An Empirical Evaluation of Distance Learning’s Effectiveness in the K–12 Setting

REFERENCES

• Archambault, L., and K. Crippen. 2009. K–12 distance educators at work: Who’s teaching online across the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41 (4): 363–391.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. K. 2008. Secondary students’ perceptions of web-based learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 9 (4): 357–371.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Researching K-12 online learning: What do we know and what should we examine? Distance Learning 7 (2): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. K., and T. C. Reeves. 2009. The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education 52 (2): 402–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. 2007. The first time “everything changed.” Phi Delta Kappa 89 (2): 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C. 2009. Effectiveness of cyber charter schools: A review of research on learnings. TechTrends 53 (4): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C. S., M. K. Barbour, and T. Clark. 2009. Research and practice in K–12 online learning: A review of open access literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, C., K. J. Gillan, J. Bosnick, M. Hess, and H. Scott. 2005. Succeeding at the gateway: Secondary algebra learning in the virtual world. Jacksonville, FL: University of North Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, G., and S. Nelson. 2011. The impact of annual yearly progress on middle school principals’ job satisfaction. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal 28 (2): 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Forte, E. 2010. Examining the assumptions underlying the NCLB federal accountability policy on school improvement. Educational Psychologist 45 (2): 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huett, J., L. Moller, W. R. Foshay, and C. Coleman. 2008. The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web. TechTrends 52 (5): 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Maleyko, G., and M. A. Gawlik. 2011. No Child Left Behind: What we know and what we need to know. Education 131 (3): 600–624.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. M., A. Carr-Chellman, and B. R. Sockman. 2009. Selecting silicon: Why parents choose cyber charter schools. TechTrends 53 (4): 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2008. Percentage and number of all public schools not making Adequate Yearly Progress, by state: 2011. Available online at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab1_2.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W., and H. Nicholas. 2010. A progressive pedagogy for online learning with high-ability secondary school students: A case study. The Gifted Child Quarterly 54 (3): 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., J. Osborne, R. Patel, and G. Kleiman. 2009. Issues surrounding the deployment of a new statewide virtual public school. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 10 (1): 37–49, 90–91.
   Google Scholar
• Payne-Tsoupros, C. 2010. No Child Left Behind: Disincentives to focus instruction on students above the passing threshold. Journal of Law and Education 39 (4): 471–501.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, K. M., Y. Aqui, and L. G. Putney. 2009. Evaluation of an evolving virtual high school. Educational Media International 46 (4): 281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Repetto, J., C. Cavanaugh, N. Wayer, and F. Liu. 2010. Virtual high schools: Improving outcomes for students with disabilities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 11 (2): 91–104, 145–146.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. L. 2006. A comprehensive look at distance education in the K–12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 (4): 425–448.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, S. 2010. Is e-learning really working? The trillion-dollar question. IEEE Internet Computing 14 (2): 78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. 2010. Assessment versus achievement: Winner takes all! Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy 3 (2): 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. L. 2010. Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics 21 (4): 662–712.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative of educational reform. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 2008. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. PL 107–110. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Available online at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. n.d. Part A—Improving basic programs operated by local educational agencies/Subpart 1—Basic program requirements/Sec. 1111—State plans. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg2.html#sec1111
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, S. Y., D. M. Browder, I. Meier, and A. McColl. 2007. The implications of No Child Left Behind for students with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 13 (2): 143–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace, P. 2009. Distance learning for gifted students: Outcomes for elementary, middle, and high school aged students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 32 (3): 295–320.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. L., and D. Smith. 2010. Meeting the needs of gifted students through online programs. Distance Learning 7 (2): 43–50.
   Google Scholar