References
- Araujo, D., Davids, K., & Hristovski, R. (2006). The ecological dynamics of decision-making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 653–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.07.002
- Buszard, T., Reid, M., Farrow, D., & Masters, R. (2013). Implicit motor learning: Designing practice for performance. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 60(21), 3–5. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/id/eprint/28808
- Davids, K. W., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.
- De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E., (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
- DrTimTennis. (n.d.). Home PTM at BSU: Graduate tennis progam [YouTube channel]. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWG2AA8tZmHBFWaQdHW5ibA
- Elderton, W. (2002). Moving to a game-based approach. ACE: Coach to Coach, 1–3. https://acecoach.com/coaching-article-library/
- Elderton, W. (2008). Situation training: key to training in a game-based approach. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 15(44), 24–25.
- Elderton, W. (2011). Progressive tennis–Innovation in junior development. Tennis Canada. https://www.tpacanada.com/sites/default/files/Inovation%20in%20Junior%20Development%20EN.pdf
- Farrow, D., & Reid, M. (2010). The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(7), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003770238
- Flick, L. (2020). Ten and under tennis for all ages! Editor: Ferman Konukman. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(4), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1724505
- Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.
- Hopper, T. (2011). Game-as-teacher: Modification by adaptation in learning through game-play. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2011.9730348
- International Tennis Federation (ITF). (2011). Competition formats. Play & Stay. Retrieved October 8, 2022. http://www.tennisplayandstay.com/competition/formats/hiddenformats.aspx
- International Tennis Federation (ITF). (2013). Tennis 10s: Official programme of the international tennis federation. Retrieved December 18, 2020, from http://www.tennisplayandstay.com/tennis10s/about-tennis10s/about-tennis10s.aspx
- Ivancevic, T. T., Jovanovic, B., Jovanovic, S., Djukic, M., Djukic, N., & Lukman, A. (2011). Paradigm shift for future tennis: The art of tennis physiology, biomechanics and psychology. Springer Science & Business Media. http://books.google.es/books?id=sAdTxftgK7AC
- Jarrett, K., & Harvey, S. (2016). Similar, but not the same: Comparing the game based approaches of teaching games for understanding (TGfU) and game sense. Ejournal de La Recherche Sur l’intervention En Éducation Physique et Sport -EJRIEPS, 38. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejrieps.900
- Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Olsen, J. L. (2020). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Human Kinetics.
- PTM. (2021). Professional tennis management: More than just a game. USTA. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.usta.com/en/home/coach/professional-tennis-management.html
- Reid, M., Crespo, M., Lay, B., & Berry, J. (2007). Skill acquisition in tennis: Research and current practice. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.011
- Renshaw, I., & Chow, J.-Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676
- Renshaw, I., Oldham, A. R., & Bawden, M. (2012). Nonlinear pedagogy underpins Intrinsic motivation in sports coaching. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x01205010088
- Rhoades, J. L., & Hopper, T. (2019). Reciprocal recursive nonconscious behavior mimicry, PE groupings, and modification-by-adaptation. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 11(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2019.1709088
- Rhoades, J. L., & Hopper, T. F. (2018). Utilizing student socio-coordinated mimicry: Complex movement conversations in physical education. Quest, 70(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2017.1373683
- Rink, J. E. (2014). Teaching Physical Education. In Teaching Physical Education (7th ed.). McGraw Hill https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042466
- Seifert, L., Araújo, D., Komar, J., & Davids, K. (2017). Understanding constraints on sport performance from the complexity sciences paradigm: An ecological dynamics framework. Human Movement Science, 56, 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.001
- Tennis Canada. (2015). Learn to play: A tennis curriculum for the fundamental stage of development. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from https://www.tpacanada.com/resources/tennis-in-your-community/learn-to-play
- Thorpe, R. D. (1986). A demonstration of a different focus. In D. Bunker, R. Thorpe, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 17–24) In Rethinking games teaching (pp. 17–24). University of Technology.
- Unierzyski, P., & Crespo, M. (2007). Review of modern teaching methods for tennis. (Análisis de los métodos actuales de enseñanza del tenis). RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Del Deporte, 3(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2007.00701
- United States Tennis Association. (2021). Net generation. Retrieved April 25, 2021, from https://netgeneration.usta.com/us-en/about.html
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. The MIT Press.