Is Demonstrating the Concept of Multi-Use Too Soon for the North Sea? Barriers and Opportunities from a Stakeholder Perspective

References

• Ansong, J., E. Gissi, and H. Calado. 2017. An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process. Ocean & Coastal Management 141:65–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benassai, G., P. Mariani, C. Stenberg, and M. Christoffersen. 2014. Sustainability index of potential co-location of offshore wind farms and open water aquaculture. Ocean & Coastal Management 95:213–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth-Skyrme, R. E. 2010. Options and opportunities for marine fisheries mitigation associated with windfarms. Final report for Collaborative Offshore Wind Research into the. Environment Contract FISHMITIG09. Accessed March 10, 2017. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/5941/ei-km-in-pc-fishing-012010-options-and-opportunities-for-marinefisheries-mitigation-associated-with-windfarms.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bocci, M., S. J. Sangiuliano, A. Sarretta, J. O. Ansong, B. Buchanan, A. Kafas, M. Caña-Varona, V. Onyango, E. Papaioannou, E. Ramieri, et al. 2019. Multi-use of the sea: A wide array of opportunities from site-specific cases across Europe. PLoS ONE 14 (4):e0215010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolongaro, K. 2017. Fishermen and Wind Farms Struggle to Share the Sea. Accessed March 29. 2018. https://www.politico.eu/article/fishermen-offshore-wind-farms-struggle-to-share-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, W. J., M. Valman, and E. Björkvik. 2018. A sea of many colours – How relevant is Blue Growth for capture fisheries in the Global North, and vice versa?. Marine Policy 87:340–9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes, S. J., and M. Elliott. 2014. Marine legislation – The ultimate ‘horrendogram’: International law, European directives & national implementation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 86 (1–2):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, B. H., and R. Langan. (eds.). 2017. Aquaculture perspective of multi-use sites in the open ocean. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, B. H., G. Krause, B. Pogoda, B. Grote, L. Wever, N. Goseberg, M. F. Schupp, et al. 2017. The German Case Study: Pioneer projects of aquaculture-wind farm multi-uses. In: Aquaculture perspective of multi-use sites in the open ocean, eds. B. H. Buck., and R. Langan, 253–354. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N., K. Smyth, R. Barnes, and M. Elliott. 2014. Co-location of activities and designations: A means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning?. Marine Policy 43:254–61. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions. 2013. Opinion. Blue growth opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth COM(2012) 494 final. Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London, Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Di Tullio, G. R., P. Mariani, G. Benassai, D. Di Luccio, and L. Grieco. 2018. Sustainable use of marine resources through offshore wind and mussel farm co-location. Ecological Modelling 367:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvere, F. 2008. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy 32 (5):762–71. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, R. W. 2012. Marine spatial planning: Managing a dynamic environment. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (1):67–79. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.664406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECORYS. 2014. Study on Blue Growth and Maritime Policy within the EU North Sea Region and the English Channel. Final Report FWC MARE/2012/06–SC E1/2012/01. Accessed January 13, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eikeset, A. M., A. B. Mazzarella, B. Davíðsdóttir, D. H. Klinger, S.A. Levin, E. Rovenskaya, and N. C. Stenseth. 2018. What is blue growth? The semantics of “Sustainable Development” of marine environments. Marine Policy 87:177–9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENTSO-E. 2017. The ten-year network development plan and regional investment plans. Accessed February 19, 2019. https://www.entsoe.eu/about-entso-e/system-development/the-north-seas-countries-offshore-grid-initiative-nscogi/Pages/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. The Ocean of tomorrow projects (2010‑2013) - Joint Research Forces to meet challenges in ocean management. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environmental Agency). 2015. The European environment — state and outlook 2015 A comprehensive assessment of the European environment’s state, trends and prospects, in a global context. Accessed May 11, 2018 https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A. M., P. I. Macreadie, D. O. B. Jones, and D. J. Booth. 2014. A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure. Ocean & Coastal Management 87:20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, K. 2010. Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast. Land Use Policy 27 (2):185–94. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, K., and A. Kannen. 2011. Vision 2030: Towards the sustainable planning of the Baltic sea. BaltseaPlan. Hamburg: Baltic Sea Region Programme 2006-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, T., and M. Austen. 2014. The co-location of offshore windfarms and decapod fisheries in the UK: Constraints and opportunities. Marine Policy 43:295– 300. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICES. 2018. Report of the Workshop on Co-existence and Synergies in Marine Spatial Planning 661 (WKCSMP) in Edinburgh, Scotland. Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Jagerroos, S., and P.R. Krause. 2016. Rigs-to-reef; impact or enhancement on marine biodiversity. Journal of Ecosystem and Ecography 6:187.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, H. M., S. C. D. Burg, B. Bolman, R. G. Jak, P. Kamermans, M. Poelman, and M. Stuiver. 2016. The feasibility of offshore aquaculture and its potential for multi-use in the North Sea. Aquaculture International 24 (3):735–56. doi: 10.1007/s10499-016-9987-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, S., G. Ellis, and S. Kidd. 2012. Marine spatial planning: A new frontier? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14 (1):1–5. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.664327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., and D. Huitema. 2014. Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change 29:387–94. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafas, A., P. Donohue, I. Davies, and B. E. Scott. 2018. Displacement of existing activities. In: Offshore energy and marine spatial planning, ed. K. L. Yates, and C. J. A. Bradshaw, 88–112. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogeri, C., G. Galanis, C. Spyrou, D. Diamantis, F. Baladima, M. Koukoula, and G. Kallos. 2017. Assessing the European OW and wave energy resource for combined exploitation. Renewable Energy. 101:244–64. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannen, A. 2014. Challenges for marine spatial planning in the context of multiple sea uses, policy arenas and actors based on experiences from the German North Sea. Regional Environmental Change 14 (6):2139–50. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0349-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. H., A. M. Eikeset, B. Davíðsdóttir, A.-M. Winter, and J. R. Watson. 2018. The mechanics of blue growth: Management of oceanic natural resource use with multiple, interacting sectors. Marine Policy 87:356–62. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koundouri, P (ed.). 2014. The ocean of tomorrow. Investment assessment of multi-use of offshoreplatforms: Methodology and applications, vol. 1. Cham, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazi, Z. 2018. From identification of compatibilities and conflicts to reaching marine spatial allocation agreements. Review of actions required and relevant tools and processes. Ocean & Coastal Management 166:103–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legorburu, I., K. R. Johnson, and S. A. Kerr. 2018. Multi-use maritime platforms - North Sea oil and offshore wind: Opportunity and risk. Ocean & Coastal Management 160 (15):75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.044.
   Google Scholar
• Marine Scotland. 2015. Scotland’s National Marine Plan - A single framework for managing our seas. Accessed March 10, 2019. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0047/00475466.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs. 2015. National Water Plan 2016-2021. The Hague, NL: Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
   Google Scholar
• MMO (Marine Management Organisation). 2013. Potential for co-location of activities in marine plan areas. A report produced for the Marine Management Organisation. MMO Project No1010.
   Google Scholar
• North Sea Commission. 2016. North Sea Region 2020 Strategy. Gothenburg, Sweden: CPMR North Sea Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. 2013. Integrated management of the marine environment of the North Sea and Skagerrak (Management Plan). Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Ocean Energy Forum. 2016. Ocean energy strategic roadmap 2016: Building ocean energy for Europe. Brussels: Ocean Energy Forum.
   Google Scholar
• OGA (Oil and Gas Authority). 2018. Decommissioning strategy. Accessed March 13, 2019. https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/media/1020/oga_decomm_strategy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OSPAR. 2010. Quality status report 2010. OSPAR Commission. Accessed September 22, 2018. https://qsr2010.ospar.org/en/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2002. Critical thinking. New York, Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, N. 2009. Maritime spatial planning: About the sustainable management of the use of our seas and oceans. In: Understanding and strengthening European Union-Canada relations in law of the sea and ocean governance, eds. T. Koivurova, A. Chircop, E. Franckx, E. J. Molenaar, and D. L. Vanderzwaag. Rovaniemi: Finland University of Lapland Printing Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Schupp, M.F., and B.H. Buck. 2017. Case study 1c: Multi-use of offshore windfarms with marine aquaculture and fisheries (German North Sea EEZ – North Sea). Edinburgh: MUSES Project. Accessed May 10, 2019. https://sites.dundee.ac.uk/muses/wp-content/uploads/sites/70/2018/02/ANNEX-3-CASE-STUDY-1C.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scotland Food and Drink. 2018. Aquaculture Growth to 2030 – A Strategic Plan for Framing Scotland’s seas. Scotland Food and Drink, Edinburgh. Accessed March 22, 2019. http://scottishsalmon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/aquaculture-growth-to-2030.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stuiver, M., K. Soma, P. Koundouri, S. van den Burg, A. Gerritsen, T. Harkamp, N. Dalsgaard, F. Zagonari, R. Guanche, J.-J. Schouten, et al. 2016. The Governance of multi-use platforms at sea for energy production and aquaculture: Challenges for policy makers in European seas. Sustainability 8 (4):333–19. doi: 10.3390/su8040333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toke, D. 2011. The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy? Energy Policy 39 (2):526–34. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Koningsveld, M. 2017. Eco-friendly design of scour protection: Potential enhancement of ecological functioning in offshore wind farms. Towards an implementation guide and experimental set-up. Accessed September 22, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315589657_Eco-96friendly_design_of_scour_protection_potential_enhancement_of_ecological_functioning_in_offshore_wind_farms_Towards_an_implementation_guide_and_experimental_set-up.
   Google Scholar
• Wizelius, T. 2007. Developing wind power projects: Theory and practice. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• World Atlas. 2017. Accessed March 11, 2018. https://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/infopage/northsea.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. 2019. Can classical location theory apply to sea space? In Maritime spatial planning, past, present, future, eds. J. Zaucha, and K. Gee. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., M. Bocci, D. Depellegrin, L. I. B. Buck, M. Schupp, M. Caña-Varona, B. Buchanan, A. Kovacheva, and P. K. Karachle. 2017. Analytical Framework (AF) – Analysing Multi-Use (MU) in the European Sea Basins. Edinburgh: MUSES project.
   Google Scholar