Responsibilities of Online Teachers and On-Site Facilitators in Online High School Courses

References

• Archambault, L. (2010). Identifying and addressing teaching challenges in K-12 online environments. Distance Learning, 7(2), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. K., & Hill, J. (2011). What are they doing and how are they doing it? Rural student experiences in virtual schooling. Journal of Distance Education, 25(1). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/725/1248
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J. (2018). On-site and online facilitators: Current and future direction for research. In K. Kennedy & R. Ferdig (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (2nd ed., pp. 423–442). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/etcpress/82/
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 793–806. doi:10.1111/bjet.12089
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., & Stevens, M. A. (2016). Parents’ perceptions of teacher support at a cyber charter high school. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 227–246.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Close, D. (2009). Fair grades. Teaching Philosophy, 32(4), 361–398. doi:10.5840/teachphil200932439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., Jordan, A. W., Hannum, W. H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education, 35(3), 324–344. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/751/1285
   Google Scholar
• Fluke, S., Olson, A., & Peterson, R. L. (2014). Detention. Lincoln, NE: Building & Sustaining Student Engagement. Retrieved from http://k12engagement.unl.edu/Briefs/Detention/Detention 2-9-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freidhoff, J. R., Borup, J., Stimson, R. J., & DeBruler, K. (2015). Documenting and sharing the work of successful on-site mentors. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/798843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannum, W. H., Irvin, M. J., Lei, P., & Farmer, T. W. (2008). Effectiveness of using learner‐centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools. Distance Education, 29(3), 211–229. doi:10.1080/01587910802395763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1 & 2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/016/1/01611.HTML
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2012). “Everybody is their own island”: Teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 124–144. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.967
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, N., & Degner, K. (2016). Supporting online AP students: The rural facilitator and considerations for training. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 133–144. doi:10.1080/08923647.2016.1198194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, J., de la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., & Hannum, W. (2008). Learner-centered social support: Enhancing online distance education for underserved rural high school students in the United States. In N. Whitton & M. McPherson (Eds.), Research proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology Conference (pp. 39–48). University of Leeds, England: Association for Learning Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K., Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, K. (2013). Preservice teachers’ experience in a virtual school. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.756757
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, I. M., Brantley-Dias, L., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2016). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention of online teachers in the K-12 setting. Online Learning, 20(3), 26–52. doi:10.24059/olj.v20i3.986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lowes, S., Lin, P., & Kinghorn, B. (2015). Exploring the link between online behaviours and course performance in asynchronous online high school courses. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2, 169–194. doi:10.18608/jla.2015.22.13
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2014). 5-O-A: Virtual learning, distance learning, & independent study. In Pupil accounting manual (pp. 5-O-A-1 – 5-O-A-5). Lansing, MI: Author. Retrieved from http://mi.gov/documents/5O-VirtualHS-DistLearn-ing_41466_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Public Act § No. 60. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.legislature.mi.gov/docu- ments/2013-2014/publicact/htm/2013-PA-0060.htm
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1061–1072. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, L. M., Carey, R., & Kleiman, G. (2007). A study of the effectiveness of the Louisiana Algebra I online course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 289–306. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782484
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2016). Using situational interest to enhance individual interest and science-related behaviours. Research in Science Education, 2002, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pettyjohn, T. J. (2012). Stakeholders’ perceptions of supplemental online learning for credit recovery. Georgia Southern University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1402&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Quilici, S. B., & Joki, R. (2011). Investigating roles of online school principals. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 141–160. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782583
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online programs. The Phi Delta Kappan, 88(1), 31–36. doi:10.1177/003172170608800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., Davis, L., Mills, S. C., Marshall, J., & Pape, L. (2008). Toward practical procedures for predicting and promoting success in virtual school students. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 90–109. doi:10.1080/08923640802039040
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.emerging-models.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Clements, P., Heppen, J., Rickles, J., Sorensen, N., Walters, K., … Micheiman, V. (2016). Getting back on track the role of in-person instructional support for students taking online credit recovery. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/system/files/downloads/report/Role-of-In-Person-Instructional-Support-Online-Credit-Recovery-Algebra-April-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2007). Laboratories of reform: Virtual high schools and innovation in public education. Washington, D.C.: Education Sector. Retrieved from https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/publications/28154.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Evaluating online learning: Challenges and strategies for success. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/academic/evalonline/evalonline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2013). Caring in a technology-mediated online high school context. Distance Education, 34(1), 97–118. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transformative qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar