Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access: Online Teaching Strategies and Institutional Support

References

• Abramenka-Lachheb, V., & de Siqueira, A. (2022). Authentic assessments through the lenses of diversity, equity, inclusion and justice in a fully online course. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v11i1.34591
   Google Scholar
• Aissaoui, N. (2022).The digital divide: A literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory & Communication, 71(8/9), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2020). Accessibility suffers during pandemic. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/06/remote-learning-shift-leavesstudents-disabilities-behind
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Anderson, J., Burke, R., De Fazio, T., Due, C., Hartley, L., & Sidhu, R. (2022). Equitable teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity: Exploring the possibilities for engaged pedagogy in post-COVID-19 higher education. Educational Review, 74(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2015293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2021). Accessibility in online courses: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. Tech Trends, 65(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00624-6
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R., & Grady, S. D. (2022). Course design considerations for inclusion and representation. A quality matters white paper. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/Course-Design-Considerations-for-Inclusion-and-Representation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, D. H.-C., Ng, A. K.-L., Kiang, K.-M., & Chan, H. H.-Y. (2020). Creating a community of inquiry in the science classroom: An effective pedagogy for teaching diverse students? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1491959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaway, W., & Bethune, S. (2015). Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction? Online Learning, 19(3), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.674
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, S., & Dikkers, A. G. (2021). Instructor social presence and connectedness in a quick shift from face-to-face to online instruction. Online Learning, 25(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: Implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: International mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2015.1072079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, A. E., Resnick, C. E., Bradford, K. D., & Othus‐Gault, S. M. (2022). Diversity by design: Broadening participation through inclusive teaching. New Directions for Community Colleges, 199(199), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20525
   Google Scholar
• Grant, K. S. L., & Lee, V. J. (2014). Teacher educators wrestling with issues of diversity in online courses. The Qualitative Report, 19(12), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1275
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., Ferrante, C. J., & Heppard, K. A. (2016). Using open-book exams to enhance student learning, performance, and motivation. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 19–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092705
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D., & Harris, T. (2021). Reimagining online grading, assessment, and testing using situated cognition. Distance Education, 42(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ikebuchi, S. (2023). Accessing education: Equity, diversity, and inclusion in online learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28349
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, M. V., Murray, A., & Novak, J. (2008). The faculty perspective on universal design for learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(2), 60–72. https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ahead.org%2fpublications%2fjped
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Kong, Y., & Tirotta-Esposito, R. (2023). Promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion: An examination of diversity-infused faculty professional development programs. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(11). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i11.6224
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Elements of award-winning courses. Online Learning, 23(4), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first-year undergraduate course. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.183704
   Google Scholar
• Kumi‐Yeboah, A., & Amponsah, S. (2022). An exploratory study of instructors’ perceptions on inclusion of culturally responsive pedagogy in online education. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumi-Yeboah, A. (2018). Designing a cross-cultural collaborative online learning framework for online instructors. Online Learning, 22(4), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., Yuan, G., & Smith, P. (2020). Cultural diversity in online education: An exploration of instructors’ perceptions and challenges. Teachers College Record, 122(7), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Bañuelos, M., Liu, Y., & Xu, D. (2022). Online instruction for a humanized learning experience: Techniques used by college instructors. Computers & Education, 189, 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2021). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makda, F., & Dlamini, R. (2022). Assessing the validity and reliability of quality design criterion rubric to evaluate online courses: A case of three entrepreneurial online short courses. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 18(2), 80–110. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewissue.php?id=65
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Oyarzun, B., & Sadaf, A. (2023). Higher education instructor perception of helpfulness of inclusive and equitable online teaching strategies. Online Learning, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. A., Howell, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Martin, F., Knight, S., & Frankovich, J. (2023). Faculty perspectives on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA) in online teaching. Online Learning, 27(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelongo, R., & Eaton, P. W. (2020). Online learning for social justice and inclusion: The role of technological tools in graduate student learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(1–2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro, E., & Jankowski, N. A. (2017). Equity and assessment: Moving towards culturally responsive assessment. Occasional Paper, 29(6), 10–11. https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/publications/occasional-papers
   Google Scholar
• Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2019). The NCES fast facts tool provides quick answers to many education questions. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics NCES. (2023). Undergraduate enrollment. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cha
   Google Scholar
• Ozfidan, B., Fayez, O., & Ismail, H. (2021). Student perspectives of online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 25(4), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacansky-Brock, M., Smedshammer, M., & Vincent-Layton, K. (2020). Humanizing online teaching to equitize higher education. Current Issues in Education, 21(2), n2. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1905
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A. M., Watson, E., Dyck, N., & Carey, J. P. (2021). Traditional versus open-book exams in remote course delivery: A narrative review of the literature. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14845
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. J., & Koppi, T. (2002). Inclusion and online learning opportunities: Designing for accessibility. ALT-J, 10(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v10i2.11398
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Martin, F., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2019). Student perceptions of the impact of quality matters-certified online courses on their learning and engagement. Online Learning, 23(4), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, T., Martin, F., Kim, S. Y., & Westine, C. (2023). Establishing a student evaluation of online teaching and learning framework through analysis of existing instruments. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, T. Q. (2019). Principles of inclusion, diversity, access, and equity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 220(Suppl_2), S30–S32. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tapanes, M. A., Smith, G. G., & White, J. A. (2009). Cultural diversity in online learning: A study of the perceived effects of dissonance in levels of individualism/collectivism and tolerance of ambiguity. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauke, B. (2019). The evolution of universal design. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 5(46), 36–41. https://biblioscout.net/article/99.140005/izr201905003601
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. A., & Dello Stritto, M. E. (2021). What is the future of online education? The perceptions of instructors with over a decade of online teaching experience. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 24(4). https://ojdla.com/articles/what-is-the-future-of-online-education-the-perceptions-of-instructors-with-over-a-decade-of-online-teaching-experience
   Google Scholar
• Trespalacios, J., Uribe-Flórez, L., Lowenthal, P. R., Lowe, S., & Jensen, S. (2023). Students’ perceptions of institutional services and online learning self-efficacy. American Journal of Distance Education, 37(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.1956836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S., Grover, K. S., Turner, R. C., & Alexander, J. C. (2017). Faculty perceptions related to teaching online: A starting point for designing faculty development initiatives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. Tech Trends, 61(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0207-z
   Google Scholar
• Wyss, V. L., Freedman, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2014). The development of a discussion rubric for online courses: Standardizing expectations of graduate students in online scholarly discussions. Tech Trends, 58(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0741-x
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar