A Novel Approach to an Online Microbiology Experiment Yields Greater Student Success

References

• Abdel-Salam, T. M., Kauffmann, P. J., & Crossman, G. R. (2007). Are distance laboratories effective tools for technology education? American Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 77–97. doi:10.1080/08923640701299041
   Google Scholar
• Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science laboratory environment and academic performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(6), 500–506. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9072-4
   Google Scholar
• Anetta, L., Klesath, M., & Meyer, J. (2009). Taking science online: Evaluating presence and immersion through a laboratory experience in a virtual learning environment for entomology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(1), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–10. doi:10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Asbell-Clarke, J., & Rowe, E. (2007). Learning science online: A descriptive study of online science courses for teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3), 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1243–1289. doi:10.3102/0034654309333844
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, A. C. (2019). Adult science-based learning: The intersection of digital, science, and information literacies. Adult Learning, 30(3), 128–137. doi:10.1177/1045159519829042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, D. U., & Inan, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 41–65. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, F., Kwon, J., Ross, C., & Simpson, O. (2010). Student-student mentoring for retention and engagement in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(2), 115–130. doi:10.1080/02680511003787370
   Google Scholar
• Cano de Las Heras, S., Kensington-Miller, B., Young, B., Gonzalez, V., Kruhne, U., Mansouri, S. S., & Baroutian, S. (2021). Benefits and challenges of a virtual laboratory in chemical and biochemical engineering: Students’ experiences in fermentation. Journal of Chemistry Education, 98(3), 866–875. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 323–346. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9054-2
   Google Scholar
• Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE Journal, 16(2), 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. C. (2014). Teaching nontraditional adult students: Adult learning theories in practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 406–418. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H. J., & Kim, B. U. (2018). Factors affecting adult student dropout rates in the Korean Cyber-University degree programs. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/07377363.2017.1400357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., Bedgood, J., & R, D. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 853–865. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. doi:10.1126/science.1230579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, C. B., & Lampley, J. H. (2016). Community college student success in online versus equivalent face-to-face courses. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jobe, R., Lenio, J., & Saunders, J. (2018). The first year: Bridging content and experience for online adult learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 115–121. doi:10.1080/07377363.2018.1469074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. doi:10.1111/jcal.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennepohl, D. (2021). Laboratory activities to support online chemistry courses: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 99(11), 851–859. doi:10.1139/cjc-2020-0506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentnor, H. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1–2), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, D., Berry, C., Murray, S., & Lindsay, E. (2009). Adapting a remote laboratory architecture to support collaboration and supervision. International Journal of Online Engineering, 5(SI1: REV2009), 51–56. doi:10.3991/ijoe.v5i5.932
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, L. A., Wilson-Gentry, L. A., & Wooldridge, B. (2016). Rethinking connection: Master of public administration student perceptions of transactional presence. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(1), 35–48. doi:10.1080/15236803.2016.12002227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, J. H. (2016). Science-based laboratory comprehension: An examination of effective practices within traditional, online and blended learning environments. Open Learning, 31(3), 209–218. doi:10.1080/02680513.2016.1208080
   Google Scholar
• Rotar, O. (2017). Rethinking the support system for adult students in online learning environment. Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 7(4), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in tradition and virtual classroom higher education settings. International and Higher Education, 12, 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. (2018, November 8). What is considered low income in Wisconsin? PocketSense. https://pocketsense.com/considered-low-income-wisconsin-8281746.html
   Google Scholar
• Scutelnicu, G., Tekula, R., Gordon, B., & Knepper, H. J. (2019). Consistency is key in online learning: Evaluating student and instructor perceptions of a collaborative online-course template. Teaching Public Administration, 37(3), 274–292. doi:10.1177/0144739419852759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. E. & Seaman, J. (2019) Distance Education State Almanac. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/almanac/national_almanac2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, B. E., Hung, J.-L., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2017). Predicting student success by modeling student interaction in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 38(1), 59–69. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1299562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, V. (2018). Using the 3E framework in promoting adult learners’ success in online environments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 126–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C., Shute, V., Stewart, A., Beck-White, Q., Reinhards, C., Zhou, G., … D’Mello, S. (2022). The relationship between collaborative problem solving behaviors and solution outcomes in a game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S., & Huang, W. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151–164. doi:10.1080/07377363.2013.836823
   Google Scholar