Mentoring and Student Support in Online Doctoral Programs

References

• Bierema, L. L., and S. B. Merriam. 2002. E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education 26 (3):211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Boehe, D. M. 2016. Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher Education 41 (3):399–414. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C. 1999. The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision 39 (1):46–52. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb01789.x
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ensher, E. A., C. Heun, and A. Blanchard. 2003. Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63:264–88. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensher, E. A., and S. E. Murphy. 2007. E-mentoring: Next generation research strategies and suggestions. In The handbook of mentoring at work, ed. B. R. Ragins and K. E. Kram, 299–322. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erichsen, E. A., D. U. Bolliger, and C. Halupa. 2014. Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education 39 (2):321–38. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, A., and B. Arvidsson. 2011. Research supervisors’ different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education 36 (1):7–19. doi:10.1080/03075070903402151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2 (2/3):87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. 2002. Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., and M. Koro-Ljungberg. 2011. Dialogic exchanges and the negotiation of differences: Female graduate students’ experiences of obstacles related to academic mentoring. Qualitative Report 16 (3):682–710. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR (accessed June 5, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. B., and J. M. Huwe. 2003. Getting mentored in graduate school. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., M. L. Johnson and T. Hardemon. 2013. Dissertations at a Distance: Students’ perceptions of Online Mentoring in a Doctoral Program. Journal of Distance Education 27 (1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835/1481
   Google Scholar
• Kung, M., and T. J. Logan. 2014. An overview of online and hybrid doctoral degree programs in educational technology. TechTrends 58 (4):16–18. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0764-3
   Google Scholar
• Lechuga, V. M. 2011. Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education 62 (6):757–71. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9416-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education 33 (3):267–81. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., M. Brennan, and B. Green. 2009. Re‐imagining doctoral education: Professional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research & Development 28 (3):275–87. doi:10.1080/07294360902839883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. 1973. Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education 44:661–79. doi:10.2307/1980599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. E. 1994. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., D. J. Shernoff, and C. H. Hooker. 2009. Good mentoring: Fostering excellent practice in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nettles, M. T., and C. M. Millett. 2006. Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. L. 2003. Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale. Research in Higher Education 44 (4):473–94. doi:10.1023/A:1024289000849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schichtel, M. 2010. Core-competence skills in e-mentoring for medical educators: A conceptual exploration. Medical Teacher 32 (7):e248–62. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.489126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., and T. Bidjerano. 2010. Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education 55 (4):1721–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar