614
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Student Misbehaviors in Online Classrooms: Scale Development and Validation

&

REFERENCES

  • Beaudoin, M. F. 2002. Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. Internet and Higher Education 5 (2): 147–55.
  • Bryant, F. B., and P. R. Yarnold. 1995. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Reading and understanding multivariate statistics, ed. L. G. Grimm and P. R. Yarnold, 99–136. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Chaiken, S., and A. H. Eagly. 1983. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 241–265.
  • Diaz, D. P., and R. B. Cartnal. 1999. Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching 47 (4): 130–135.
  • DiBiase, D., and K. Kidwai. 2010. Wasted on the young? Comparing the performance and attitudes of younger and older U.S. adults in an online class on geographic information. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34 (3): 299–326.
  • Dreikurs, R., B. B. Grunwald, and F. C. Pepper. 1971. Maintaining sanity in the classroom: Illustrated teaching techniques. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Durmuscelebi, M. 2008. Investigating students’ misbehavior in classroom management in state and private primary schools with a comparative approach. Education 130 (3): 377–383.
  • Freestone, O., and V. Mitchell. 2004. Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and Internet-related misbehaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2): 121–128.
  • Frymier, A. B., and M. L. Houser. 1999. The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies 50 (1): 1–12.
  • Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Goodboy, A. K. 2011. The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education 60 (4): 422–440.
  • Hooker, J., and K. Denker. 2014. The Learning Loss Scale as an assessment tool: An empirical examination of convergent validity with performative measures. Communication Teacher 28 (2): 130–143.
  • Hsu, C. 2012. The influence of vocal qualities and confirmation of nonnative English-speaking teachers on student receiver apprehension, affective learning, and cognitive learning. Communication Education 61 (1): 4–16.
  • Johanson, G. A., and G. P. Brooks. 2009. Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 70 (3): 1–7.
  • Kearney, P., T. G. Plax, E. R. Hays, and M. J. Ivey. 1991. College teacher misbehaviors: What students don’t like about what teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly 39 (4): 309–324.
  • Kearney, P., T. G. Plax, V. P. Richmond, and J. C. McCroskey. 1985. Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education 34 (1): 19–28.
  • Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Knowles, M. S., E. F. Holton, and R. A. Swanson, 2005. The adult learner. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Krathwohl, D. R., B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. New York: David McKay.
  • Lei, L. W. 2004. Evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in histology. Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Lim, C. K. 2001. Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education 15 (2): 41–51.
  • Lowes, S. 2005. Online teaching and classroom change: The impact of virtual high school on its teachers and their schools. Available online at http://www.academia.edu/1106534/Online_teaching_and_classroom_change_The_impact_of_Virtual_High_School_on_its_teachers_and_their_schools
  • MacCallum, R. C., M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1 (2): 130–149.
  • McCroskey, J. C. 1994. Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks, ed. S. Morreale and M. Brooks, 55–68. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
  • McCroskey, J. C., and V. P. Richmond. 1992. Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, ed. V. P. Richmond and J. C. McCroskey, 101–119. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McCroskey, J. C., V. P. Richmond, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney. 1985. Power in the classroom: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education 34:214–226.
  • McCroskey, J. C., and T. J. Young. 1979. The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research 5 (4): 375–382.
  • Meyer, K. R. 2007. Student engagement in the classroom: An examination of student silence and participation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, November, Chicago, IL.
  • Meyer, K. R. 2008. Student classroom engagement: A multiple linear regression analysis of the variables predicting student silence and participation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, November, San Diego, CA.
  • Meyers, L. S., G. Gamst, and A. J. Guarino. 2006. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nagel, L. L., A. S. Blignaut, and J. C. Cronjé. 2009. Read-only participants: A case for student communication in online classes. Interactive Learning Environments 17 (1): 37–51.
  • Patchin, J., and S. Hinduja. 2006. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 4 (2): 148–169.
  • Patil, V. H., S. N. Singh, S. Mishra, and D. D. Donavan. 2008. Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the “eigenvalue greater than one” criterion. Journal of Business Research 61 (2): 162–170.
  • Plax, T. G., and P. Kearney. 1990. Classroom management: Structuring the classroom for work. In Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods, ed. J. Daly, G. Friedrich, and A. Vangelisti, 223–236. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Plax, T. G., P. Kearney, J. C. McCroskey, and V. P. Richmond. 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education 35 (1): 43–55.
  • Plax, T. G., P. Kearney, and L. K. Tucker. 1986. Prospective teachers’ use of behavior alteration techniques on common student misbehaviors. Communication Education 35:32–42.
  • Rocco, E., and M. Warglien. 1995. Computer mediated communication and the emergence of electronic opportunism. Available online at http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/34/1/CEEL96_01.pdf
  • Seidman, A. 2005. The learning killer: Disruptive student behavior in the classroom. Reading Improvement 42 (1): 40–46.
  • Selwyn, N. 2008. A safe haven for misbehaving? An investigation of online misbehavior among university students. Social Science Computer Review 26 (4): 446–465.
  • Stephens, K., M. Houser, and R. Cowan. 2009. R U able to meat me: The impact of students’ overly casual email messages to instructors. Communication Education 58 (3): 303–326.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.