−54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, D. F. 2008. Framing in geographical analysis of environmental conflicts: Theory, methodology and three case studies. Geoforum 39 (6):2048−61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., and N. Pidgeon. 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change 20 (4):656−67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. G., and R. C. Tobin. 2011. Constraints on community engagement with Great Barrier Reef climate change reduction and mitigation. Global Environmental Change 21 (3):894−905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsung Hung, L. 2011. How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19 (7):895−915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2017, January). Climate and Energy Resources for State, Local and Tribal Governments. Retrieved from https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/local-government-climate-and-energy-strategy-series_.html#energyeff
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. and K. C. Kobrin. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education 32 (4):16−21.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U. 2010. What shapes perceptions of climate change?. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (3):332−42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., G. Seyfang, and S. O'Neill. 2011. Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public “carbon capable”? Global Environmental Change 21 (1):56−65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., and J. J. Vaske. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach, Forest Science 49 (6):830−40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worland, J. (2015, August 27). Why climate change could make hurricane impact worse. Retrieved from http://time.com/4013637/climate-change-hurricanes-impact/
   Google Scholar