1,006
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Collaborative Instructional Strategies to Enhance Knowledge Convergence

REFERENCES

  • Cañas, A. J., G. Hill, and J. Lott. 2003. Support for constructing knowledge models in Cmap Tools. Technical Report No. IHMC Cmap Tools 2003-02. Pensacola FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
  • De Lisi, R., and S. L. Goldbeck. 1999. Implication of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, ed. A. M. O’Donnell and A. King, 3–37. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Draper, D. C. 2010. The instructional effects of knowledge-based community of practice learning environments on student achievement and knowledge convergence. Ph.D. diss. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. UMI No. 3436066.
  • Gowin, D. B. 1981. Educating. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Halpern, D. F. 1998. Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist 53:449–455.
  • Halpern, D. F. 1999. Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and depositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 80:69–74.
  • Halpern, D. F. 2004. A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13 (4): 135–139.
  • Halpern, D. F. 2014. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking, 5th ed. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Hewitt, J., and M. Scardamalia. 1998. Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1): 75–96.
  • Jeong, H., and M. Chi. 2007. Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science 35:287–315.
  • Lage, M. J., G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31 (1): 30–43.
  • Monereo, C. 2009. Evaluating authenticity. In Authentic assessment in secondary and university education, ed. M. Castelló, 9–22. Barcelona: Edebé, Innova Universitas.
  • Novak, J. D., and A. J. Cañas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report No. IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Available online at http://cmap.ihmc.us/
  • Novak, J. D., and D. B. Gowin. 1984. Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Novak, J. D., D. B. Gowin, and G. T. Johansen. 1983. The use of concept mapping and knowledge Vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education 67 (5): 625–645.
  • Renaud, R. D., and H. G. Murray. 2008. A comparison of a subject-specific and a general measure of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity 3:85–93.
  • Scardamalia, M. 2002. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Liberal education in a knowledge society, ed. B. Smeth, 67–98. Chicago: Open Court.
  • Schwen, T., and N. Hara. 2003. Community of practice: A metaphor for online design? The Information Society 19 (3): 257–270.
  • Teasley, S. 1997. Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, 361–384. Berlin: Springer.
  • Thompson, L., and G. A. Fine. 1999. Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality & Social Psychology Review 3 (4): 278–302.
  • Weinberger, A., K. Stegmann, and F. Fischer. 2007. Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction 17 (4): 416–426.
  • Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zhang, J., M. Scardamalia, M. Lamon, R. Messina, and R. Reeve. 2007. Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of nine- and ten-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development 55:117–145.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.