Online Student Privacy in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Research

References

• Studies included in the systematic review denoted by *
   Google Scholar
• *Avuglah, B. K., Owusu-Ansah, C. M., Tachie-Donkor, G., & Yeboah, E. B. (2020). Privacy issues in libraries with online services: Attitudes and concerns of Academic Librarians and University Students in Ghana. College and Research Libraries, 81(6), 997–1020. doi:10.5860/crl.81.6.997x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, S., & de Jong, M. (2017). The privacy paradox–Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Caines, A., & Glass, E. (2019). Education before regulation: Empowering students to question their data privacy. New Horizons, 94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Electronic Privacy Information Center. (2021). Re-identification. Retrieved from https://epic.org/privacy/reidentification/#intro
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, N., Gerber, P., & Volkamer, M. (2018). Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Computers & Security, 77, 226–261. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hong, F. ‐. Y., & Chiu, S. ‐. L. (2016). Factors influencing Facebook usage and Facebook addictive tendency in university students: The role of online psychological privacy and Facebook usage motivation. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 117–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G. (2015). Successful failure: What Foucault can teach us about privacy self-management in a world of Facebook and big data. Ethics of Information Technology, 17(2), 89–101. doi:10.1007/s10676-015-9363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jones, K. M. (2019). Learning analytics and higher education: A proposed model for establishing informed consent mechanisms to promote student privacy and autonomy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0155-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jones, K. M., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020). “We’re being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 1044–1059. doi:10.1002/asi.24358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitowska, A., Shulman, Y., Martucci, L., & Wastlund, E. (2020). Psychological effects and their role in online privacy interactions: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 21236–21260. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2969562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. (2014). Ethical issues in the Big Data industry. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(2), 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2008). Defining Privacy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 411–428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, S., Dey, B., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Analysis of factors that influence customers’ willingness to leave big data digital footprints on social media: A systematic review of literature. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 559–576. doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9802-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ndumbaro, R. C., & Mutula, S. M. (2020). Library professionals’ awareness of information ethics in the provision of library and information services in University Libraries in Tanzania. Journal of Information Ethics, 29(1), 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, policy and integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• *Odeyinde, O. B. (2013). Information privacy concerns of undergraduate students in a Nigerian university and their willingness to provide personal information to transact on the internet [Dissertation, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Schrameyer, A. R., Graves, T. M., Hua, D. M., & Brandt, N. C. (2016). Online student collaboration and FERPA considerations. TechTrends, 60(6), 540–548. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0117-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Singh, D., & Ramutsheli, M. P. (2016). Student data protection in a South African ODL university context: Risks, challenges and lessons from comparative jurisdictions. Distance Education, 37(2), 164–179. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276–288. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridhuan M., Dangi, T., Tajuddin, N & Bahsri, N. (2017). Data security, control and privacy management of Facebook usage among undergraduate students. ESTEEM Academic Journal, 12, 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Soumelidou, A., & Tsohou, A. (2021). Towards the creation of a profile of the information privacy aware user through a systematic literature review of information privacy awareness. In Telematics and Informatics, 61.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. (2002). Privacy and Autonomy: A Reappraisal. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40(4), 587–604. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2002.tb01918.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thompson, J. (2011). Communication privacy management in college athletics: Exploring privacy dilemmas in the athletic/academic advisor student-athlete interpersonal relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Management. doi:10.3172/JIE.20.1.34
   Google Scholar
• *Walton, A. L., DeVaney, S. A., & Sandall, D. L. (2011). Graduate students’ perceptions of privacy and closed circuit television systems in public settings. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 7(3), 50–69. doi:10.4018/jthi.2011070104
   Google Scholar
• *Yang, K. C., Pulido, A., & Kang, Y. (2016). Exploring the relationship between privacy concerns and social media use among college students: A communication privacy management perspective. Intercultural Communication Studies, 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences. (2017). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 3.0. Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Xie, W., & Karan, K. (2019). Consumers’ privacy concern and privacy protection on social network sites in the era of big data: Empirical evidence from college students. Journal of Interactive Advertising. doi:10.1080/15252019.2019.1651681
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F., & Wang, S. (2014). Students’ perception toward personal information and privacy disclosure in e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 207–216.
   Google Scholar