318
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Impact of Video Feedback on Student Assessments and Performance

, , , &

References

  • Borup, J., West, R. E., Thomas, R. A., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 232–256. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1821
  • Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Education Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 161–184. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8
  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  • Bunge, N. (2018, November 27). Students evaluating teachers doesn’t just hurt teachers. It hurts students. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Students-Evaluating-Teachers/245169
  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
  • Chew, E. (2014). “To listen or to read?” Audio or written assessment feedback for international students in the UK. On the Horizon, 22(2), 127–135. doi:10.1108/oth-07-2013-0026
  • Cole, J. E., & Kritzer, J. B. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36–40. doi:10.1177/875687050902800406
  • Crim, S. J. (2006). An examination of social presence in an online learning environment. [ Doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville]. doi:10.18297/etd/291
  • Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., … Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386–396. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.025
  • Esterhazy, R., & Damsa, C. Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education. 44(2), 260–274. 2017, August. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
  • Gannon, K. (2018, May 6). In defense (sort of) of student evaluations of teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/In-Defense-Sort-of-of/243325
  • Garrison, D. R. 2007, April. Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Synchronous Learning Networks, 111, 61–72.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2009). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  • Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428985
  • Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437–456. doi:10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
  • Griffiths, M. E., & Graham, C. R. (2009). The potential of asynchronous video in online education. Distance Education, 6(2), 13–22.
  • Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. doi:10.1080/08923649709526970
  • Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
  • Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51–66. doi:10.14742/ajet.1878
  • Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 77–86. Retrieved 18th September 2018. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/132721/
  • Hyde, E. (2013). Talking results – Trialing an audio-visual feedback methods for e-submissions. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 1(3).
  • Jones, N., Georghiades, P., & Gunson, J. (2012, November). Student feedback via screen capture digital video: Stimulating student’s modified action. Higher Education, 64(5), 593–607. 10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7
  • Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction, and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603
  • Ketchum, C., LaFave, D., Yeats, C., Phompheng, E., & Hardy, J. (2020). Video-based feedback on student work: An investigation into the instructor experience, workload, and student evaluations. Online Learning, 24(3), 85–105. doi:10.24059/olj.v24i3.2194
  • Killingback, C., Ahmed, O., & Williams, J. (2019). ‘It was all in your voice’ - Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and screencast): A qualitative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.012
  • Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance education higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005
  • Lamey, A. (2015). The philosopher as teacher. Video feedback in philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 46(4–5), 691–702. doi:10.1111/meta.12155
  • Lawrence, J. (2018, May-June). Student evaluations of teaching are not valid: It is time to stop using SET scores in personnel decisions. American Association of University Professors. https://www.aaup.org/article/student-evaluations-teaching-are-not-valid#.XoKYWihKjIU
  • Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond zoom: Asynchronous to maintain connection and engagement during COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391.
  • Marriot, P., & Teoh, L. K. 2012, November. Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Accounting Education 6: 583–598. doi:10.1080/09639284.2012.725637.
  • Mathisen, P. (2012). Video feedback in higher education - a contribution to improving the quality of written feedback. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(2), 97–116. doi:10.18261/1891-943X-2012-02-02
  • Mayhew, E. (2017). Playback feedback: The impact of screen-captured video feedback on student satisfaction, learning and attainment. European Political Science, 16, 179–192.https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.102
  • McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153–169.
  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Nicol, D. (2010, August). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 35(5), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559
  • Parton, B. S., Crain-Dorough, M., & Hancock, R. (2010, January). Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students? International Journal of Instructional Technology &, Distance Learning. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_10/article02.htm
  • Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online class. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 61(1. doi:10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870
  • Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154. doi:10.1080/02602930601127869
  • Protopsaltis, S., & Baum, S. 2019, January. Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy. The Laura and John Arnold Foundation. http://mason.gmu.edu/~sprotops/OnlineEd.pdf
  • Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88. doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
  • Russo, T., & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 54–62. Retrieved 15 November 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.8.1.54
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
  • Spears, L. R. (2012). Social presence, social interaction, collaborative learning, and satisfaction in online and face-to-facecourses [Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University]. Retrieved 1 September 2018. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/02dc/7c7e6db1e3c701a6b63287179c0d5c6038a4.pdf
  • Sull, E. C. (2008, November 28). Overcoming the #1 complaint of online students: Poor instructor feedback. Facultyfocus.com. Retrieved May 28, 2019 from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/overcoming-the-1-complaint-of-online-students-poor-instructor-feedback/.
  • Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
  • Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3). doi:10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
  • Tao, Y. (2009). The relationship between motivation and online social presence in an online class. [Dissertation presented to the University of Central Florida]. Retrieved 1 September 2018. http://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3871.
  • Thompson, R., & Lee, M. (2012, February 17). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 1. https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/talking-with-students-through-screencasting-experimentations-with-video-feedback-to-improve-student-learning/
  • Thompson, R., & Lee, M. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 1. https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/talking-with-students-through-screencasting-experimentations-with-video-feedback-to-improve-student-learning/
  • Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  • Wade, N. N. (2016). The face of feedback: Exploring the use of asynchronous video to deliver instructor feedback in multidisciplinary online courses. [Dissertation presented to Wayne State University]. Retrieved 23 August 2018. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2490&context=oa_dissertations
  • Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29. doi:10.1080/08923649409526852
  • Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 67–78. doi:10.1080/02602930801895752
  • West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400–410. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
  • Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & Del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271. doi:10.2190/v0lb-1m37-rnr8-y2u1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.