A comparison of scholarly productivity among current professors who obtained terminal degrees

References

• Abbott, A., Cyranoski, D., Jones, N., Maher, B., Schiermeier, Q., & Van Noorden, R. (2010). Metrics: Do metrics matter? Nature News, 465(7300), 860–862. doi:10.1038/465860a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2005). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 71–85. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_2
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Defleur, M. H., & Heald, G. R. (2007). The acceptability of credentials earned online for obtaining employment in the health care professions. Communication Education, 56(3), 292–307. doi:10.1080/03634520701344959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D., & Goodyear, P. (2005). Implications of external research quality assessment for local research leadership: Learning from the UK RAE experience. In P. Jeffrey (Ed.), Quality in educational research: directions in policy and practice: Proceedings for the AARE 2005 Conference. Canberra, Austrailia: AARE.
   Google Scholar
• Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, L. L. (1986). What characterizes a productive research department?. Research in Higher Education, 25(3), 211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, B. M., Calles-Escandon, J., Hairston, K. G., Langdon, S. E., Latham-Sadler, B. A., & Bell, R. A. (2013). Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 88(4). doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Seaquist, E., Pacala, J. T., Center, B., & Finstad, D. (2002). One school’s strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, 77(5), 368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaparte, I., Augustus, A., & Okoro, E. (2014). Challenges facing beginning faculty in the 21st century higher education: Evaluating research productivity, teaching effectiveness, and service. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(1), 143–162. doi:10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i1/1622
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B, & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A, Boud, D, & Namgung, S. U. (2011). Influences on the formation of academics: the role of the doctorate and structured development opportunities. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 51–66. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogan, H. O. (1961). The duties of the professor. Improving College and University Teaching, 9(3), 104–105. doi:10.1080/00193089.1961.10534161
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundations for the Advancement of Teaching. (2001). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education, 2010 edition. Menlo Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J. D., Topp, R., Smith, C. E., Cohen, M. Z., Fahrenwald, N., Zerwic, J. J., Benefield, L. E., and Anderson, C. M., Conn, V. S. (2013). Time management strategies for research productivity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(2), 155–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J. Y, & Petrick, J. (2011). Doctoral Students' research productivity: An analysis of publications in tourism and hospitality journals. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education (Pre-2012), 10(1), 63.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1), 59–70. doi:10.1080/03797720701618880
   Google Scholar
• Columbaro, N. L. (2009). e-Mentoring possibilities for online doctoral students: A literature review. Adult Learning, 20(3–4), 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 1985. Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and social sciences (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cronan-Hillix, T., Gensheimer, L. K., Cronan-Hillix, W. A., & Davidson, W. S. (1986). Students’ views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teaching of Psychology, 13(3), 123–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan, D. E, & Hyle, A. E. (2009). Assistant to “full”: Rank and the development of expertise. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 443–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, C. (1994). Researching teacher-research: A practitioner’s retrospective. English Education, 26(2), 86–124.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, J. C., & Baltzer, H. (2006). Hiring technical education faculty: Vacancies, criteria, and attitudes toward online doctoral degrees. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 43(3), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gregorutti, G. (2010). Moving from a predominantly teaching oriented research culture to a research productivity mission: The case of Mexico and the United States. Excellence in Higher Education, 1, 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Guendoo, L. M. 2007. Credibility challenges to online doctoral graduates seeking faculty positions: A community college perspective. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh. doi: 10.5195/ehe.2010.17
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, N., Haug, R., & Krabbenhoft, A. (2005). The self-fulfilling prophesy of the tenure/promotion policies at business colleges and schools. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(1), 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hermanowicz, J. C. (2016). Faculty perceptions of their graduate education. Higher Education, 72(3), 291–305. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. S. (2017). The need for narrative reflection and experiential learning in medical education: A lesson learned through an urban indigenous health elective. Medical Teaching, 39(9), 995–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(1), 38–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, M. A., Ford, M. E., & Thompson, C. M. (2004). Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 385–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., & Turner, L. (2005). Measurement and explanation of the intensity of co-publication in scientific research: An analysis at the laboratory level. w11172, Version 2. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzon-Garcia, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists: Case study of Spanish University researchers in Geology. Scientometrics, 55(3), 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middaugh, M. F. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. (2003). Action Research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2012). Research & development, innovations, and the science and engineering workforce: A comparison to science and engineering indicators 2012. NSB-12-03. Arlington, WA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palepu, A, Friedman, R. H, Barnett, R. C, Carr, P. L, Ash, A. S, Szalacha, L, & Moskowitz, M. A. (1998). Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in us medical schools. academic medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 73(3), 318–323.
   Google Scholar
• Rawat, S., & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(2), 87–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadlak, J. (2011). Ranking in higher education: Its place and impact. In The Europa World of Learning, 2010. (60th edition), Vol 1. London, UK: Routledge..
   Google Scholar
• Seibold, K. N. 2007. Employers’ perceptions of online education. Ph.D. diss., Oklahoma State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P. (2006) Working in a ‘new’ university: in the shadow of the Research Assessment Exercise? Studies in Higher Education, 31(5),555–568. doi:10.1080/03075070600922758
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., Barnacle, R., & Cuthbert, D. (2014). How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: What the research tells us. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1972–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeels, J., & Fairbanks, R. (1968). Publish or Perish: An analysis of mobility of publishing and nonpublishing economists. Southern Economic Journal, 35(1), 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, P. L. (2001). Toward a theory of genre in teacher research: Contributions from a reflective practitioner. English Education, 3, 100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien, F. F., & Blackburn, R. T. (1996). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, K. (2011). Measuring faculty productivity. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K., & Harris, S. (2012). Mentoring doctoral students in educational leadership programs. In S. J. Fletcher & C. A. Mullen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education (pp. 339–353). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar