Implementing Active Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course

REFERENCES

• Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse in Higher Education. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED340272).
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1961. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review 31:21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, A., and I. Vardi. 2001. Why use the online environment with face-to-face students? Insights from early adopters. Proceedings from ASCILITE, Melbourne, Australia. Available online at http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/bunkera.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burbach, M. E., G. S. Matkin, and S. M. Fritz. 2004. Teaching critical thinking in an introductory leadership course utilizing active learning strategies: A confirmatory study. College Student Journal 28 (3): 482–493.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. 1998. Teaching strategies to foster “deep” versus “surface” learning. Teaching Options. Centre for University Teaching, University of Ottawa. Available online at http://www.uottawa.ca/academic/cut/options/Nov_98/Teaching Strategies_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Caracelli, V. J., and J. C. Greene. 1993. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Education and Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15 (2): 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L. 1985. Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., A. A. Darabi, and L. J. Smith. 2007. Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education 28 (1): 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., and B. C. McEwen. 2007. Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education 21 (3): 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C., K. Cagiltay, B.-R. Lim, J. Craner, and T. M. Duffy. 2001. Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses. The Technology Source Archives, March–April. Available online at http://technologysource.org/article/seven_principles_of_effective_teaching/
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L., R. H. Starr, L. Teles, and M. Turnoff. 1997. Learning networks: A field guide to leaching and learning online. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hidayat, L., S. Patel, and K. Veltri. 2012. Active-learning implementation in an advanced elective course on infectious diseases. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 76 (5): 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy, Y. 2008. An empirical development of critical value factors (CVF) of online learning activities: An application of activity theory and cognitive value theory. Computers and Education 51 (4): 1664–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofland, J., and L. H. Lofland. 1995. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and C. Teddlie. 2003. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 351–383. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. L. 1999. The No Significant Difference Phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P. J., C. S. Li, and A. Pickett. 2006. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education 9 (3): 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. 2006. Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education 20 (2): 65–77.
   Google Scholar